Sublimity of Analog
Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2025
- Messages
- 38
- Likes
- 2
ThanksOnkyo C-7000R
View attachment 458730
Arcam CDS50
View attachment 458731
Marantz CD17mkII
View attachment 458732
Which is the best player here in term of sound quality?
ThanksOnkyo C-7000R
View attachment 458730
Arcam CDS50
View attachment 458731
Marantz CD17mkII
View attachment 458732
There are harmonics at 50, 600 and 800 Hz missing
I'm really looking forward to it.A number of you have been asking if a simple modern Blu-Ray Transport from Sony would make a decent CD Transport too. Well, you're about to know soon
View attachment 535328
It is the Sony BDP-S1700/K. Stay tuned!
BothP.S.: Is the drive really that small, or is the cat just that big?
Denon A1UD just sold very recently a few weeks back here is the UK and it was 100% complete fully working and more or less in mint condition very similar to mine for £1.4K ...So yeah these units are super popular and pretty rare to find now I was watching it and it sold within days of being up for sale .For a Denon DVD-A1UD in good condition, you can expect to get approximately €600–800; for units in mint ("1A") to like-new condition, you may get even more.
At auctions, or if the unit is in poor or defective condition, the price will be significantly lower.
Its been well established on these forums that CD players all sound the same. Purchase decisions should be based on price, build quality, looks, ergonomics , features etc. Not sound qualityThanks
Which is the best player here in term of sound quality?
Why would that be the case?I have always wondered if CD Changers have significantly degraded/measured performance compared to a single disc player, as a transport?
Maybe, you can test a Denon, Yamaha, or Sony ES changer and post the measurements, as a transport.
Agreed 100% However, there is a persistent myth that only single disc CD players are SOTA and this is reflected by seeing that nearly all performance reviews are of single disc CD players. This is why science tests theories and challenges myths.Why would that be the case?
The actual drive mechanism—meaning the spindle that holds the CD and the laser—isn't different; they are the same components found in conventional players.
The actual changer mechanism plays no part in the CD playback process itself.
At the digital output, any differences would be as negligible as they have been in all previous tests.
There certainly have been—and still are—CD changers with basic, cheap DAC implementations that might measure and sound worse as a result, but the exact same applies to standard CD players.