This is a review and detailed measurements of the VTV Purifi class-D amplifier with the optional Weiss OP2-BA Op-amp (buffer/input gain stage). It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $2,090. I just reviewed the same amp but with SIL 994EnH-Ticha Pro buffer so you can compare them.
As with the other variation, I am a fan of the more slim rack mount case (it is a lot deeper than this photo shows):
Back panel as expected:
VTV Purifi class-D amplifier with the optional Weiss OP2-BA Op-amp Measurements
Let's start with our dashboard and see if the power supply noise we had with the SIL buffer also exists here thereby telling us if the problem was that or something else:
Sadly the issue remains with the noise in the FFT spectrum. So something else is at play. I tried to mess with grounding to see if it impacts it and it would get much worse. At one point one channel got unstable producing variable output. Maybe that was instrumentation error but I did not walk away with a good feeling on this. Nevertheless, overall ranking remains quite high due to stellar performance of Purifi amplifier module itself:
I am just going to post the rest of the measurements without text as they are similar as the other review:
When I ran the dashboard and saw the same problems with the other VTV amplifier, I wanted to rule out instrumentation error. So I dug up my Purifi reference design and it produced superbly clean output as it did in my original review. While I was at it, I also ran this test (which sadly I over-wrote) and it produced similar output to this VTV amplifier. So the choice of buffer doesn't have much impact here:
Conclusions
When I bought my latest car, it came with a fine scratch on the instrumentation cluster cover. Too lazy to take it back to be repaired. To this day it bothers me when I see it even though it doesn't impact anything on the operation of the car. Such is the case with this VTV Purifi amplifiers. In absolute terms they land way on top of the class. But looking carefully we see that something in the assembly and layout has caused performance to degrade objectively. It won't impact you in any way listening to it but just like my car, it shouldn't be there. Smaller companies building these boxes don't do any measurements and hence can't spot problems like this. So it is partly understandable but as consumers, we get to be ruthless in our demand in best in class execution. So I hope the company looks to resolve these problems as their prices are very attractive otherwise.
I can't recommend the VTV Purifi amplifiers based on these two versions I have tested.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
As with the other variation, I am a fan of the more slim rack mount case (it is a lot deeper than this photo shows):
Back panel as expected:
VTV Purifi class-D amplifier with the optional Weiss OP2-BA Op-amp Measurements
Let's start with our dashboard and see if the power supply noise we had with the SIL buffer also exists here thereby telling us if the problem was that or something else:
Sadly the issue remains with the noise in the FFT spectrum. So something else is at play. I tried to mess with grounding to see if it impacts it and it would get much worse. At one point one channel got unstable producing variable output. Maybe that was instrumentation error but I did not walk away with a good feeling on this. Nevertheless, overall ranking remains quite high due to stellar performance of Purifi amplifier module itself:
I am just going to post the rest of the measurements without text as they are similar as the other review:
When I ran the dashboard and saw the same problems with the other VTV amplifier, I wanted to rule out instrumentation error. So I dug up my Purifi reference design and it produced superbly clean output as it did in my original review. While I was at it, I also ran this test (which sadly I over-wrote) and it produced similar output to this VTV amplifier. So the choice of buffer doesn't have much impact here:
Conclusions
When I bought my latest car, it came with a fine scratch on the instrumentation cluster cover. Too lazy to take it back to be repaired. To this day it bothers me when I see it even though it doesn't impact anything on the operation of the car. Such is the case with this VTV Purifi amplifiers. In absolute terms they land way on top of the class. But looking carefully we see that something in the assembly and layout has caused performance to degrade objectively. It won't impact you in any way listening to it but just like my car, it shouldn't be there. Smaller companies building these boxes don't do any measurements and hence can't spot problems like this. So it is partly understandable but as consumers, we get to be ruthless in our demand in best in class execution. So I hope the company looks to resolve these problems as their prices are very attractive otherwise.
I can't recommend the VTV Purifi amplifiers based on these two versions I have tested.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.
Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/