• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

We measure audio equipment for free!!!

I guess it is in reference to this post:
 
@SonofJura’s request has been honored.

Let’s stay on topic here.

Thanks!
 
No subwoofers are being tested right?
I have a Genelec 7360a 10" sub I could send in.
 
No subwoofers are being tested right?
I have a Genelec 7360a 10" sub I could send in.
I am not set up to test subs. It requires outdoor testing and they are quite heavy to boot.
 
Hey everyone, very long time EE lurker who has purchased over the years Topping DX7 Pro, L70, MiniDSP Flex, Genelec 8030c, Qudelix 5k, and more just because of ASR. Since a car audio subforum was recently opened, I figured I'd poke my head out and ask @amirm if you would be able to review the Kicker Key200.4 and Key500.1 car amps with autoDSP? I already run both in my car but am curious what you can find with your battery of tests given these are updated units from the 2021 review.

Would be happy to order them to your address, please let me know!
 
1.) Would like to see measures on my Musical Fidelity DAVID II Class A amp i good shape. I bought a lot of newer components (Capacitors, Diodes and selden original BB Opamps to improve it later on and see the difference - especially in the power suply and the pre amp stage.

2.) Have an modern derivat of an DUAL MM Phono Stage with external PSU and would like to see how it performs.

Can provide High-End Coffee and some expertise in music production :)

Any nerd in Berlin/Germany?

Best!
Michael
 
I'm keen to see the new Fiio K15 Roon endpoint/DAC/Headphone Amp reviewed. Looks like a category killer if it all works as advertised.
 
Different link now it seems, as that is broken;
I don't believe Fiio have a rep account here... but would be good if they sent one to Amir for testing, as it looks decent actually.


JSmith
 
I have been impressed from S.M.S.L. M20 and I would like to know your comment and see a review for it.
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Francesco
 
I have a pair of cheap Chinese headphones which my ex left with me. I think it's probably the worst sounding headphones in the world that ever existed. Have always wanted it to be measured (just for fun of course) just to see how horrid a headphone can get lol
 
Last edited:
My Journey with Magnepan Room Correction and system optimization

System Optimization

Since the 1970s, when I first heard the Magnepan Tympani, I've been a fan of dipole speakers. I had many KEF and Focal speakers, and later I returned to dipole speakers: the Martin Logan Stylus, the Magnepan 1.7, and finally the Magnepan 3.7i. The best power amplifier for the Magnepan and all speakers is the Purifi power amplifier period. I wouldn't trade it for a $95,000 Pass Lab. Additionally I added a Rythmik F12 XLR3 subwoofer to satisfy my bass needs.
I started my journey of room correction with a Magnepan with a NAD C658 preamp and a full-featured Dirac room adjustment system. What happened:

Magnepan Room Correction Problems with Dirac
Using Dirac Live with Magnepan 3.7i speakers presented challenges. The time-alignment across the full frequency range made the Maggies sound boxy and unnatural. Dirac’s global phase correction interfered with the dipole radiation and the natural 'air' of the speakers. Even if I restricted the frequency range to 20 -200Hz, Dirac would time align my room reflections to 20khz. The result was technically correct but musically unsatisfying.
By the way the NAD C658 is a very good versatile piece of equipment, which is made for the Purifi power amp.

Advantages of Using the dbx VENU360 Instead of Dirac
Switching to the dbx VENU360 offered advantages over Dirac when paired with Magnepans. The dbx focuses on amplitude-based AutoEQ without imposing full-band time alignment. This preserves the natural openness and imaging of the Maggies while smoothing room-induced peaks and dips. Additionally, the dbx allows precise crossover and subwoofer integration (time alignment) without over-processing.

Going Analog into the dbx
Initially, the system was fed into the dbx via analog inputs (NAD’s XLR’s). This worked well, but it meant going through an extra A/D conversion before processing, which limited the potential clarity and added unnecessary conversion stages.

Switching to AES Digital Input with Wiim Pro Plus
The introduction of the Wiim Pro Plus streamer changed the chain significantly. Using the AES/EBU input on the dbx connecting the WiiM pro plus digital coax out over a 75-to-110 Ohm impedance converter, which allowed a direct digital handoff. This eliminated the redundant A/D step, ensuring cleaner signal delivery into the dbx.

