amir always posts the sine wave graph first. i cannot figure out what it is intended to convey. they all look the same to me except for the vertical rise, but that doesnt seem to be the same as the volts in the following graphs.
When you see the sine wave you see it in either peak voltage or peak-to-peak voltage.doesnt seem to be the same as the volts in the following graphs
amir always posts the sine wave graph first. i cannot figure out what it is intended to convey. they all look the same to me except for the vertical rise, but that doesnt seem to be the same as the volts in the following graphs.
amir always posts the sine wave graph first. i cannot figure out what it is intended to convey. they all look the same to me except for the vertical rise, but that doesnt seem to be the same as the volts in the following graphs.
One way to think about it is that a sine wave has a specific shape. If the input is a pure sine wave and the output takes on any other shape, the only way to change its shape is to add other sine waves of different frequencies and amplitudes. Those other waves were added by the device, which is distortion & noise. Put differently: every waveform of any shape can be created (or closely approximated) by adding together a bunch of sine waves having different frequencies & amplitudes.
The spectrum analysis is the Fourier transform of the output, which shows all the sine waves (frequencies & amplitudes) that if you add them all together it creates the output signal. If the input is a pure sine wave, for a perfect device (no noise or distortion) the Fourier transform will have a single spike at that frequency, and nothing else. Everything else is junk: distortion or noise.
Now the amount of junk in the output usually depends on the complexity of the input. The distortions can cascade additively: first you get harmonics or multiples of the input frequency, then you can get the differences between those frequencies as new frequencies (intermodulation), then each of those in turn gets harmonics, etc. The net effect is that the device does OK with a single sine wave, but it falls apart when given a more complex input. This is why Amir also does the multi-tone test.
For that, a frequency response curve is more appropriate. One can also use a square wave or impulse to get the same information.Is there anything other than width and amplitude that we can get from a sine wave ? Can there be some clue about decay or attack?
Than the sound of nature is never sine wave and its waves ( square, sawtooth,triangle ) contain harmonics but the sine waves coming output of digital audio devices do not contain harmonics ?For that, a frequency response curve is more appropriate. One can also use a square wave or impulse to get the same information.
Than the sound of nature is never sine wave and its waves ( square, sawtooth,triangle ) contain harmonics but the sine waves coming output of digital audio devices do not contain harmonics ?
Excuse me. I am also having trouble to tell what i want to learn
Do those different sound waves contain anything more than a sine wave? Like decay or attack you wrote in your previous message.