• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

What do you think about what I think about quantum physics?

And my fork doesn't stop there, because black holes can be explained similary. Something about them that stood out to me is the "fact" the event horizon "stores" the "data" of everything that passes it. In short, perhaps: 1) black holes are the "recycle bin", whereby the objects are deleted, but still actually there; OR 2) like when you actually delete a file on your computer, it's probably not "physically" deleted from the harddrive, but it's space just labelled as "free". Thus, the data is still technically there, but not taking up any space...
The Redmond interpretation of quantum mechanics: the quantum world operates on the same logic as MS Windoze.

I enjoyed the ramblings.
 
Sir, this is an audio forum.

This section is literally a part of the forum called "other areas of interest"

In other words - "anything goes"
 
You’re not paying attention. The issue I was discussing is that physicists don’t know how entanglement functions; how the inter-particle communication is executed. The Noble Prize was for characterization of the phenomenon.
OK, got it. You are looking for a theory beyond quantum mechanics. Fair enough.
 
I have yet to go on a quantum journey, however far my IQ can take me.

I do often find myself shallow and what actually got to me to consider anything quantum is that it will break traditional encryption that is the backbone of our society. If we can't make the cash flow, we better pick up our axes and do the best we can. Wish I was younger as could pick up a bigger axe.
 
I do often find myself shallow and what actually got to me to consider anything quantum is that it will break traditional encryption that is the backbone of our society.
I've been worried about quantum computing for this reason for 20 years. Over that period, I have occasionally talked to senior engineers at leading tech firms about this worry; they have invariably said that my concerns are misplaced.
 
I have yet to go on a quantum journey, however far my IQ can take me.

I do often find myself shallow and what actually got to me to consider anything quantum is that it will break traditional encryption that is the backbone of our society. If we can't make the cash flow, we better pick up our axes and do the best we can. Wish I was younger as could pick up a bigger axe.
NIST is working on "quantum resistant" encryption, and has made progress.


There's also quantum cryptography work being done, meaning that quantum mechanics are directly incorporated into encryption and decryption, but the technology is nascent.


So far, I like the NIST approach, because everything in quantum computing always seems to get a year farther away every calendar year. :)

I'm not worried, yet.
 
I've been worried about quantum computing for this reason for 20 years. Over that period, I have occasionally talked to senior engineers at leading tech firms about this worry; they have invariably said that my concerns are misplaced.
I don't think your concerns are misplaced at all. Huge amounts of investment are being made in quantum computing, and it's an in-vogue area of research around the world. A breakthrough is not out of the question.
 
Some of the Quantum computing firms have really gone far in terms of their products. Private investors (some of them with trillions) are lining up and will fire up that space. That is why I am worried, as don't think there is any control in that space.

People are just developing next level of mass destruction gear without any supervision. I am definitely not into regulation and government, but this particular thing is out of control and some government help would actually be needed.
 
NIST is working on "quantum resistant" encryption, and has made progress.


There's also quantum cryptography work being done, meaning that quantum mechanics are directly incorporated into encryption and decryption, but the technology is nascent.


So far, I like the NIST approach, because everything in quantum computing always seems to get a year farther away every calendar year. :)

I'm not worried, yet.
Problem is - hackers are hoovering up databases of information encrypted with current algorithms, and sitting on them until quantum computing can open them.

New algorithms are not going to help there.
 
I think we have finally outdone ourselves. Or about to soon.
 
Problem is - hackers are hoovering up databases of information encrypted with current algorithms, and sitting on them until quantum computing can open them.

New algorithms are not going to help there.
You have a point, but the hackers are probably going to be waiting a long time until they have cheap and unfettered access to working quantum computers. More likely the threat will come from government agencies long before hackers are a problem.
 
You have a point, but the hackers are probably going to be waiting a long time until they have cheap and unfettered access to working quantum computers. More likely the threat will come from government agencies long before hackers are a problem.
Many of the hackers are state agencies.
 
Problem is - hackers are hoovering up databases of information encrypted with current algorithms, and sitting on them until quantum computing can open them.

New algorithms are not going to help there.
And whoever encrypted that stuff knew (or should have known) that this was a possibility when choosing the type of encryption they were using - "How long will this stay secure?" has always been a factor for consideration, and that time is only ever going to reduce as new discoveries are made and computing resources increase. If the AI bubble bursts there's going to be a LOT of compute resource looking for work to do which could make a dent in those assumptions too.
 
Maybe this site could have a tab titled "Off Topic Discussions", and non-audio content could be posted there.
1759261466988.png

This is a Fun Topic.

As far as the OP goes -- I'd say: Trust the maths.
 
And whoever encrypted that stuff knew (or should have known) that this was a possibility when choosing the type of encryption they were using
there neither is now, nor was there then a better form that cannot be broken by quantum computers. We are still encrypting everything with algorithms that will be smashed when a sufficiently capable quantum computer becomes available.

We are developing alternatives, as linked above but they are not yet ready for commercial implementation.
 
Back
Top Bottom