• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

What budget speakers you like to see reviewed?

No, I'm ready to move along....unlike many here.
I have some "vintage" stuff, that unless you are going with a KEF LS60 setup (with a pair of subs) or better: you may have trouble beating it.
Of course, in my applications, aesthetics are a consideration & the LS60 setup (with a pair of subs) would work & perhaps be better than what I have.
Although MOST of their features are not useful to me.
I did surround for many years, I have been doing less immersive for sometime now.
Maybe (if I get a larger home again [likely but not for a few more years]) I may go more immersive again.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and I mean...as a practical matter. Irregardless of vintage quality, it makes the most sense to accrue a test library of current items. Mostly since the lifespan of the articles themselves will outlast the products, for the most part.

Although, I don't mean that as some kind of Holiday Buyer's Guide either. Maybe the exception for a few very well-known and common vintage speakers. Like a high end, a mid and low....excuse the pun. I'm sure making the list would be fun in itself. So instead of freakish speaker obscuriia, the more common vintage ones get tested and are good for reference, or maybe laughs. I don't know most all of the vintage speakers you people do. My vintage stuff is all KEF, lol. I have a few early C15 and iQ and Q5 Q65 Q75 from new 35 years ago, with Q350s as my own "reference". I can tell you everything about those! They didnt' test super well either.

I just finished with Amir's LS50 Meta review, they are tempting me away from my 8 year old Q350 with a repaired cone. Also considering Q550, Q Concerto thing and Q3 Meta, which seems like a revamped Q350 6 1/2 driver

Ill be doing a post on the choices, I'm not loving the idea of spending loot, but the LS50 Meta is not bad marked down to $850 ish now. I listen loud and use subs in a small room, in the extant case. I already have tower speakers out the butt. I might just do it because the rest of my system is pretty uptight. Is that a good reason?
 
Yes, and I mean...as a practical matter. Irregardless of vintage quality, it makes the most sense to accrue a test library of current items. Mostly since the lifespan of the articles themselves will outlast the products, for the most part.

Although, I don't mean that as some kind of Holiday Buyer's Guide either. Maybe the exception for a few very well-known and common vintage speakers. Like a high end, a mid and low....excuse the pun. I'm sure making the list would be fun in itself. So instead of freakish speaker obscuriia, the more common vintage ones get tested and are good for reference, or maybe laughs. I don't know most all of the vintage speakers you people do. My vintage stuff is all KEF, lol. I have a few early C15 and iQ and Q5 Q65 Q75 from new 35 years ago, with Q350s as my own "reference". I can tell you everything about those! They didnt' test super well either.

I just finished with Amir's LS50 Meta review, they are tempting me away from my 8 year old Q350 with a repaired cone. Also considering Q550, Q Concerto thing and Q3 Meta, which seems like a revamped Q350 6 1/2 driver

Ill be doing a post on the choices, I'm not loving the idea of spending loot, but the LS50 Meta is not bad marked down to $850 ish now. I listen loud and use subs in a small room, in the extant case. I already have tower speakers out the butt. I might just do it because the rest of my system is pretty uptight. Is that a good reason?
Desire for something different (and hopefully better) is a good enough reason for change (at least as far as I am concerned).
Bang for buck is also interesting: when you can get a deal on the better...
 
Yes, and I mean...as a practical matter. Irregardless of vintage quality, it makes the most sense to accrue a test library of current items. Mostly since the lifespan of the articles themselves will outlast the products, for the most part.

Although, I don't mean that as some kind of Holiday Buyer's Guide either. Maybe the exception for a few very well-known and common vintage speakers. Like a high end, a mid and low....excuse the pun. I'm sure making the list would be fun in itself. So instead of freakish speaker obscuriia, the more common vintage ones get tested and are good for reference, or maybe laughs. I don't know most all of the vintage speakers you people do. My vintage stuff is all KEF, lol. I have a few early C15 and iQ and Q5 Q65 Q75 from new 35 years ago, with Q350s as my own "reference". I can tell you everything about those! They didnt' test super well either.

I just finished with Amir's LS50 Meta review, they are tempting me away from my 8 year old Q350 with a repaired cone. Also considering Q550, Q Concerto thing and Q3 Meta, which seems like a revamped Q350 6 1/2 driver

Ill be doing a post on the choices, I'm not loving the idea of spending loot, but the LS50 Meta is not bad marked down to $850 ish now. I listen loud and use subs in a small room, in the extant case. I already have tower speakers out the butt. I might just do it because the rest of my system is pretty uptight. Is that a good reason?
Current items show up on the used market frequently as there are always those early adopters that seem to ALWAYS be hunting the newest thing.
I 100% agree that we should be front loading as much newer stuff as possible.
But, I think that a look back can be surprising as to how good some of it was/is.
 
