• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Very Nice Cheap Kit Speakers: HiVi/Swans DIY 2.2A & 3.1

Harmonie

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 30, 2020
Messages
1,927
Likes
2,085
Location
France
@Poultrygeist
Just wondering how long you REALLY need to assemble, before you enjoy the sound ?
When you add the estimated time of each process as their video indicates, you should finish these in just 1 hour and 3 minutes ?? :rolleyes:
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
@Poultrygeist
Just wondering how long you REALLY need to assemble, before you enjoy the sound ?
When you add the estimated time of each process as their video indicates, you should finish these in just 1 hour and 3 minutes ?? :rolleyes:

I'm running out of projects so I need to slow down and enjoy the journey.
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
If you build these you should assemble the grills and use them. The soft dome tweeters protrude and need to be protected. They will deform with the slightest pressure. Swan includes these frames with grooves and all you need is a putty knife to tuck the stretchy fabric into the grooves. Mine seem to be holding ok without glue.

P1010001 4.jpeg
 

stevenswall

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 10, 2019
Messages
1,366
Likes
1,075
Location
Orem, UT
Listening in near field at no more than 3 ft and they are quite impressive.

View attachment 85199

What amp do you use? ASR makes me think every amp is poorly engineered, and I hate the scratching sound and imbalanced channels on my Dayton amp similar to the reviewed Amazon Basics one.

Hopefully yours doesn't hiss from that close? I'm using mine nearfield too.
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
I actually use one that ASR recommends and which measures well, the Volt+D.

For it's extra gain I also use an FX Audio Tube 01 preamp.
 
OP
GGroch

GGroch

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Messages
1,059
Likes
2,053
Location
Denver, Colorado
I subjectively believe my 2.2a is more critical of amps than many speakers. It works well with the high power (old NAD 2600a) amp I tried. They sound great with my 3e Audio DIY TPA3255 amp (and I think would sound near the same with commercial TPA3255 amps). My new Sabaj A20a amp sounds great (similar to SMSL DA9) with dual Infineon chips. So, I think most 3255 or Infineon class D amps would be a good match. The Sabaj has a digital volume control...so no mismatched channels.

The other inexpensive class D amps I tried were not as successful.
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
I've also used a single ended APPJ/Miniwatt ( 2.5 watts pictured above ) paired with the FX preamp with excellent results.
 

Albrecht47

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
12
Likes
12
Location
Canada
Below is a graph with the amplitude response of eight HiVi SD1.1A tweeters , seven from the same batch. Measured at 1M and mounted in a bookshelf speaker cabinet. Note the SPL difference at the 2KHz cursor position. That's a spread of 11.4dB.

I will leave you to draw your own conclusion regarding Hivi quality control ( or lack-there-of).

hivi sd11a.jpg
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
Below is a graph with the amplitude response of eight HiVi SD1.1A tweeters , seven from the same batch. Measured at 1M and mounted in a bookshelf speaker cabinet. Note the SPL difference at the 2KHz cursor position. That's a spread of 11.4dB.

I will leave you to draw your own conclusion regarding Hivi quality control ( or lack-there-of).

View attachment 135334
So how did they sound when you listened to them in the HiVi 2.2a? What speaker company do you work for?
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
I lifted this post from the X-LS Encore thread comparing it to the HiVi 2.2a.

"10 years ago GR Research sold these for $125 and that is when I built mine. I use them in my computer room / den and use them as computer speakers. I built the cabinets myself destroying my brother-in-laws old router. For the same money now I can tell you the HIVI 2.2A DIY on Amazon for $239 are a way better deal and comes with a knockdown cabinet and sounds infinitely better imho."
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
Posted this as warning to DIY builders using HiVi drivers. Consultant to many speaker companies. I don't build kit speakers because I design my own.

Few of us have a need to buy that many tweeters at one time so I knew you were in the business. I found no variance with the two tweeters that came in the kit from Amazon. It's possible yours were seconds.
 

Albrecht47

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
12
Likes
12
Location
Canada
Few of us have a need to buy that many tweeters at one time so I knew you were in the business. I found no variance with the two tweeters that came in the kit from Amazon. It's possible yours were seconds.

Any chance you could post the measurements of your tweeters? I'm curious about how you define no variance.
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
Any chance you could post the measurements of your tweeters? I'm curious about how you define no variance.

A sound meter confirmed the output levels that I heard. Aren't you supposed to register as an industry participant when you post here? I don't know if you read the reviews here but the HiVi 3.1 received a strong recommendation with no mention of any quality issues.
 
Last edited:

Albrecht47

Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
12
Likes
12
Location
Canada
A sound meter confirmed the output levels that I heard. Aren't you supposed to register as an industry participant when you post here? I don't know if you read the reviews here but the HiVi 3.1 received a strong recommendation with no mention of any quality issues.



I hadn't read any 3.1 reviews but now that you mention it, the review seems to confirm the lack of acoustic QC.

1) "without EQ, you may find the sound a bit annoying". That doesn't sound like a strong recommendation to me.

2) One speaker was measured. It would be informative to see measurements from both left and right speakers of a stereo pair.

3) The acoustic performance of the measured speaker may be quite far from the designer's acoustic target due to poor amplitude response consistency of the drivers but we cannot objectively confirm the measurements in this review.

4) The review is of a Sehlin modified 3.1. Sehlin wouldn't have modified the speaker if they thought the performance was optimal.I suspect they built a speaker that did not sufficiently resemble the designer's acoustic target because, as I found, the amplitude response consistency of the drivers is insufficient.

Once again, draw your own conclusions from the measurements I posted. I have no horse in this race. If you built the speaker and you're happy with it, great. If you're wondering why it may not sound as good as you had hoped for, poor driver QC could be the reason.

I didn't see any option to flag my account as industry participant when I registered. Perhaps I missed it.

What's your affiliation with HiVi and/or their dealers/distributors?
 

Poultrygeist

Active Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
270
Likes
231
I hadn't read any 3.1 reviews but now that you mention it, the review seems to confirm the lack of acoustic QC.

1) "without EQ, you may find the sound a bit annoying". That doesn't sound like a strong recommendation to me.

2) One speaker was measured. It would be informative to see measurements from both left and right speakers of a stereo pair.

3) The acoustic performance of the measured speaker may be quite far from the designer's acoustic target due to poor amplitude response consistency of the drivers but we cannot objectively confirm the measurements in this review.

4) The review is of a Sehlin modified 3.1. Sehlin wouldn't have modified the speaker if they thought the performance was optimal.I suspect they built a speaker that did not sufficiently resemble the designer's acoustic target because, as I found, the amplitude response consistency of the drivers is insufficient.

Once again, draw your own conclusions from the measurements I posted. I have no horse in this race. If you built the speaker and you're happy with it, great. If you're wondering why it may not sound as good as you had hoped for, poor driver QC could be the reason.

I didn't see any option to flag my account as industry participant when I registered. Perhaps I missed it.

What's your affiliation with HiVi and/or their dealers/distributors?

Might I remind you that this thread is about the HiVi Swan kit speakers sold on Amazon. Unless you built the Amazon kit and tested those same tweeters your graph and warnings about quality are not relevant to this discussion. Now if you design speakers for competing companies your negative statements could also be considered unethical. I enjoyed builting these kit speakers and made favorable comments so I have a stake in this discussion. It looks like you joined this forum a few days ago just to rain on this parade. If that's the case I feel sorry for you.
 
Top Bottom