I glanced at the paper. Was surprised that it provided no value over NFS. The 2000 point scan took 7 hours yet deviated by as much as 30% at 1 kHz.
Also strange is that they did not take advantage of gating for high frequencies, resulting in this observation:
"In detail, the error remains below 15% for frequencies below 1 kHz but quickly rise to 30% around1 kHz, and towards 100% when the validity frequency range is outreached, and the frequency reaches 5 kHz."
I was really hoping they would bring an advantage of much less scan time, more accuracy or both. None seems to be at play. Maybe it is a way to not infringe on any patents Klippel may have.