Wiim Pro Plus – Best Software in Class (personal opinion)
Beyond the hardware, the Wiim Pro Plus stands out for its software ecosystem. The app is intuitive,
stable, and offers excess to all streaming apps. Compared to many competitors,

Restricting Output to 24/48 to Match the dbx
Although capable of 24/192 output, I restricted the Wiim to 24/48. This matches the dbx VENU360’s internal DSP rate, preventing unnecessary down sampling inside the processor. In this setup, the Wiim delivers a bit-perfect 24/48 stream directly clocked to the dbx, achieving maximum transparency.

Clocking and Jitter Considerations
With Sample Rate Conversion disabled on the dbx, the processor locks directly to the Wiim’s low-jitter clock. This ensures stable, accurate timing. Feeding 24/192 into the dbx would have forced a resample down to 48 kHz internally and use the lower quality DBX clock. By restricting the Wiim to 24/48, the system avoids this redundancy.

High Headroom for Volume Control
The Wiim Pro Plus upsamples internally to 32-bit precision for volume control. Feeding the dbx a 24-bit, 48 kHz stream ensures over 140 dB of dynamic range, so the Wiim volume control provides plenty of headroom without audible resolution loss. This makes digital volume control transparent and safe, even at moderate listening levels.

Final Take
I calibrated the system with the dbx venue 360 connected to the dbx RTA microphone. I used the DBX AutoEQ. The calculated DBX room correction can then be fine-tuned manually. I used the microphone positions for the right and left ear. This results in a very close seating position, but with the best results for me. Finally, a few thoughts on high-resolution DACs or improving with better streamer transport, etc. With room noise of ~30dB and the influence of the room and speakers, investing in expensive equipment is not worth it. I checked out expensive DACs, but in the end, I sold them; I didn't hear any noticeable difference.
With the WiiM pro plus -> DBX Venue 360 -> Purifi -> 3.7i + Rythmik system, I'm happy with my Maggies. Finally.
 
My Journey with Magnepan Room Correction and system optimization

System Optimization

Since the 1970s, when I first heard the Magnepan Tympani, I've been a fan of dipole speakers. I had many KEF and Focal speakers, and later I returned to dipole speakers: the Martin Logan Stylus, the Magnepan 1.7, and finally the Magnepan 3.7i. The best power amplifier for the Magnepan and all speakers is the Purifi power amplifier period. I wouldn't trade it for a $95,000 Pass Lab. Additionally I added a Rythmik F12 XLR3 subwoofer to satisfy my bass needs.

LOL, period.
 
i have a QSC GX5 rated at 500w RMS 8ohm and im just curious how accurate this is cause they seem to list their specs at 1k sine apposed to the full spectrum (musical power)
500w both channels driven or 650w when driving only one channel

i also have a Pioneer SA-6700 (North America model (has meters)) from 1975 that's rated at 40wpc RMS 8ohm but know this is from back when stuff was underrated and overbuilt. im curious how much it has to offer

also curious on the AudioBox GO outputs
 
Last edited:
As a general rule, testing needs to have value for the membership. Otherwise, it will just be private testing. So equipment that is not in production doesn't fit the charter of what I test. You are always welcome to commission a private test for which I charge less than industry rates but it is not free or very cheap.
 
As a general rule, testing needs to have value for the membership. Otherwise, it will just be private testing. So equipment that is not in production doesn't fit the charter of what I test. You are always welcome to commission a private test for which I charge less than industry rates but it is not free or very cheap.
Dear Sir
How much does it cost for a non-member to have your mat tested?
How much does it cost to become a member? What is the membership fee?
Finally, if I were to test the mat, how would you do it? Are there any comparison conditions or references?
Please let me know when you have time. Thank you.

Best Regard
By Simon
email:[email protected]
 
Recordings like the ones shown in the top waveform plots will give you plenty of intersample overs. And they are the direct results of clipping the signals. How much do you think having a 3 dB margin for intersample overs will help to recover the original unclipped signals? Almost zilch is the answer. So why should I care about DAC intersample overs headroom, when there is an infinitely bigger problem intentionally created by the music producers that I cannot solve?
Gee, I didn't think that engineers still had to be told not to exceed 0db on the record level meter. I learned that back around 1960 when I got my first tape recorder from Allied Radio.
s-l1200.jpg


I even built one of these so I could broadcast my recordings around the house, so KOOL.
wpe50.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom