• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Verum Audio Verum 2 Headphone Review

Rate this headphone:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 9 5.3%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 7 4.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 62 36.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 92 54.1%

  • Total voters
    170

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
49,398
Likes
292,717
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of Verum Audio Verum 2 planar magnetic open back headphones. It was drop shipped by the company and costs US $425.
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone review.jpg

As you see, this is a "high bling" headphone when it comes to design with so much intricate details. It is a bit much for me but I imagine others are into it.

There are different versions of this kit. Mine has a set of thinner pads. Stock ones are quite a bit deeper and that is what I used for the review. The large cups make the headphone comfortable to wear and easy to measure. Two sets of cables are provided as well: a 3.5mm and an XLR.

Measurements you are about to see are on GRAS 45CA, controlled by Audio Precision APx555 audio analyzer. Measurements of headphones is text fixture specific so don't focus too narrowly on the details.

Verum 2 Heapdhone Measurements
As usual, we start with our headphone frequency response measurement and compare it to our target (referenced to 94 dBSPL @ 425 Hz):
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone frequency response measurement.png

While tracking is not perfect (to our target), there is an uptick in bass which did not exist in version 1. There is a bit of excess energy from 600 Hz to 2 kHz. There is possibly too much high treble energy as well. We will have to adjudicate these with equalization and listening tests. Some EQ is very likely to be needed regardless:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone target frequency response measurement.png


The next measurement, distortion took my breath away:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone relative distortion measurement.png

Just incredible! Even 114 dBSPL doesn't cause this headphone to even notice let alone blink! In the company kickstarter campaign, the designer showed my distortion measurements of Verum 2 indicating a target for improvement. I say mission accomplished!

Absolute distortion is not a reliable metric for headphones but even it shows very nice performance:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone THD distortion measurement.png


The angled cups combined with large distance to artificial ears in the measurement fixture shows a lot of group delay, indicating likely reflections:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone Group delay measurement.png

The data here is not prescriptive so we will have to listen.

Sensitivity is better than average:
Best open back planar magnetic headphone review.png


Impedance however, is very low, meaning you need current, not voltage to drive it to loud levels:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone impedance measurement.png


Translation: just about any source should generate very usable loudness. But for maximum playback levels, you should get a good headphone amplifier. My Topping DX5II "normal" listening level is around -25 dB using unbalanced output. For very loud listening, I went as low at -9 dB.

Verum 2 Headphone Listening Tests and Equalization
As is typical of headphones not matching our target, especially in bass, the out of box impression was that of rather flat sounding. So I pulled out the EQ tools and fairly quickly developed a set of filters:
Verum Audio Verum 2 open back planar magnetic headphone Equalization EQ parametric filters.png

This, combined with super spatial qualities of this headphone generate startling fidelity the likes of which I have forgotten! :) Track after track sounded just stunning. Instruments and vocals all separated around and behind my head with detail to die for in reference tracks. So much so that I am listening to the Verum 2 right after I took the review picture.

Surprisingly, turning off the EQ did not make a dramatic difference. The sound simply gets less exciting and a bit brighter. It is totally listenable without EQ.

Conclusions
The Verum 2 breaks new ground in how low its distortion is -- likely the best I have ever measured. This makes it a perfect canvas to paint your favorite EQ on top of it. Stock tuning is good enough but EQ takes it to the next level, or should I say very high level. Price is quite reasonable as well. Nice fit and finish puts the cherry on top. Hopefully version 3 eliminates the need for EQ, giving us one perfect headphone!

I am going to recommend the Verum Audio Verum 2 without EQ. With EQ, it delivers incredibly performance that puts a smile on your face, track after track.
-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

This has very mixed feelings for me. On one side it's very low distortion and on the other uneven highs that are hard to EQ. So maybe next iteration could be a charm if they fix highs. I don't think cyber punk looks do them much good with serious pricing they ware.
 
It appears from the Verum Audio order page linked below that this sample now sells for $499 and other available colorways (Red or Black) ship with a case for the same price.


EDIT - I now see 'GR Research' is offering the Verum 2 headphone for $425.
 
Last edited:
I use the Earphones Archive B&K 5128 graph as a reference for my Verum 2 PEQ profile. Excellent headphones with some EQ.


Screenshot 2025-12-21 at 08.46.15.png
 
Lots of great headphones in the world. As good as it is I probably don’t need to get the one made by an unapologetic racist. Ironically the best summary of his statements and unapologetic apology is on Headphonesty, which I’ve been asked not to link.
 
This has very mixed feelings for me. On one side it's very low distortion and on the other uneven highs that are hard to EQ. So maybe next iteration could be a charm if they fix highs. I don't think cyber punk looks do them much good with serious pricing they ware.
The circular earpads and geometry causes some of this uneveness. Upon 5k it could be hard to detect at all and only tested with the own biological sound detector system 'ear' and a frequency generator. If you do the test, you most likely get different results as with measurements. But no big deal at all IMHO, the spikes are close enough not to hear them clearly. So a wide band correction is sufficient.
 
Great to see more and more competetive headphones in this price range, but not exactly what I wanted to see while my para 2s are being delivered.
 
Great to see more and more competetive headphones in this price range, but not exactly what I wanted to see while my para 2s are being delivered.
Para 2 is a bit lighter and more comfortable to wear. That's what I had on before testing the Verum 2.
 
Lots of great headphones in the world. As good as it is I probably don’t need to get the one made by an unapologetic racist. Ironically the best summary of his statements and unapologetic apology is on Headphonesty, which I’ve been asked not to link.
Wow ... we all are on our way and learn through experience. If this is part of the lesson, be it. Carefully ... it's so easy to get part of the game you want to avoid.
 
Lots of great headphones in the world. As good as it is I probably don’t need to get the one made by an unapologetic racist. Ironically the best summary of his statements and unapologetic apology is on Headphonesty, which I’ve been asked not to link.
Thank you for clarifying all that. I wasn't aware of this controversy, I went to check it out, and it's really awful. Verum Audio is definitely and forever off my list.

And I know this has nothing to do with the quality of the product itself, but at this point, it's important for people to know what kind of person they're dealing with.
 
The circular earpads and geometry causes some of this uneveness. Upon 5k it could be hard to detect at all and only tested with the own biological sound detector system 'ear' and a frequency generator. If you do the test, you most likely get different results as with measurements. But no big deal at all IMHO, the spikes are close enough not to hear them clearly. So a wide band correction is sufficient.
IIR (PEQ) ain't really best option above 2 KHz, broken timber is not a future it's broken. They can take a lot of EQ-ing and in this case FIR is a better choice when you can go with it (latency is not crucial). I really don't see reason for 5 KHz anomaly in group delay or related to design (enclosure/cups) so I believe that they can fix it. They lack bass slam (driver property for all electrostatic and planar) but have lots of group delay starting at 1 KHz. In time you learn it's not as simple as measurement frequency plot shows. There are qualities ralated to physics and natural to our psy and you can not correct it all in time domain increasing the amplitude but at best hope to mimic it. This brings us back to why it's hard to EQ highs in the first place and when it's not focused even FIR doesn't work along with differences in our ears (shape of the shell and ear chenel along with health state of it) that influence it.
Edit: probably even simple paper filter mod could improve focus in highs.
 
Thanks @amirm for review. As you've mentioned - one of the sources of information of further improvement was you review of Verum 1 on ASR. And it clearly helped!
Same with this review - I already see a room for improvements.

Want to mention that Verum 2 weight is about 455 grams ( +- 5 grams due to it's hand-built nature).

20251221_113737.jpg


Second (more narrow hybrid pads) that also come with a kit are closer to your target in HF region. Another geometry + use of fabric instead of leather decrease internal reflections.

Thanks again!
 
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of Verum Audio Verum 2 planar magnetic open back headphones. It was drop shipped by the company and costs US $425.
View attachment 498729
As you see, this is a "high bling" headphone when it comes to design with so much intricate details. It is a bit much for me but I imagine others are into it.

There are different versions of this kit. Mine has a set of thinner pads. Stock ones are quite a bit deeper and that is what I used for the review. The large cups make the headphone comfortable to wear and easy to measure. Two sets of cables are provided as well: a 3.5mm and an XLR.

Measurements you are about to see are on GRAS 45CA, controlled by Audio Precision APx555 audio analyzer. Measurements of headphones is text fixture specific so don't focus too narrowly on the details.

Verum 2 Heapdhone Measurements
As usual, we start with our headphone frequency response measurement and compare it to our target (referenced to 94 dBSPL @ 425 Hz):
View attachment 498730
While tracking is not perfect (to our target), there is an uptick in bass which did not exist in version 1. There is a bit of excess energy from 600 Hz to 2 kHz. There is possibly too much high treble energy as well. We will have to adjudicate these with equalization and listening tests. Some EQ is very likely to be needed regardless:
View attachment 498731

The next measurement, distortion took my breath away:
View attachment 498732
Just incredible! Even 114 dBSPL doesn't cause this headphone to even notice let alone blink! In the company kickstarter campaign, the designer showed my distortion measurements of Verum 2 indicating a target for improvement. I say mission accomplished!

Absolute distortion is not a reliable metric for headphones but even it shows very nice performance:
View attachment 498733

The angled cups combined with large distance to artificial ears in the measurement fixture shows a lot of group delay, indicating likely reflections:
View attachment 498734
The data here is not prescriptive so we will have to listen.

Sensitivity is better than average:
View attachment 498735

Impedance however, is very low, meaning you need current, not voltage to drive it to loud levels:
View attachment 498736

Translation: just about any source should generate very usable loudness. But for maximum playback levels, you should get a good headphone amplifier. My Topping DX5II "normal" listening level is around -25 dB using unbalanced output. For very loud listening, I went as low at -9 dB.

Verum 2 Headphone Listening Tests and Equalization
As is typical of headphones not matching our target, especially in bass, the out of box impression was that of rather flat sounding. So I pulled out the EQ tools and fairly quickly developed a set of filters:
View attachment 498737
This, combined with super spatial qualities of this headphone generate startling fidelity the likes of which I have forgotten! :) Track after track sounded just stunning. Instruments and vocals all separated around and behind my head with detail to die for in reference tracks. So much so that I am listening to the Verum 2 right after I took the review picture.

Surprisingly, turning off the EQ did not make a dramatic difference. The sound simply gets less exciting and a bit brighter. It is totally listenable without EQ.

Conclusions
The Verum 2 breaks new ground in how low its distortion is -- likely the best I have ever measured. This makes it a perfect canvas to paint your favorite EQ on top of it. Stock tuning is good enough but EQ takes it to the next level, or should I say very high level. Price is quite reasonable as well. Nice fit and finish puts the cherry on top. Hopefully version 3 eliminates the need for EQ, giving us one perfect headphone!

I am going to recommend the Verum Audio Verum 2 without EQ. With EQ, it delivers incredibly performance that puts a smile on your face, track after track.
-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
Amir, you said "For very loud listening, I went as low at -9 dB." Did you mean "...as high as..."?
 
Hi @Igor_S,

I watched a YT video where your compatriot Pavlo showed covers that transform Verum 2 into closed back headphones. Do you plan to make them available for purchase? If so, it would be nice to see measured performance with these covers on as they would definitely alter FR. I've seen this approach implemented by another Ukrainian headphone manufacturer Sash Audio, but unfortunately the FR graph showed a complete mess with the covers on (in the case of Sash Tres SE headphones). I'm curious about your implementation.

 
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of Verum Audio Verum 2 planar magnetic open back headphones. It was drop shipped by the company and costs US $425.
View attachment 498729
As you see, this is a "high bling" headphone when it comes to design with so much intricate details. It is a bit much for me but I imagine others are into it.

There are different versions of this kit. Mine has a set of thinner pads. Stock ones are quite a bit deeper and that is what I used for the review. The large cups make the headphone comfortable to wear and easy to measure. Two sets of cables are provided as well: a 3.5mm and an XLR.

Measurements you are about to see are on GRAS 45CA, controlled by Audio Precision APx555 audio analyzer. Measurements of headphones is text fixture specific so don't focus too narrowly on the details.

Verum 2 Heapdhone Measurements
As usual, we start with our headphone frequency response measurement and compare it to our target (referenced to 94 dBSPL @ 425 Hz):
View attachment 498730
While tracking is not perfect (to our target), there is an uptick in bass which did not exist in version 1. There is a bit of excess energy from 600 Hz to 2 kHz. There is possibly too much high treble energy as well. We will have to adjudicate these with equalization and listening tests. Some EQ is very likely to be needed regardless:
View attachment 498731

The next measurement, distortion took my breath away:
View attachment 498732
Just incredible! Even 114 dBSPL doesn't cause this headphone to even notice let alone blink! In the company kickstarter campaign, the designer showed my distortion measurements of Verum 2 indicating a target for improvement. I say mission accomplished!

Absolute distortion is not a reliable metric for headphones but even it shows very nice performance:
View attachment 498733

The angled cups combined with large distance to artificial ears in the measurement fixture shows a lot of group delay, indicating likely reflections:
View attachment 498734
The data here is not prescriptive so we will have to listen.

Sensitivity is better than average:
View attachment 498735

Impedance however, is very low, meaning you need current, not voltage to drive it to loud levels:
View attachment 498736

Translation: just about any source should generate very usable loudness. But for maximum playback levels, you should get a good headphone amplifier. My Topping DX5II "normal" listening level is around -25 dB using unbalanced output. For very loud listening, I went as low at -9 dB.

Verum 2 Headphone Listening Tests and Equalization
As is typical of headphones not matching our target, especially in bass, the out of box impression was that of rather flat sounding. So I pulled out the EQ tools and fairly quickly developed a set of filters:
View attachment 498737
This, combined with super spatial qualities of this headphone generate startling fidelity the likes of which I have forgotten! :) Track after track sounded just stunning. Instruments and vocals all separated around and behind my head with detail to die for in reference tracks. So much so that I am listening to the Verum 2 right after I took the review picture.

Surprisingly, turning off the EQ did not make a dramatic difference. The sound simply gets less exciting and a bit brighter. It is totally listenable without EQ.

Conclusions
The Verum 2 breaks new ground in how low its distortion is -- likely the best I have ever measured. This makes it a perfect canvas to paint your favorite EQ on top of it. Stock tuning is good enough but EQ takes it to the next level, or should I say very high level. Price is quite reasonable as well. Nice fit and finish puts the cherry on top. Hopefully version 3 eliminates the need for EQ, giving us one perfect headphone!

I am going to recommend the Verum Audio Verum 2 without EQ. With EQ, it delivers incredibly performance that puts a smile on your face, track after track.
-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/

Here are some thoughts about the EQ.
Please report your findings, positive or negative!

Notes about the EQ design:
  • The average L/R is used to calculate the score.
  • The resolution is 12 points per octave interpolated from the raw data (provided by @amirm)
  • A Genetic Algorithm is used to optimize the EQ.
  • The EQ Score is designed to MAXIMIZE the Score WHILE fitting the Harman target curve (and other constraints) with a fixed complexity.
    This will avoid weird results if one only optimizes for the Score, start your journey here or there.
    There is a presentation by S. Olive here.
    It will probably flatten the Error regression doing so, the tonal balance should be therefore more neutral.
  • The EQs are starting point and may require tuning (certainly at LF and maybe at HF).
  • The range around and above 10kHz is usually not EQed unless smooth enough to do so.
  • I am using PEQ (PK) as from my experience the definition is more consistent across different DSP/platform implementations than shelves.
  • With some HP/amp combo, the boosts and preamp gain (loss of Dynamic range) need to be carefully considered to avoid issues with, amongst other things, too low a Max SPL or damaging your device. You have beed warned.
  • Not all units of the same product are made equal. The EQ is based on the measurements of a single unit. YMMV with regard to the very unit you are trying this EQ on.
  • I sometimes use variations of the Harman curve for some reasons. See rational here and here
  • NOTE: the score then calculated is not comparable to the scores derived from the default Harman target curve if not otherwise noted


OK L/R match.

I have generated one EQ, the APO config file is attached.

Score no EQ: 83.8
Score Amirm: 76.6
Score with EQ: 89.8

Verum 2 APO EQ Score Flat@HF 96000Hz.png
 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom