I hadn't read any 3.1 reviews but now that you mention it, the
review seems to confirm the lack of acoustic QC.
1) "without EQ, you may find the sound a bit annoying". That doesn't sound like a strong recommendation to me.
2) One speaker was measured. It would be informative to see measurements from both left and right speakers of a stereo pair.
3) The acoustic performance of the measured speaker may be quite far from the designer's acoustic target due to poor amplitude response consistency of the drivers but we cannot objectively confirm the measurements in this review.
4) The review is of a Sehlin modified 3.1. Sehlin wouldn't have modified the speaker if they thought the performance was optimal.I suspect they built a speaker that did not sufficiently resemble the designer's acoustic target because, as I found, the amplitude response consistency of the drivers is insufficient.
Once again, draw your own conclusions from the measurements I posted. I have no horse in this race. If you built the speaker and you're happy with it, great. If you're wondering why it may not sound as good as you had hoped for, poor driver QC could be the reason.
I didn't see any option to flag my account as industry participant when I registered. Perhaps I missed it.
What's your affiliation with HiVi and/or their dealers/distributors?