• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Watches! What do y'all have on your wrists?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 5620
  • Start date Start date
1000003347.jpg

The colour in the picture doesn't do it justice. It is a very attractive watch, or so I think. Nice skeleton back and just an understated, tasteful design.
 
Oh there's lots of Casio watches I could still get. But it's gotta stop somewhere. I barely need even one watch lol. When I got the box those are in I had 15 watches so there was room in the box for three more. I decided I'd fill those last spots and that would be it. It's a nice stopping point.
Or... it's a nice point to get a second box.
 
Or... it's a nice point to get a second box.

lol...I'm going to do my best to resist that temptation. I've been feeling a strong need to move in the other direction lately...I want to reduce my "stuff" rather than add to it. I have too much clutter around me and really want to shift into more of a "minimalist" approach.
 
Hate things on my wrists. I feel I'm about to be read my rights.
My wife bought me a Tag watch, and so I have to say it's nice, but really it's just another of those faked-up luxury brands - nice case, but COTS mechanisms. You'd be surprised how many brands just buy in third party movements - watches are a con. Except maybe Casio.
 
Well, with the acquisition of this sweet titanium Wave Ceptor (which I "splurged" on since it will be the last) my watch buying days come to a close.

....The whole collection...

View attachment 546616
What a nice collection?:)
Why don't you really tell us what you really think of the Casio brand!:p

May I ask why you opted for "0929Hours" for all of them to show, during your photo shoots?

OT: When >Claude< is asked "Why are watch photos 'always' show 1010Hours, on their dials?":
...Symmetry. At 10:10, the hour and minute hands form a wide, symmetrical "V" or smile shape, roughly mirrored around the vertical 12-6 axis. Human visual preference for symmetry makes this read as balanced and pleasant rather than lopsided the way, say, 8:20 or 4:40 would (interestingly close to mirror images of each other, but far less used)...
 
... My wife bought me a Tag watch, and so I have to say it's nice, but really it's just another of those faked-up luxury brands - nice case, but COTS mechanisms. You'd be surprised how many brands just buy in third party movements - watches are a con. Except maybe Casio.
Whether a COTS or an in-house movement is better depends on one's goals and perspective. Many of the COTS movements are made by ETA, which has various models, all of which are well engineered, keep good time, reliable, durable, etc. And every good watch repair shop knows ETA movements, so you have a lot of options for maintenance & repair. In practical terms, COTS are often as good as in-house movements, sometimes better. In that light, the desirability of high end boutique in-house movements is mainly (not completely, but mainly) about exclusivity and uniqueness.

To make an analogy to sports cars: the boutique in-house movement is like a Lambo, Ferrari, Gordon Murray, etc. - cool, flashy, unique, expensive. If people are into that, it's a free country, I'm not judging ;) But they're not the most reliable car, nor the most durable, and while their performance is good, it's not the best - you can get a car that is faster, better handling, quicker around the track, etc. for way less money.
 
Whether a COTS or an in-house movement is better depends on one's goals and perspective. Many of the COTS movements are made by ETA, which has various models, all of which are well engineered, keep good time, reliable, durable, etc. And every good watch repair shop knows ETA movements, so you have a lot of options for maintenance & repair. In practical terms, COTS are often as good as in-house movements, sometimes better. In that light, the desirability of high end boutique in-house movements is mainly (not completely, but mainly) about exclusivity and uniqueness.

To make an analogy to sports cars: the boutique in-house movement is like a Lambo, Ferrari, Gordon Murray, etc. - cool, flashy, unique, expensive. If people are into that, it's a free country, I'm not judging ;) But they're not the most reliable car, nor the most durable, and while their performance is good, it's not the best - you can get a car that is faster, better handling, quicker around the track, etc. for way less money.

