• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Tweeter's inverted phase.

explanation
Can you explain this:
1759517361389.png

?..
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAB
The explanation for the reverberation changes is that sound absorption has appeared on the rear wall. There are unpleasant resonances at low frequencies in the room. This treatment had no effect on the perception of the problem I described. The tweeter was also inverted a month later.

I tried to compensate for the dip using a real parametric equalizer. I can clearly hear the effect of the equalization, but it doesn't change the overall character of the sound at all.
 
Dear friends, I have stated my reasons quite clearly, and I still stand by my position. I do not intend to disclose the name of the loudspeaker until an explanation is found.
I can assure you that my loudspeaker is not fundamentally different from the vast majority of similar designs. It is a floorstanding speaker, 110 cm tall and 22 cm wide. I hope this information helps to explain my problem. Thank you.
It does help explain your problem.
You think ASR is a free technical advice forum at your full disposal, compounded by you pretending to have an issue that requires you to withhold information on what the issue is. The real paradox (if I may use that word correctly) is this info is what your 'friends' here need to actually lend assistance. And for sure you seem in need.
 
Dear friends,

This is addressed to those asking me to disclose the brand and model of the loudspeaker. I have already explained that the loudspeaker’s design and its reaction to my intervention are not fundamentally different from many similar designs. In other words, a knowledgeable and experienced person can provide an explanation even based on the amount of information I have shared.

As for my position, you don’t need a “hyper-brain” to understand one simple thing: if something negative—or even merely doubtful—about any product appears in the public domain, it can harm the manufacturer’s reputation. Moreover, it can reduce the product’s value on the secondary market. Please excuse my frankness.

Several good thoughts have already been voiced here. I'm grateful for your help and hope to find an answer.
 
if something negative—or even merely doubtful—about any product appears in the public domain, it can harm the manufacturer’s reputation.
If a manufacturer's reputation can be so seriously damaged by a single thread on ASR then it isn't cut out for long-term survival anyway
 
  • Like
Reactions: MAB
Not so. Without this post, the manufacturer could have prospered and grown its profits for many centuries.
But now that it has suddenly become known that after the tweeter inversion soundstage depth appeared, a lot of “dirt” disappeared, and real metallic tone began to come through in cymbals, about 76-88% of the owners of this famous speaker from all over the world will send them back to the factory to have the tweeter reversed at the factory's expense, this will cause losses, ruin, bankruptcy and collapse and so on.
 
Back
Top Bottom