Yes, I would say you need to go at least to 10khz so you test both the woofer and tweeter properly.Thanks for the link to the tone generator. So I tested tones from 20 to 200 with no out of the norm sounds that I could hear. Was starting to get a bit fatigued going higher. Would I need to go higher?
Having bought a lot of used equipment over the years I can assure you people are this stupid when it comes to safe packaging.Something sounds really odd about this transaction. Can't imagine the seller was the actual owner. Anyone who owned these would be more careful shipping and wouldn't drop the price by $500 so quickly. Too bad it's not easy to verify if the speakers were stolen.
Seller definitely got a good deal. It’s the buyer who didn’t get a good deal. That’s where a lot of us are throwing our virtual hands up in the air/facepalming while also trying to not to overly be harsh on the OP or relishing in someone else’s misfortune.He got a good deal getting 300.
I think $75 is undercutting it a bit. They work fine, it's just a few chips. They sell used here for around $650 so while I agree paying $300 was generous, there's always someone who will ignore some cosmetic issues to get a great speaker they couldn't afford otherwise.Seller definitely got a good deal. It’s the buyer who didn’t get a good deal. That’s where a lot of us are throwing our virtual hands up in the air/facepalming while also trying to not to overly be harsh on the OP or relishing in someone else’s misfortune.
But $300 isn’t a lot of money in the grand scheme of things for the lesson learned.
Those speakers can probably be resold for about $75 at best. But if the OP is happy with the $300 purchase for the experience of the speakers right now this very second, it’s admittedly true that even though the speakers are only worth $75, supply of damaged M16’s also means that if he had $75 on his pocket, he cannot go out to buy said damaged speakers for $75.
Do the speakers still function properly? Is it just damage to the finish or is the box compromised otherwise?
Doubt that scuff itself is an issue, and looks like overall there's no movement in the waveguide. If the white finish itself doesn't bother the new owner like it would me....This tweeter took a hit. Hard to know if it impacted the component and wave guide alignment. The particle board frame appears OK and not penetrated. But the white finish is broken in lots of places and trashed.
It's actually amazing they still play music.
View attachment 391216
I think $75 is undercutting it a bit. They work fine, it's just a few chips. They sell used here for around $650 so while I agree paying $300 was generous, there's always someone who will ignore some cosmetic issues to get a great speaker they couldn't afford otherwise.
Me when I was younger and poorer for example.
I did take the advice to heart, was about to return it. Some people are saying check it out for audio damage and sounds, which I found nothing of. Tested it probably for 10 hours, did the tone test recommended here. Figured it was worth a gamble for $300. I don't think I have seen these speakers for this low, especially if structurally sound.You had multiple people advising you to walk away from the deal. If you enjoy it, no one can take it away from you.
You won’t be able to sell it for $300 with that kind of damage. You need a microphone to run a 20-20 kHz sweep and see how it performs.
But since you have gone against the advice given here which was: "walk away," just ignore the testing and enjoy what you have and listen to the music you enjoy. Ignorance is truly bliss.
I am actually curious about refinishing them or I can just cover them up with some stickers lol...Just shameful doing that to those speakers. $5 of packing materials and a bit of care could have made those arrive in pristine condition, barring extreme negligence from the carrier.
Good to hear the actual drivers and internals seem to be ok, at least. Wonder what it would cost to get the cabinets refinished.
Again its only $300, if all is well then well worth the money (which I hope you can agree) or it will be a $300 paperweight (which is not the end of the world).
People tend to overestimate how much their thing is worth. You have to look at it at from the perspective of when would the audience here recommend that you buy it. You can get an open box JBL 308P mkII for under $300 with return window. Do you think you will find people saying that you should get a damaged/dropped Revel M-16 for $300 or those JBL 308 at the same price? Wharfdale 12.1 or KEF Q150? Is it worth spending an extra $100 for the Wharfdale?
No problem name twin. I appreciate the bluntness. Also to clarify I finalized the deal at $300 for the pair not each. So it came out to $150 each. Does this make it better?I am going to be both kind and honest, because it’s the internet and we are all hiding behind computer screens and keyboards…
+1 that it’s not the end of the world. Imagine if you use the speakers every day for a year. Would you have paid $1 a day for the enjoyment? Sure! Even better, you are paying less than a dollar a day.
But, even if it measures well, I would not pay $300 for it. Look at the HDI-1600. Great speakers. 50% off at times. When the Revel speakers get clearance sales, it’ll be $450 new.
Look at the other Revel models. Brand new F35 at $800/pair
You could have gotten the F35’s for just a little more than your M16 used at your original $700. You made a mistake but it’s a lesson learned.
I think $300/pair is too much. Since you had the budget for $700 when you first bought it, you probably could have gone for Revel F35 instead. If you really wanted to keep the damaged Revel M16's, you should have offered just $150/pair.I went on a crusade and wanted to build out my system quick.
Upgrading from infinity r162s and adding a rsl 10e sub.