I actually baby my watches with in house movements (Blancpain, Audemars Piguet) because they all had issues at some time that required very expensive service.
ETA is now more reserved with whom they sell movements to since they are owned by a watch group. But Selita basically does the omnipresent... the Selita SW200/300 and SW500 are the ETA2824 and Valojoux (then ETA) 7750 respectively. Awesome movements, both of them, and they can be modified and decorated to the hilt, so I find it utterly silly to regard them as pedestrian - in fact many luxury watches use them in modified form with some internal movement name, which I find misguiding. Panerai used to make no qualms about the using Unitas and Valjoux for many years... some of their "inhouse" movements these days look remarkably similar. :-)

I like movements to be eminently reliable. Many Rolex movements look very basic if you get to look at them (not sure which Rolex has a display back these days, the vast majority never did), but they are eminently robust, too. The Blancpain Triple Calendar movement was a nightmare for me. I got it fixed but after 2.5k I didn't dare wear that watch, super pretty as it is.
 
Last edited:
Currently wearing my Vero Open-water automatic Sellita movement dive-watch.
 
I actually baby my watches with in house movements (Blancpain, Audemars Piguet) because they all had issues at tsome time that required very expensive service.
ETA is now more reserved with whom they sell movements to snce they are owned by a watch group now. But Selita basically does th omnipresent... the Selita SW200/300 and SW500 are the ETA2824 and Valojoux (then ETA) 7750 respectively. Awesome movements, both of them, and they can be modified and decorated to the hilt, so I fins it utterly silly to regard them as pedestrian - in fact many luxury watches use tem in modified form using an internal movement name, which I find misguiding. Panerai used to make no qualms about the using Unitas and Valjoux for many years... some of their "inhouse" movements these days look remarkably similar. :-)

I like movements to be eminently reliable. Many Rolex movements look very basic if you look at them (not sure which Rolex has a display back these days, the vast majority never did), but they are eminently robust, too. The Bnlancpain Triple Calendar movement was a nightmare for me. I got it fixed but after 2.5k I dn't dare wear that watch, super pretty as it is.
I agree with you that Selita sw200 series and the ETA2824 are good movements keep good enough time along with easy to service. The Miyota 9000 series is good as well. I have the Seiko SKX-009 and SKX-173 with the e Seiko 7S26 automatic mechanical movement. real 'workhorse movements what don't keep the best time but they continue to chug along ! You have some nice watches !
 
For my birthday a Citizen Eco-Drive Super Titanium Armor (model CA7058-55E with movement B642).

This was the outcome of a long process of dealing with requirement specs, product research and failed trials.
  • I prefer Citizen Eco-Drive and probably don't need to explain myself on that.
  • I needed
    • Highly legible time display. I've a Citizen Absurd Atomic Everything Promaster that's great but not legible enough. In good light with my reading glasses I can get the time out of it in a few seconds. That's not good enough for the application in hand. I need something I can take a momentary glace under almost any conditions at and know the time.
    • Protected crown. My most elegant watch is a Hamilton Jazzmaster which is great. It's superbly legible too but from time to time and for no reason it stops because the crown got pulled out a click, dunno how but it's happened a few times. That makes it essentially unreliable.
    • Smooth integration of the band and case. I've a highly legible Citizen Garrison Weekender that's great with a partly protected crown and is excellently legible but the strap attaches with conventional lugs and spring pins and one time the strap detached under a tricky condition getting a J/M shelter dog through a door. I got it in my pocket and was able to put it back together later with a utility knife blade but...
This new one is big for my girlish wrists and hands but I'm getting on really well with it. It's more comfortable than all my other watches, which I cannot usually wear all day for comfort reasons. That's a well protected crown, wouldn't you say? Rotate the bezel, which has 4 detents, 90 degrees to reveal the half-recessed crown and chrono buttons. It's 105g, a good bit lighter than my Absurd Atomic Everything Promaster and light enough to ignore.

Bezel in normal position:

1787236629269.jpeg



Bezel rotated for crown and button access:

1787238416334.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom