my 4-way Swan 3.1-SB1000Pro speakers with Sehlin Perfectionist #4 CO mod measured from my listening position
View attachment 491626
Thanks! That looks incredibly flat, especially in the upper region Thanks for the post.
I thought I'd share some measurements from the original swans in a new location. The red line is a near perfect triangle with a 30 degree rotation offset. The green line for the couch is double the distance to the speakers, this setup is placement limited and subwoofer limited.The room is an unusual shape as well.You can see how bright the tweeter plays and the overall mid-high treble rise. Luckily this is easy to EQ out.
View attachment 491450
I've also included the distortion measurements. Not bad. Could also be limited by the ancient DAC and amp I'm using. The individual speakers measure closer to 2-3% distortion vs the 1.5% the pair averages together.
View attachment 491456
And last is the EQ. Very serious cuts to make the Harman curve. I'm starting to lean towards the Toole curve, as it seems less boomy in my room.
View attachment 491458View attachment 491459
I haven't seen a lot of measurements from the newer 3.1A's. These speakers are good enough that I would consider the same again later if these failed. How does the new stock compare with the upgraded crossover?
Edit: 6 years old, going very strong. This is with the selfish seat set up to take full advantage of the center room’s response. There’s a couch 5 ft behind it.
View attachment 491528
FYI... I also do a fair amount of EQ using the 10 band EQ available in Audirvana. I have 2 - 12" dayton subwoofers (sealed) and have always had a problem of getting enough bass without the boominess so I ended up running the subs at 60hz. and a fairly high gain level and run the main speakers full strength.
So, on a whim, I asked Chat GPT what would be the best set up using Audirvana EQ with the Swans and my subwoofer model. The answer surprized me. It said my set-up was wrong!!! It knew the specs of all my equiptment being used. Here's what I ended up with suggested by GPT...
Low shelf... 80hz... +3db gain
High shelf... 140hz... -1.5 gain... Q = 0.8 (GPT said THIS setting was the most important in order to get proper overlap) Also no bass bleed through to the upper end causing distortion.
Here's the interesting part... It said to turn the frequency knob all the way up on the plate amp!! (my plate amp is 180hz) Then adjust the gain/volume knob and phase switch by ear. Don't worry, the bass level is now being controlled by the EQ as it should be. The sub driver is now being used more openly and not restricted to just 60hz and below.
Normally this would be WAY too boomy. However, to my surprize, the bass was tighter than ever! I had to adjust the gain knob down from it's previous position. It sounded excellent with much more headroom.
IF there is a little boominess the +3db setting on the low shelf can be slightly reduced to your preference. (don't touch the frequency control knob on the sub) I'm still at +3db and happy with results. I turn down the gain/volume on the plate amp to control boominess.
One final note... I also ended up adding a bit of additional resolution to the upper mid.
using the standard bell EQ...
2500hz... +1.0 gain... Q = 0.8
I am shocked at how much cleaner, tighter and more refined the bass was. High/mid was clear with no harshness. I would never have thought of this myself. For sure I never would have placed the plate amp frequency up all the way but it brought out a part of the subwoofer I had clearly been missing. Highly recommended!