• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

What budget speakers you like to see reviewed?

geoemm

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
38
Likes
48
Location
Germany
Your tests so far have been extremely informative. In retrospect I'm glad I went for some Paradigms rather than Klipschs last year for a similar budget. That's assuming Paradigms are as good as their methodology promises, but I'm perfectly happy with them so far. So far JBL and Revel have held their promise. The logical upgrade for me would be in the $700-1000 range and you've already done two conclusive Revel and Elac tests in that range. Most of all you've established that $1000 can indeed get you state-of-the-art speakers, contrary to widespread audiophile legends. I'd be interested in tests of European brands such as Triangle, Focal, System Audio, Dali, Dynaudio, Piega, Phonar... simply out of curiosity, and those may not be widely available in the US. As far as I'm concerned if I decided to "upgrade" I'd simply go with some Revels, or anything equivalent you've tested at that time, and call it a day.
Which Paradigms did you go for and from where did you buy it (since you are also from EU)
 

detlev24

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Messages
305
Likes
293
Canton GLE 416.2
Multiple of these might work well in a home theatre with an acoustic screen. Canton claims that they can play down to 45Hz, but I really doubt that.
I am considering the Canton AM 5 for home theatre use, instead. They are powered, accept balanced input and do have an automatic on/off feature. [Which is missing on the JBL 70xP series; but that's a different topic.]

In Europe, the price varies between 200-230 EUR/piece [220-250 USD/piece] vs. the MSRP of 369 EUR/piece - but that's all including ~20% VAT (depending on the country of purchase).

Of course, at this small size, they do have a limited low frequencies output but that's not an issue in a home theatre, where usually one or multiple subwoofers are in place.

Furthermore, Canton claims in the manual "Maximum sound quality requires a breaking-in time of 15-20 operating hours". :rolleyes: Probably just wrong advertisement for a loudspeaker, that is considered to be a professional studio monitor.
 

infinitesymphony

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Messages
1,072
Likes
1,809
I'd be interested in tests of European brands such as Triangle, Focal, System Audio, Dali, Dynaudio, Piega, Phonar... simply out of curiosity, and those may not be widely available in the US. As far as I'm concerned if I decided to "upgrade" I'd simply go with some Revels, or anything equivalent you've tested at that time, and call it a day.
Out of those, Focal and Dynaudio have the widest availability in the US. I suspect we are going to see an obvious house curve with a BBC-like dip in the sensitivity range from Dynaudio based on the speakers I've heard. Great for music listening--non-fatiguing and pleasant--but almost impossible to get a mix to translate.
 

JR4321

Member
Joined
May 21, 2017
Messages
54
Likes
24
Some type of panel or electrostatic speaker. Magnepan, Sanders, MartinLogan, etc. I've read that Magnepan won't even submit their's for test as they don't get good results. Yet lots of people like them (myself included). It would be interesting to see the data and resulting discussion.
 

Ron Texas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 10, 2018
Messages
6,190
Likes
9,276
As a general rule the speaker should be in production and easily available. If it is generating a lot of buzz elsewhere that's a plus. My definition of budget is $1000/pair for stand mounts and $1300 for floor standing.
 
Last edited:

detlev24

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Messages
305
Likes
293
[...] I suspect we are going to see an obvious house curve with a BBC-like dip in the sensitivity range from Dynaudio based on the speakers I've heard. [...]
I doubt this would be applicable to the Core series which, btw., are still undergoing further firmware optimizations. At Dynaudio, they definitely have the know-how and the facilities to build world-class professional gear. For instance, have a look at their 'Jupiter' measurement room. This reminds me a bit of the research facilities at Harman International.^^

If Dynaudio screwed up those loudspeakers, then it must have been on purpose! :p

Sorry for the slight off-topic; the Core series can certainly not be considered "budget" by the definition of @amirm. [But I'm absolutely looking forward to some independent measurements...]
 
Last edited:

sejarzo

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2018
Messages
974
Likes
1,075
https://www.whathifi.com/us/reviews/triangle-borea-br03

"The Boreas also demonstrate an excellent sense of timing. There’s plenty of precision and no trace of lag as Nina Simone’s My Baby Just Cares For Me trots along. The snare drum and piano sound like they’re having plenty of fun in each other’s company."

I just HATE HATE HATE HATE HATE IT when my woofer is walking and my tweeter is cantering, don't you?
 

ta240

Major Contributor
Joined
Nov 7, 2019
Messages
1,417
Likes
2,840
BR03 seems like a favo of almost all reliable sources

temp.jpg


edit: corrected the quote. I was lazy and had went with an existing picture but didn't want one that said "You keep using that word" because that didn't fit.
 
