I’m really happy that some manufacturers have the guts to remove the silly biwire terminals .
Not even KEF my favourite brand does that …
Not even KEF my favourite brand does that …
I wish Kef would bring out a modern version of the Corelli speakerStill one of his favourite retro designs despite having reviewed later quite some more expensive ones:
I won't buy a speaker with those, on the general principle that I won't pay for audio woo.I’m really happy that some manufacturers have the guts to remove the silly biwire terminals .
I won't buy a speaker with those, on the general principle that I won't pay for audio woo.
KEF and Revel should certainly know better.
My issue with these comparisons is the wildly different price ranges here in Europe.Still one of his favourite retro designs despite having reviewed later quite some more expensive ones:
Model | Price |
JBL L52 | €999 |
Wharfedale Linton 85 | €1250 including stands |
MoFi SourcePoint 8 | €3000 |
MoFi SourcePoint 10 | €5000 |
Klipsch Heresy IV | €4500 |
Klipsch Forte IV | €6400 |
KLH Model 5 | €3300 |
True, but there are plenty of great speakers without the double binding posts, especially from small companies like Ascend and Philharmonic, that don't cater to the wooster market.I have to let that slide a bit , if you always was so steadfast in your principles you get nothing done
I believe the point is that they compare favorably to these more expensive speakers, no?My issue with these comparisons is the wildly different price ranges here in Europe.
Model Price JBL L52 €999 Wharfedale Linton 85 €1250 including stands MoFi SourcePoint 8 €3000 MoFi SourcePoint 10 €5000 Klipsch Heresy IV €4500 Klipsch Forte IV €6400 KLH Model 5 €3300
Why would I even compare a €5000 speaker to a €1250 model? It was especially noticable with American reviewers comparing the Wharfedale tot the KLH. That one is almost 3 times the price.
Well, an often seen comparison is versus the KLH Model 5, which retail for $2500 for a pair including stands. Whereas the the Linton's retail for $1800-2000 per pair including stands.I believe the point is that they compare favorably to these more expensive speakers, no?
I’m thinking of getting a ls50 as a center channel with Lintons as L/R. Anyone tried it and if so, what’s their finding?
@napilopez thanks for your input. do you know any center to be a better match ?I'm sure the LS50 would be fine and would almost certainly be better than any MTM, but I wonder if youd be better off with something that closer directivity behavior (not just width, though that helps). I assume you were planning on using the LS50 (meta?) on their side?
The Linton have a wide 3-way cone and dome directivity whereby they maintain constant-ish diectivity between 2khz-6khz, then start to narrow. The KEF has the usual deep waveguide off axis response with steeper slopes at further angles.
Sharing my own measurements for the Meta just because Erin doesn't have the off-axis FR on his site.
Using spinorama.org similarity tool, the closest tonality to the Lintons are the Selah Audio Integrity, KEF R3 and March Audio Sointuva. Now where do I find a single KEF R3 for sale
Unfortunately can’t fit an upright speaker. Or would have to be on the floor and a beer small speaker at that.Presumably your reciever has EQ though right? It would would probably take a just a couple of filters to get the KEFs to better match the Linton in tonality, although you'd have to take a little care due to the different directivities.
No surprise with the Polk sounding muffled. As you know that configuration isn't going to have great directivity.
Just to confirm, you don't have room to fit an upright bookshelf, right? The Revel M105 is doing a wonderful job for me at the moment, although an old Revel C12 3-way I got for cheap on eBay is set to arrive this week.
Unfortunately, your options are indeed limited at around the price of $300. I did get my Revel C12 for less than that, and I'm willing to bet that would be a better directivity match for your Lintons, but there are only a handful of measurements out there.
The monoprice thx-365C looks like a closer directivity match to the Lintons above 2khz, which I think would make it easier to match tonality as well. It seems like the only thing you'd really have to EQ is the extra energy on the monoprice around 1kHz(or perhaps raise the missing energy on the Wharfdale).
Anyway, just a thought. I'm sure the LS50s would be a big improvement over the Polks
@napilopez thanks for your input. do you know any center to be a better match ?
Alas, i have no space for such a behemoth. I stick to stereo for movies as well.I used a Polk S30 for a week and then bought a Wharfedale EVO 4C as a center, it was a huuuuuge improvement.
The 4C is pretty big but being a 3 way speaker it sound great and it has the same walnut finish as my Lintons