• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Review

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,657
Likes
240,885
Location
Seattle Area
This is a detailed measurements of the Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1. It is on kind loan from the company and costs US $3,499. I am in mail it back so please excuse the brevity of this write-up.

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Review.jpg


Measurements that you are about to see were performed using the Klippel Near-field Scanner (NFS). This is a robotic measurement system that analyzes the speaker all around and is able (using advanced mathematics and dual scan) to subtract room reflections (so where I measure it doesn't matter). It also measures the speaker at close distance ("near-field") which sharply reduces the impact of room noise. Both of these factors enable testing in ordinary rooms yet results that can be more accurate than anechoic chamber. In a nutshell, the measurements show the actual sound coming out of the speaker independent of the room.

All measurements are referenced to the tweeter axis with frequency resolution of 2.7 Hz.

Spinorama Audio Measurements
Acoustic measurements can be grouped in a way that can be perceptually analyzed to determine how good a speaker can be used. This so called spinorama shows us just about everything we need to know about the speaker with respect to tonality and some flaws:

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Spinorama CEA-2034 Audio Measurements.png


The AL-1 could certainly benefit from level equalization of the drivers.

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Spinorama CEA-2034 PIR Audio Measurements.png


Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Spinorama CEA-2034 Early Relfections Audio Measurements.png


Impedance is a bit higher than average for the class which is appreciated:

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Impedance measurements.png


Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Horizontal directivity measurements.png


Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Vertical directivity measurements.png


Distortion graphs are now at calibrated SPL level of 1 kHz tone at 96 dB SPL at 1 meter:

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Relative Distortion measurements.png


And for compatibility with measurements posted by others:

Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Distortion measurements.png


Finally the waterfall:
Verdant Audio Bambusa AL-1 Speaker Waterfall CSD measurements.png


Conclusions
It is clear that by standards with which we measure speakers, the performance of AL-1 does not measure up. I appreciate the company sending them to us though for evaluation.

-----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Allergies are killing me on top of heavy review workload. I hope you all feel sorry for me by donating using : https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

  • Bambusa AL-1 Verdant Audio.zip
    82.7 KB · Views: 127

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,146
Likes
8,716
Location
NYC
This one looks a lot better to me than the MG-1, personally. EQ the mids down and maybe listen a little off axis and you should be good to go. Horizontal directivity looks well controlled for a cone and dome and even vertical isn't too bad. Overall less of a direcitivty mismatch than its more expensive sibling, and imo better on-axis/LW too.

Dunno about sound out of the box and how much that bump in the mids will affect things, but if you're willing to EQ this seems like the better bet to me.
 
Last edited:

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,194
Likes
16,916
Location
Central Fl
$3495.00 for 2 small drivers and a wooden box?
No thanks
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,759
Likes
37,608
This one looks mid-range centric, and very EQ'able. Did you listen to it even briefly? I'd think it might be very serviceable for music if one isn't picky. More so with some EQ.

I'd not consider it a good value, but hardly a broken design. They appear to only need some improvement in cross-over handling to be pretty good.
 

MZKM

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
4,250
Likes
11,556
Location
Land O’ Lakes, FL
I know it uses a SEAS tweeter that's ~$250/pair (with no bulk order discount), but I can't help but think the ~$30/pair Peerless BC25TG15-04 gives similar performance for much cheaper.

https://hificompass.com/en/speakers/measurements/peerless/peerless-bc25tg15-04
https://hificompass.com/en/speakers/measurements/seas/seas-t25cf001

Peerless:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.30.26 PM.png

SEAS:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.30.43 PM.png

Peerless:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.32.15 PM.png

SEAS:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.32.25 PM.png

Peerless (~99dB):
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.34.16 PM.png

SEAS (~98dB):
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.34.55 PM.png

Peerless:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.36.48 PM.png

SEAS:
Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 5.37.05 PM.png

________________________

To make this speaker more competitive, having the Kimber wiring and WBT binding posts as a Level 1 upgrade (silver upgrade as Level 2) and offering regular wiring and binding posts as the default would be something I would consider.
 
Last edited:

taisho

Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
56
Likes
76
Location
Poland
I only wonder why the company sent it to Amir. They could try some audiophile sites that don't post brutal raw data and reviews look like a poem about audio equipment. Bamboo speakers would surely incite their imagination. These are not bad per se but bad for the price.
 

Billy Budapest

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 11, 2019
Messages
1,852
Likes
2,772
I only wonder why the company sent it to Amir. They could try some audiophile sites that don't post brutal raw data and reviews look like a poem about audio equipment. Bamboo speakers would surely incite their imagination. These are not bad per se but bad for the price.
My guess is that they want to know what the flaws are so they can release a version 1.1 with a reengineered crossover.
 

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,146
Likes
8,716
Location
NYC
This one looks mid-range centric, and very EQ'able. Did you listen to it even briefly? I'd think it might be very serviceable for music if one isn't picky. More so with some EQ.

I'd not consider it a good value, but hardly a broken design. They appear to only need some improvement in cross-over handling to be pretty good.

Agreed, and the preference score suggests so too - most of the badness is in the smoothness of the PIR score, which is mainly affected by that wide midrange hump. But there are minimal directivity issues there so you can EQ very easily. Horizontal directivity is mostly wide too, which is nice if you like that as I do.

It's not a bang for your buck speaker, but not sure it's fair to expect that from a smallish, made in the USA manufacturer seemingly using relatively expensive parts. Not every speaker needs to be a good value. Whenever Amir gets around to testing his Salon 2's I'm willing to bet good money they aren't going to measure/score as pretty as the Genelec's...

I also think ASR has been a bit spoiled by mostly testing speakers in the "pretty good" camp. Our perspective is skewed because aside from a few speakers too cheap or old to possibly measure good, Amir has mostly tested speakers you would expect decent performance from. KEF, JBL, Revel... Pick a few random speakers from Soundstage network's speakermeasurements.com and see how many of them do great by our standards.:)

Not saying you should run out and buy these but there are some genuinely good qualities here.
 
Last edited:

GXAlan

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
3,921
Likes
6,054
I only wonder why the company sent it to Amir. They could try some audiophile sites that don't post brutal raw data and reviews look like a poem about audio equipment. Bamboo speakers would surely incite their imagination. These are not bad per se but bad for the price.

Ignoring price, it has a better preference score than the KEF LS50 so it's not horrible. I also think there are some customers who like the colored sounds for their speakers. I think the success of the B&W Diamond series is evidence of that: https://www.stereophile.com/content/bowers-wilkins-802-d3-diamond-loudspeaker-measurements

In contrast, the JBL Studio 530 never really hit it big with consumers (until it went to firesale pricing). Same with the Infinity speakers -- those should be killer at places like Best Buy, but we don't see it being popular at brick and mortar retailers and only gained popularity once it went to firesale pricing.

Time will tell how the HDI series sells.
 

ctrl

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,633
Likes
6,240
Location
.de, DE, DEU

Itay

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Messages
6
Likes
24
IMHO this speaker is a collection of high quality components all a round, but with a poor crossover design. a great example of just how important is the design of the crossover itself...
 

spacevector

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Dec 3, 2019
Messages
553
Likes
1,003
Location
Bayrea
If the manufacturer plans to continue selling this speaker as-is, they could spin it as "designed for corner room placement" to get that corner loading bass boost leading, hopefully, to eventual balanced presentation.
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,657
Likes
240,885
Location
Seattle Area
FYI I shipped the speaker back already. Had so many boxes piled up to be shipped that I needed to send it back today (I try to mail things no more than once a week due to social distancing).
 
Top Bottom