Another approach could be directly compare the older and newer versions of big name speakers in a given class. The Old _______ verses the New ________ in 6" bookshelf or whatever.

Surely people could identify models whose counterparts have already been tested. Then make the comparison when the other speaker gets tested. I'm sure you guys could have a field day with it.
 
Another approach could be directly compare the older and newer versions of big name speakers in a given class. The Old _______ verses the New ________ in 6" bookshelf or whatever.

Surely people could identify models whose counterparts have already been tested. Then make the comparison when the other speaker gets tested. I'm sure you guys could have a field day with it.
Also: not all great speakers have a modern day counterpart (out of business or whatever).
Companies don't always go out of business because their product was bad.
 
I'm trying to think of a vintage speaker that is pretty conventional, and may have a modern counterpart.

Polk / JBL / B&W / Klipsch (!) / Martin Logan / Paradigm are all current as well as widely sold vintage.
 

A few more:​

Wharfedale (1932)​

Wharfedale has launched enough pairs of anniversary speakers in recent years (the latest of which is the 85th-anniversary Denton 85) to remind us that the British brand is fast approaching its centurion.

Indeed, it's been 88 years since Wharfedale’s first speaker was built in the cellar of the llkley home of founder Gilbert Briggs, who designed Wharfedale speakers over two decades and wrote over 20 books on high-fidelity audio. The Bronze speaker started life purely as a drive unit (enthusiasts assembled their own cabinets) before being housed in a wooden cabinet a year later as an option for those who wanted an ‘extension’ speaker.

Its invention of the first two-way loudspeaker in the '40s, and the use of ceramic magnets in its speakers, have been among Wharfedale's most notable achievements, but the brand went on to be defined by the monumental success of its Diamond speaker range, launched in the '80s and still enjoying success to this day.

Tannoy (1926)​

To borrow an excerpt from our Tannoy: after 90 years, what does the future hold? piece, "Tannoy wasn’t always Tannoy. It was the Tulsemere Manufacturing Company in 1926, when broadcasting was in its infancy and the first talking film had yet to be shown. Radio sets needed huge batteries, which in turn needed huge chargers. Enter one Guy R Fountain, who came up with a new type of electrical rectifier, with the aim of making home-friendly chargers.

"This did rather well, and Fountain founded a company named after the two metals used in the rectifier: Tantalum and lead alloy. The Tannoy trademark first appeared in 1928 and quickly became associated with inescapable public address systems. They even made it into the British House of Commons."

Having provided PAs to the British Ministry of Defence and RAF airfields during WWII, and inventing the Dual Concentric speaker in the years following, Tannoy finally entered the place most of it subsequent efforts would reside: the home. And it has had a fair bit of success...

Bang & Olufsen

Celestion (1924)​

Celestion is a big name in the guitar world thanks to its decades spent manufacturing guitar speakers, but the hi-fi industry owes a great deal to the British brand. Soon after it was founded in 1924 by Cyril French (who was later joined by two of his brothers), Celestion manufactured one of the world's earliest cone loudspeakers, based on the design of Eric Mackintosh.

The company became one of the pioneering speaker driver manufacturers in the decades following. It made drivers for the legendary B&W P1 and Spendor BC1 speakers in the '60s, for example, and, amid multiple acquisitions and name changes (Celestion's history has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride!), the brand continued to make award-winning designs, such as the ribbon tweeter.

In 1992, Celestion was sold to Kinergetics Holdings UK Ltd, the company under which it, and KEF, still operate.
 
I bought the LS50 Metas for $860 open box Best Buy :facepalm:

I have a small room, so it might be a great choice for cheap reference.

Not often do you hear so much agreement on an audio component, especially a speaker, this goes back to the orig LS50. I have my Hypex NC 252 for it....should be nice and clean.

Good chat. I'll check back later...


 
Already asked in different thread, but here are some budget speakers (proclaimed studio monitors) I would love you to review. All 5 inch, in range from 120$-220$ for a pair. They have relatively positive user reviews, but there is a lack of detailed professional reviews out there.

Samson MediaOne M50/M50BT (M50BT has bluetooth and carbon woofer instead of a plastic one which the default model has)
ESI Aktiv 05 (successor of older ESI nEar05)
Behringer K5 (collaboration with the founder of KRK speakers, who apparently said this is his best work yet)
 
Monitor Audio Bronze 100 and Cerwin Vega LA165 please!
 
Last edited:
I'd personally like to hear what amirm thinks of the ~650hz dip. I think it should be fixable, but its always good to hear what others think.
Very much agree. Would love to see an ASR review and (more) discussion on these myself too. Apart from that dip they seem to get a lot of things right, and the OOB configurability of their DSP makes them quite unique in the market.
 
Back
Top Bottom