• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Upgrade of the day: Shorter cables

Status
Not open for further replies.

olds1959special

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Apr 5, 2024
Messages
504
Likes
158
Location
Los Angeles, CA
I was thrilled to realize I could use 3 foot instead of 6 foot RCA cables from pre-amp to amp. I just had to move things a little bit, and there's not much slack, but it's worth it for the sound. I heard a difference!
 
Please let us know who helped you with the Blind Tests...

Ohms
 
I was thrilled to realize I could use 3 foot instead of 6 foot RCA cables from pre-amp to amp. I just had to move things a little bit, and there's not much slack, but it's worth it for the sound. I heard a difference!

Of course you heard a difference, the signal has 36” less distance to travel so only a complete idiot would think otherwise
 
I hate long RCA cables.
 
This some sort of weird sense of humor or you have some issues with how things actually work?
 
Slack is good.
I would prefer to have a little more slack on one side but there is enough as long as things don't get yanked.
 
Of course you heard a difference, the signal has 36” less distance to travel so only a complete idiot would think otherwise
Lesser capacitance of the shorter cable may have resulted in a bit less HF rolloff if the source impedance feeding it were sufficiently high.
 
not-sure-if-trolling.jpg
 
Thesis would not survive a blind test. As usual.
 
Better timing, faster attack etc? :P
 
That's why integrated amplifiers are always better than separates and the old radiograms are the best :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom