Would you recommend over small Genelecs?Great near field, desktop speakers.
Near 8020 performance for the price of 8010 and with ARC. Hard to beat IMHO.Would you recommend over small Genelecs?
I was actually considering the KH80..Near 8020 performance for the price of 8010 and with ARC. Hard to beat IMHO.
And I also recommend KH80 which is considered a step up from iLoud MTM yet still not overly expensive.
Choose wisely.
Well. Tonal wise I would expect KH80 to be more accurate. But as S6 has all the other features it's really hard to say. From my last time demoing S6 in the store it was very dry and mid focused. But definitely not ideal positioning.I was actually considering the KH80..
I currently own the Presonus Spectre S6, and I'm not sure if the KH80 is going to be a down step
Depend on where you are, the iLoud and 8020D are only separated by 10€ here, and I'd trust the 8020D a lot more for reliability and volume. Still, the iLoud is quite impressive; I'd just like to know at what point it goes into distorsion hell, as it could be anywhere between 86 and 96 dB.Near 8020 performance for the price of 8010 and with ARC. Hard to beat IMHO.
And I also recommend KH80 which is considered a step up from iLoud MTM yet still not overly expensive.
Choose wisely.
Wow—$350 vs $535 in the US (each). And you're more likely to find the iLouds on sale than Genelecs. They were $280 Cyber Monday, nearly half the costs of the 8020Ds. But yeah, you can't go wrong with Genelecs, I think.Depend on where you are, the iLoud and 8020D are only separated by 10€ here...
I think that's overstating it a bit. There is sufficient capability for volume, it's just that some music, especially at wide-open settings, will rob the headroom. So, I disagree with "if and only if". I think this paragraph from this SOS review sums it up fairly well:Good if and only if you're listening fairly quiet (<86dB SPL).
Perhaps not surprisingly, the biggest issue for the iLoud MTM is bass. There is no avoiding the fact that it is very small and that true accuracy (in both time and frequency domains) at low frequencies, especially with any aspirations to play loud, requires a lot of air to be moved very quickly. So, to my ears, with the LF EQ option set to 40Hz, the iLoud MTM is somewhat out of its depth as soon as any high levels of deep bass come along. Subjectively, the bass becomes slow and dynamically compromised — it's almost as if there's a compressor operating. There was also occasionally the unmistakable sound of distortion and port noise (although I did rather try and provoke it). But things are different with the LF EQ set to 50 or 60 Hz and/or the LF shelf EQ set to attenuate. The iLoud MTM becomes much more quick–witted and able to do justice to the material. It can also play at a significantly higher level without sounding strained, although having said that it's always going to struggle against more conventionally dimensioned monitors. Most of my listening was subsequently done with the LF EQ at 60Hz, or sometimes at 50Hz with the LF shelving cut engaged.
Billie Eilish's "bad guy", I admit, sounds pretty awesome on a really loud system, but on these you can only listen at a respectable level without EQing.
Agreed, I think it's plenty loud too, just an example of types of music that can't be played as loud as others—really, I haven't played a "worst case" that's a problem for me with level, and 90+% of what I put through them can be played too loud. Keeping in mind I have the low cutoff set to 50 Hz, not 40. Basically, the 40 Hz bottom comes with an asterisk—if you really intend to play bottom heavy music at that setting, you can't blast it.I played that earlier and it was plenty loud for me (and my son). They are perfect for nearfield use in my small home office (2.7m x 2.0m).
Treating them like my other speakers seems to be helping - aimed mostly straight ahead now. Seems to have taken some of the edge off.
"Desk" cal sounds awful, it just neuters the bass.
They still sound mid-forward and...resonant. Makes me keep turning them down. We'll see if I can fix that. More tomorrow.