What’s an Orbit 11.Maybe try also the Orbit 11
Google brings up Apollo 11, which probably isn’t your intention.
What’s an Orbit 11.Maybe try also the Orbit 11
Palmer Orbit 11, there are big threads at asr about it.What’s an Orbit 11.
Google brings up Apollo 11, which probably isn’t your intention.
Good speaker. Very expensive. The pros compared to LS60 are it can play louder and there are much fewer things to go wrong. Cons are you need external amp.. Considerably bigger so harder to place. For the price of one pair of reference 3 you can buy 3 pair of ls60.Totally difference ballpark so just throwing this out for fun. But how do you think LS60/4329p would compare to KEF Reference 3 non-meta? I'm a bit hesitant to go that route since I'll need to budget for a good amp down the road, and might be overkill for the space I have. But it's truly an endgame speaker from what I've read.
Budget in a subwoofer, too. The KEF KC62 would be perfect.Totally difference ballpark so just throwing this out for fun. But how do you think LS60/4329p would compare to KEF Reference 3 non-meta? I'm a bit hesitant to go that route since I'll need to budget for a good amp down the road, and might be overkill for the space I have. But it's truly an endgame speaker from what I've read.
Nope. Unless you must have kc62 because of space. There are better options at same priceBudget in a subwoofer, too. The KEF KC62 would be perfect.
I’d stick with the LS60s. They’re quite special.
Part of the beauty of the LS60s is the total integration of the electronics.
Amp hunting to compliment loudspeakers is like going down a rabbit hole.
Personally, it drives me nuts, which is why I got them rather than getting new speakers.
Plus my electronics are all pretty old at this point …
Dual LINN LK280, NAIM NAT 112 preamp, NAIM CD 3.5, NAIM FlatCap 2 power supply for preamp and CD.
I have the CD 3.5 and FlatCap 2 connected to the LS60s. Win-Win!
Maybe. But they’re also not designed to work seamlessly with the LS60s.Nope. Unless you must have kc62 because of space. There are better options at same price
Maybe. But they’re also not designed to work seamlessly with the LS60s.
There’s a lot to be said for a simple, fast, pain-free setup.
No buzzing. I have two KC62s connected to my LS60s.I'll assume you have no buzzing from your KC62? There seems to be a lot of internet chatter around that particular sub making some not so great noises. I don't believe all that much of what I read on the internet and I'm not currently in the market, but since you have some love for it and own one I'm curious if you have followed any of these buzzing conversations or had any issues yourself?
seamlessly is one thing, bass output is usually the deciding factor. Integrating subs into a sound system, while not trivial, is not difficult either, so you don't have to pay more for less performance, just for the convenienceMaybe. But they’re also not designed to work seamlessly with the LS60s.
There’s a lot to be said for a simple, fast, pain-free setup.
Performance isn’t an issue with the KC62s at all.seamlessly is one thing, bass output is usually the deciding factor. Integrating subs into a sound system, while not trivial, is not difficult either, so you don't have to pay more for less performance, just for the convenience
Both are good speakers. I suggest you read these reviews (or watch the associated videos):I'm trying to make the exact same decision as OP in this thread - 4329p vs LS60 for my ~15x15x15ft living room. I already have a RSL 10s subwoofer with LS50w in that space, so I can reuse the sub if needed but not sure if I will need to? Also not sure how I feel about the fixed 80Hz crossover of the JBL. I listen to mostly electronic music (house/techno/trance) and some easy listening vocal music at moderate volume (80db) so trying to prioritize bass response mostly. Also I'll need a stand for the 4329p, I don't like the look and price of the JBL stand, but not sure how the performance will be on another or DIY stand without the tilt.
I was able to find only one video directly comparing them, it's not at all scientific and is also in Vietnamese, but it gives you an idea how they appear relative to each other. The LS60 does look more elegant and has higher WAF.
Here are a couple of LS60 reviews from Stereophile magazine.Both are good speakers. I suggest you read these reviews (or watch the associated videos):
KEF LS60 Wireless Powered Speaker Review
KEF LS60 Wireless Powered Speaker Reviewwww.erinsaudiocorner.com
In a 15' x 15' x 15' room either will be fine. I have my LS60 speakers in a 13.8' x 11.8' x 12.2' room, and they will play signifcantly louder than I ever would want to listen, even without a subwoofer. I had no intention of getting a subwoofer for mine, but I inherited a SVS SB-1000 Pro and figured I would give it a shot. It adds a little below 30Hz, but I would not go out and buy one for the LS60s unless I had them in a much bigger room.
I think dual KC92 is more like it , but get a good price ( I did ) . Well LS60 has preset for kefs own subs , but they are not as useful as one might think it works but for best results you still need to bring out a microphone and do some PEQ integration and measure the results with different settings on the sub xover in the LS60 .Maybe. But they’re also not designed to work seamlessly with the LS60s.
There’s a lot to be said for a simple, fast, pain-free setup.
The Reference 3s look amazing, but the level and quality of power you’d want to drive them could be eye watering.Thanks everyone for your opinions, very helpful. I have an opportunity to get a pair of used KEF Reference 3 non-meta for about the same price as a pair of brand new LS60, hence my questions. The 4329p is ~25% cheaper but need to factor in the stand cost as well. I don't think I can listen loud enough for any of these speaker to edge out the other - my LS50w already get very loud with a sub. Currently leaning towards the Reference 3 since it's such a good deal and endgame speakers, but I know I'll be digging myself into an equipment rabbit hole if I get it, and I've been eyeing the LS60 ever since they were released as well. Decisions...
My apartment is too small and I can’t afford two KC92s.I think dual KC92 is more like it , but get a good price ( I did ) . Well LS60 has preset for kefs own subs , but they are not as useful as one might think it works but for best results you still need to bring out a microphone and do some PEQ integration and measure the results with different settings on the sub xover in the LS60 .
I had one KC62 for about a year. It was great. I made the mistake of reading about dual subs and caught the upgrade bug.I wonder if one KC62 simply is to small ?
Agreed. KEF could have made more adjustments possible.There are limitations in the LS60 sub integration there are no latency settings ( delaye time ) and it’s simply unknown if they factored their own subs latency into this , but this is also placement dependent so they really can’t do that either.
Even I’ve reached good results. I think Kef should improve the advanced settings in the LS60 and offer PEQ and room correction ( they undersell thier product as a lifestyle item it is mini high end system )
A purifi based amp at 1/10 price of the speaker would be more than enough.The Reference 3s look amazing, but the level and quality of power you’d want to drive them could be eye watering.