Last edited:

Terry Stahly

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Messages
72
Likes
20
The best home theater center channel regardless of cost. The one that creates the most dramatic full depth sound like you are in the theater.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,590
Likes
239,511
Location
Seattle Area

Terry Stahly

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2020
Messages
72
Likes
20
Thread title:
What budget speakers you like to see reviewed?

see picture in above thread.
It clearyy says the best regardless of cost. Obviously there are two or three perhaps more that people feel are at the top of the heap it would be great to find out what that is, I have a very high end system and before I spend $6,000 plus tax on a Bowers HTM1 D3 I want to make sure there is not a better one or one that is less money that is either better or equal. Pretty simple question but perhaps a little more detail here will help explain it.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,590
Likes
239,511
Location
Seattle Area
BR03 seems like a favo of almost all reliable sources
Well, it seems they have sent a bunch of free loaners to online youtubers so I would not call any of those sources reliable.

With tax it costs $600 shipped to me from Amazon so not cheap. Looking at the design, I doubt that it will perform well.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,590
Likes
239,511
Location
Seattle Area
It clearyy says the best regardless of cost. Obviously there are two or three perhaps more that people feel are at the top of the heap it would be great to find out what that is, I have a very high end system and before I spend $6,000 plus tax on a Bowers HTM1 D3 I want to make sure there is not a better one or one that is less money that is either better or equal. Pretty simple question but perhaps a little more detail here will help explain it.
This thread was for cheap speakers that I would buy to test. So anything expensive is definitely outside of the scope of this thread/request.
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,867
Likes
16,819
I doubt this would be applicable to the Core series which, btw., are still undergoing further firmware optimizations. At Dynaudio, they definitely have the know-how and the facilities to build world-class professional gear. For instance, have a look at their 'Jupiter' measurement room. This reminds me a bit of the research facilities at Harman International.^^

If Dynaudio screwed up those loudspeakers, then it must have been on purpose! :p

Sorry for the slight off-topic; the Core series can certainly not be considered "budget" by the definition of @amirm. [But I'm absolutely looking forward to some independent measurements...]
You can see the sound power problems from the Dynaudio monitors already optically (missing waveguides) and it is confirmed at the measurements, for example from Bob Katz, here his listening position measurements without and with correction with his ex Genelec 8260 monitors

1585349386124.png

(source of measurements: https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/katzs-corner-episode-one)

and his later top of the line huge Dynaudio Evidence M5P monitors which he unfortunately even EQed to the same target curve which made more sense on his ex Genelec

1585349463452.png

(source of measurements: https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/katzs-corner-episode-17-perfecting-perfection)
 

detlev24

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Messages
305
Likes
293
You can see the sound power problems from the Dynaudio monitors already optically (missing waveguides) and it is confirmed at the measurements, for example from Bob Katz, here his listening position measurements without and with correction with his ex Genelec 8260 monitors [...]
[OFF-TOPIC:]

Thank you for the information. I'm not sure the M5P Evidence can be compared to the Core series, as it is a totally different design approach and it also does not have the new drivers, e.g., the 'Esotar Pro' tweeter - which to date is Dynaudio's best and an evolution of the M5P's 'Esotar 2'.

This of course rises the question whether every loudspeaker would benefit from a wave-guide. :) As far as I know, it's a quite complex procedure to design a matching wave-guide and it probably could even make things worse.

Katz's previous Genelecs certainly are a pair of well designed loudspeakers but from what I understand, what can be seen on their (semi-)anechoic measurements has already undergone quite some factory calibration.

...Couldn't (some of the) imperfections be fixed on every loudspeaker via internal DSP, mainly limited by/limiting distortion-free max. target SPL? [Probably the 'Dutch & Dutch 8c' is one of the most advanced loudspeakers in these regards.]

PS: There are definitely too many target curves around; although there's no "truth" yet.^^ The one that Bob Katz uses is different to, e.g., what we see from research at Harman International.
 

thewas

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
6,867
Likes
16,819
Couldn't (some of the) imperfections be fixed on every loudspeaker via internal DSP
Directivity problems cannot fixed by EQ/DSP, only partially in the case you can change the crossover frequencies.

I'm not sure the M5P Evidence can be compared to the Core series, as it is a totally different design approach and it also does not have the new drivers, e.g., the 'Esotar Pro' tweeter - which to date is Dynaudio's best and an evolution of the M5P's 'Esotar 2'.
The problem also of the Core series is not their tweeter, but the missing waveguide.

This of course rises the question whether every loudspeaker would benefit from a wave-guide. :) As far as I know, it's a quite complex procedure to design a matching wave-guide and it probably could even make things worse.
Of course it is not easy, but for in these times and a huge company like Dynaudio it shouldn't be a problem, just needs the correct targets and people. But it seems they are now getting aware of it and make a kind of waveguide in their new top of the line passive ones https://www.dynaudio.de/home-audio/confidence

Katz's previous Genelecs certainly are a pair of well designed loudspeakers but from what I understand, what can be seen on their (semi-)anechoic measurements has already undergone quite some factory calibration.
I am not sure what you mean with it, of course any active loudspeaker is calibrated to some target curve.

PS: There are definitely too many target curves around; although there's no "truth" yet.^^ The one that Bob Katz uses is different to, e.g., what we see from research at Harman International.
I didn't criticise the different target curves but that Katz obviously used one for his Dynaudio that used to match the directivity of his ex Genelec but not of his Dynaudio.
 
Top Bottom