• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Upmixing - where are we at? Have people compared upmixers?

For those unfamiliar with the AnthemLogic upmixers, the -Cinema option upmixes to all speakers available in the selected speaker profile, whereas the -Music option upmixes to all available speakers EXCEPT the center channel.
I do wonder if they are much different than what Denon includes calling them "Rock Arena and Jazz Club"?
I find it curious that they are both going to the trouble to design proprietary upmixing codecs?
Personally I've never found any use for those 2?
 
Has anybody else here with a newer Anthem AVR or AVM tried either of the AnthemLogic modes (-Music or -Cinema) when upmixing from 2-channel sources? I've skimmed through most of the pages in this thread, but haven't seen any comparison of these to the other up-mixers.

For those unfamiliar with the AnthemLogic upmixers, the -Cinema option upmixes to all speakers available in the selected speaker profile, whereas the -Music option upmixes to all available speakers EXCEPT the center channel. My AVM70 enables me to switch upmixing modes among the Dolby, DTX, and AnthemLogic upmixers (no Auro capability), so I've been able to quickly compare them. I've settled on the AnthemLogic-Cinema option as my personal preference for music listening my system in my room, but I'm curious to hear about others' experiences.
Hey thanks for this! I've been looking since a long time for some experience from the Anthem up-mixers, but it's very hard to find something on the internet about them. Could you tell us maybe a bit more about the sound signature from the Anthem up-mixers compared to the Dolby and DTS one's? That would be really great! And is it able to use the Anthem up-mixers also on a 3D speaker setup? I remember when I asked Anthem about them for the MRX720, they told me it's only applicable if you are using a speaker setup with only the base layer, like 5.1, 7.1 etc. Not usable on a setup like 5.1.2 for example.
 
Hey thanks for this! I've been looking since a long time for some experience from the Anthem up-mixers, but it's very hard to find something on the internet about them. Could you tell us maybe a bit more about the sound signature from the Anthem up-mixers compared to the Dolby and DTS one's? That would be really great! And is it able to use the Anthem up-mixers also on a 3D speaker setup? I remember when I asked Anthem about them for the MRX720, they told me it's only applicable if you are using a speaker setup with only the base layer, like 5.1, 7.1 etc. Not usable on a setup like 5.1.2 for example.
You're welcome. The upmixers on the current Anthem units are no longer confined to the bed speakers. They can and do employ the heights if those are enabled in the speaker profile currently in use. Mine is a 7.1.4 setup, so I speak from personal experience when I say this. From Sal's comment, my guess is that he has never personally experienced AnthemLogic. It is nothing at all as he surmises.

Here are a couple relevant paragraphs from my documentation:

AnthemLogic-Cinema allows you to experience full-impact home theater sound from 2-channel audio content. This mode creates an extensive, enveloping, and dynamic listening experience that makes any 2-channel movie sound more like a presentation in a state-of-the-art cinema. Anthem engineers developed this proprietary mode through extensive listening tests, avoiding the use of echo effects, which can negatively impact dialogue intelligibility.

AnthemLogic-Music is also a minimalist design up-converter that uses no echo or reverberation effects. This mode enhances the stereo listening experience without degrading the stereo soundstage. To ensure that the purity of the musical soundstage is retained while you are sitting in your “sweet spot” listening to your favorite stereo recordings, this mode disables the AVM’s center channel output.


Between the Dolby and DTX upmixers, the Dolby system produces a more natural sounding overall presentation in my system, but both are more artificial sounding to me than either of the AnthemLogic modes. I would describe AnthemLogic's "sound signature" as closest to being none at all, which is my goal when listening to music. I prefer the -Cinema option because it enables me to anchor stage-center performers without having to remain centered between my front L/R speakers and relying on a "phantom" center channel effect.
 

From Sal's comment, my guess is that he has never personally experienced AnthemLogic. It is nothing at all as he surmises.
You are correct, I've never heard the Anthem's proprietary codings, I was simply expressing a curiosity.
The problem with trying to make any comparisons is the sheer overwhelming number of configuration options each
system offers. Between Dolby, DTS, and Auro, there must be hundreds of final possible results depending on personal
preferences.
 
You are correct, I've never heard the Anthem's proprietary codings, I was simply expressing a curiosity.
The problem with trying to make any comparisons is the sheer overwhelming number of configuration options each
system offers. Between Dolby, DTS, and Auro, there must be hundreds of final possible results depending on personal
preferences.
It seemed likely to me that you hadn't experienced a system running AnthemLogic from your conjecture that it was possibly similar to Denon's "Rock Arena" and "Jazz Club" options, since those rely primarily on reverb/echo effects to alter the virtual acoustic space. AnthemLogic doesn't do that at all.
 
You are correct, I've never heard the Anthem's proprietary codings, I was simply expressing a curiosity.
The problem with trying to make any comparisons is the sheer overwhelming number of configuration options each
system offers. Between Dolby, DTS, and Auro, there must be hundreds of final possible results depending on personal
preferences.
There are no real configuration options for any of those upmixer formats save Auro which just adjusts the amount of reverb and its delay time. DSU allows mixing the center back into the mains (no amounts to adjust like PLII). I don't think Neural X has any direct options (you can disable speakers in setup if you don't want them used). It's nothing like the settings Logic 7 offered under older Lexicon or even PLIIx.
 
There are no real configuration options for any of those upmixer formats save Auro which just adjusts the amount of reverb and its delay time.
There so many minor tweaks outside the app that can be addressed for upmixing with Dolby or DTS like individual speaker levels, etc but for Auro2D or 3D config a few points.
I'm not saying that any are better or worse than Anthem or Logic7, it's just a very complicated stew of ingredients to address..
Personally I have a few basic config's I'll check out for a particular album, but the rabbit hole is so deep you may never emerge. LOL

auro1.png


auro2.png
 
That's slightly more than my 7012 offers, but I still doubt they'd have a major impact.
 
I find auromatic upmixers..especially 3d offers an excellent sound that I would have dreamed of as a teenager. People don't mention the dts neural mixer much either. I just played a "Farwell To Kings" mixed by Steven Wilson in that format. Simply stunning. Listening to music at that clarity with that amount of effects is just womderful.. No words really for what a good avr, a pair of kefs and svs subs can do these days. No complaints from thid old dude.
 
Last edited:
I find auromatic upmixers..especially 3d offers an excellent sound that I would have dreamed of as a teenager. People don't mention the dts neural mixer much either. I just played a "Farwell To Kings" mixed by Steven Wilson in that format. Simply stunning. Listening to music at that clarity with that amount of effects is just womderful.. No words really for what a good avr, a pair of kefs and svs subs can do these days. No complaints from thid old dude.
I was just talking about this this topic to someone. I remember Neural-X being mentioned a lot on the Internet and it is still my preferred upmixer. Dolby might be the most accurate, Neural-X is close but a bit more fun. From my brief testing with Auro 3D, it is similar to Neural-X but even more aggressive and that's just a bit too much. But that's for movies, I don't know what it's like for music.
 
I was just talking about this this topic to someone. I remember Neural-X being mentioned a lot on the Internet and it is still my preferred upmixer. Dolby might be the most accurate, Neural-X is close but a bit more fun. From my brief testing with Auro 3D, it is similar to Neural-X but even more aggressive and that's just a bit too much. But that's for movies, I don't know what it's like for music.
Auro-3D's upmixer mostly just copies the lower speakers into the higher speakers and adds a bit of reverb. There are settings for how much and how big.

Neural X uses some kind of lookup table based on frequency splicing to compare whether the sound is likely coming from above or below and tries to place it there. It's probably the most accurate for movies and the most aggressive, but it tends to put music too high, IMO.

DSU looks for ambient sounds rather than the main ones to put overhead and puts them in all overheads the same (arrayed) so you only get left/right specitivity.
 
Auro-3D's upmixer mostly just copies the lower speakers into the higher speakers and adds a bit of reverb. There are settings for how much and how big.

Neural X uses some kind of lookup table based on frequency splicing to compare whether the sound is likely coming from above or below and tries to place it there. It's probably the most accurate for movies and the most aggressive, but it tends to put music too high, IMO.

DSU looks for ambient sounds rather than the main ones to put overhead and puts them in all overheads the same (arrayed) so you only get left/right specitivity.
Interesting. That would explain why Neural X seems to work the best for movies.
 
Hey thanks for this! I've been looking since a long time for some experience from the Anthem up-mixers, but it's very hard to find something on the internet about them. Could you tell us maybe a bit more about the sound signature from the Anthem up-mixers compared to the Dolby and DTS one's? That would be really great! And is it able to use the Anthem up-mixers also on a 3D speaker setup? I remember when I asked Anthem about them for the MRX720, they told me it's only applicable if you are using a speaker setup with only the base layer, like 5.1, 7.1 etc. Not usable on a setup like 5.1.2 for example.
I upmix all 2-channel music using Anthem Music Logic on my AVM 70. It’s excellent, naturally extending the soundstage and adding more contour to the bass range, at least in my setup. I have a 9.2.2 system, and MusicLogic makes subtle but effective use of my wide channels, front heights, and surround channels to enhance the sense of space—the width, depth, AND height of the soundstage and the intangible sense of space in the music. It turns off the center favoring the front mains, which I prefer, as it helps to maintain the “weight” and size of the center image in my setup. No reverb is used, but it does seem to boost the bass in a very satisfying way. The effect is subtle snd I forget that it’s on until I turn it off, at which point the music collapses and feel flat; or, when I switch to Dolby Surround, when, depending on the music and my mood, it will either sound amazing or “too much” . Sometimes Dolby Surround is convincing and just fun to listen to, but I always revert back to Music Logic as my default mode. For reference, I’ve also tried Audo3d on a Monoprice HTP1 and I didn’t get what all the fuss was about. I used Lexicons Logic7 back in the day in a far less sophisticated setup and never fully realized its supposed potential. Anyway, I don’t think Anthem gets enough press for its upmixers, which seem aimed at enthusiasts who favor stereo and want to preserve the integrity of the stereo mastering but want to make use of their extra channels.
 
I don't hear any big wall of sound from Neural X. That would be Auromatic. I've simulated a similar effect with Logic 7 by arraying overheads with the lower speakers.
 
Compared to Dolby Surround, it certainly is.
If by that you mean Dolby Surround leaves most of the sounds at ear level, OK, but otherwise you've lost me. Neural X spaces sounds precisely in the vertical plane. It sounds very much like Atmos/X, not a vertical stretch here.

Of course, it could be something in your specific setup giving that impression as well (am out of phase connection somewhere would certainly do it). It's hard to say without hearing it.
 
DSU is very conservative. Neural X is very aggressive. With the latter, you get a much "bigger" sound with a lot of surround and especially height activity.
 
DSU is very conservative. Neural X is very aggressive. With the latter, you get a much "bigger" sound with a lot of surround and especially height activity.
My recent experiences of Neural-X, especially with DTS-HD in general and Nolan movies in particular are that it's a little aggressive but not insane.
 
I guess it's the word "wall" of sound that throws me. A movie called Death Machine in Auro-3D very much has a "wall" of sound in that the sounds start at ear level and extend to the ceiling like a wall whereas a typical Atmos movie has sounds here, there and everywhere. Neural X can extend with some sounds, but it usually places them somewhere low, medium or high, not necessarily extended from top to bottom, which is what I'd call a 'wall' of sound.
 
Back
Top Bottom