• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Unneccesary analog to digital to analog?

Neelz

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2025
Messages
2
Likes
5
I have connected my Linn Sondek LP12 turntable via the Lindemann Limetree Phono to my KEF LS50 Wireless II speakers (aux input).

It feels unnecessary that the analog signal is converted to digital by the speakers’ internal DAC and then back to analog again. That can’t be beneficial for the sound, can it? I’m not an audio expert, so I’m curious to hear the experiences and opinions of the experts on this forum.
 
That can’t be beneficial for the sound, can it?
It can! The LS50 uses DSP to optimize and filter the speaker, so the net is a positive impact on sound quality. Given that your source is a turn table, I wouldn’t worry either way, because that will be the bottleneck.
 
I have connected my Linn Sondek LP12 turntable via the Lindemann Limetree Phono to my KEF LS50 Wireless II speakers (aux input).

It feels unnecessary that the analog signal is converted to digital by the speakers’ internal DAC and then back to analog again. That can’t be beneficial for the sound, can it? I’m not an audio expert, so I’m curious to hear the experiences and opinions of the experts on this forum.

If it helps you sleep at night, try to think of it is a crossover, which is mostly what it is. The loss in sound quality from the AD/DA + DSP processing is typically not any worse than the loss of a traditional analog crossover filter.

If you look at a traditional analog crossover, and see what the sound has to go through there (teeny tiny wires of the crossover components, coils), that doesn't look great either. :)
 
In the pure analog domain, to achieve the level of what yours KEFs DSP does, you have to invest x5 more money and lot of time/knowledge. And even then success is not certain.
Also, the analog signal will have to go through a lot more circuitry with passive or active components. Think about that when you're worried about ADA conversion :)
 


You can try these samples for yourself. Original digital files go thru 8 generations of DAC to ADC conversions. The files are there to download and you can see if you can hear which are the original files and which are 8th generation copies. Once you do I think you will no longer worry about one such extra conversion. The gear used was not exotic nor incredibly expensive.
 
The owner of Linn was himself unable to spot when an A to D, D to A loop was added to the signal from his turntable. And that was thirty years ago when A to D wasn't as good as it is now.

So you've nothing to worry about, no way in the world will there be any audible degradation in the sound and it lets you EQ the signal from your turntable.

With a good deck like the one you have the limitation in sound quality is the vinyl records themselves. Properly engineered record decks got better than the format certainly by the end of the 1970s (Technics SP10) and arguably before that.
 
It feels unnecessary that the analog signal is converted to digital by the speakers’ internal DAC and then back to analog again.
As others have said, the only way your speakers perform as they do is because the signals to each driver are filtered precisely using DSP.

You may also be surprised to know that most vinyl from late 70s on was pressed using a digital conversion to improve dynamic range. All the details are in this video:

 
Wow, tnx for all the responses everybody . Super interesting.
I didn’t consider that the ‘traditional’ analog to analog crossover has its own challenges.
I can definitely sleep better now :).
 
yes making the crossover basically software is a very good idea :) then there is one DAC+amp per driver
 


You can try these samples for yourself. Original digital files go thru 8 generations of DAC to ADC conversions. The files are there to download and you can see if you can hear which are the original files and which are 8th generation copies. Once you do I think you will no longer worry about one such extra conversion. The gear used was not exotic nor incredibly expensive.
What's the DAC/ADC in the 2016 version? :)
 
What's the DAC/ADC in the 2016 version? :)
DAC was a Tact RCS 2.0 which had room correction. I was using as a straight thru DAC. It was from 2002 or so.

The ADC was a Focusrite Forte which was something like $450 at the time as a two channel recording interface.


 
Keeping the signal chain as short as possible is indeed on of the basic principles of high fidelity audio reproduction. Though, as has already been mentioned, a DSP does offer many advantages in getting a speaker to play as optimally as possible in your room.
 
My LP12 is connected to my Lyngdorf TDAI 3400. So the signal from the LP12 is also converted to digital in the amplifier. The Linn Urika II phone stage is converting the signal to digital also :)
 
My LP12/Ekos/AT33PTGII feeds a Cambridge Audio Duo connected to a Classé Sigma SSP mk2 which digitizes it to 96/24 for room correction. Sounds just great.
 
Back
Top Bottom