• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero IEM Review

Rate this IEM

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 13 2.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 21 3.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 73 12.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 493 82.2%

  • Total voters
    600

GaryH

Major Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2021
Messages
1,348
Likes
1,804
I will likely do the same, knowing what I currently have for IEMs and how they compare to my dual sub system, both of which have greater output down there.

Depending how it sounds, it looks like eyeballing the graph would give:

+6 dB at 20 Hz
+3 dB at 30 Hz
+2 dB at 40 Hz
+1 dB at 50 Hz

-1 dB from 1 to 3 kHz

May give a better match to the target.

However @Maiky76 designed his EQ based on Amir's measurement, which is different. People should try both and see which one they think is better.
Yeah as I surmised in my earlier post I suspect the deviation from the Harman target might actually be more accurate with Crinacle's measurements. Looks like the Truthear ranges from 5-6 dB below Harman at 20 Hz, dependent on the unit you get:
graph-14.png

And the 1-3 kHz region reaches a maximum of ~1.5 dB above target on some units. Of course averaging all 10 sample measurements and EQing using that would be most likely to get any one random unit closest to the target.
 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
IEM insertion depth has measurable effects on...frequency response.
Is that measured on a rigid and unchanging electro-mechanical device, or by some fantastic new method of measuring how the typical brain responds to stimuli? Which may vary from one individual to another?

To be clear, I am not disputing the usefulness or accuracy of these kinds of measurements. I'm suggesting that however useful these measurements are they do not *rigidly* define how they are actually experienced by actual humans using the same measured products. They are very useful, very interesting, make for easy comparison of certain aspects, and yet are not measuring hearing but something else which is in fact a mechanistic interpretation of a neurological and bio-mechanical experience.
 

sweetchaos

Major Contributor
The Curator
Joined
Nov 29, 2019
Messages
3,872
Likes
11,554
Location
BC, Canada
Arrived today.

Only listened to a few songs, but initial impression is excellent. :D

My reference is Genelec 8040’s and Sennheiser HD560s with Amir’s PEQ.
Felt on par with Gennys in terms of overall balance.

I love that I don't need to use EQ out of the box.

I'll be giving these as Christmas gifts to everyone I know.

I can see benching my HD560s for the summer, and using these primarily then.

This is easily my 2nd favorite headphone, after HD560s, regardless of piece. #1 favourite for US$50.

Would never have considered IEMs if it wasn't for Amir’s review.
 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
A
IEM insertion depth has measurable effects on...frequency response.
And another thing (sorry, am on the ale): If insertion depth is genuinely significant then all the measurements which ignore it become less valid. It means we cannot compare an Etymotic with a Moondrop with a Shure. All comparisons of IEMs with different insertion depths are misleading.
 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
And another another thing (sorry, but it's late): With the upper bass bleed tamed the Moondrop Katos are much more enjoyable than these Truthears in another way: with the Truthears I experience that thing of three distinct points: "sound on the left, sound on the right, sound in the middle". With the Katos I hear a cohesive environment. No, not quite like loudspeakers but very close. Crossfeed not a temptation.
 

pauze

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
25
Likes
24
Received my ZEROs yesterday. I settled on the small aperture tips (perceived more bass impact and better imaging) and have been running comparisons against my other headphones (Drop/Sennheiser 6XX, Beyer DT880 600 Ohms > run off a Topping NX4) and my home studio setup (MOTU Ultralite mk5 into KRK V8S2 monitors in a treated room) ever since receipt and I am coming away seriously impressed. In particular, they put the 6XX to shame (though tbh never could really get on with that set). While they don't have as nice of a stereo image as my studio monitors, the tonality is better in comparison since the sound doesn't have a room to fight with. Definitely adding them to my mixing arsenal/workflow. I can't believe these are so cheap, though I can see needing a new cable at some point if this gets heavy use (and I expect it to).
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,545
Location
Seattle Area
A

And another thing (sorry, am on the ale): If insertion depth is genuinely significant then all the measurements which ignore it become less valid. It means we cannot compare an Etymotic with a Moondrop with a Shure. All comparisons of IEMs with different insertion depths are misleading.
Not if you start to gradually ignore the response errors above 6 kHz as I do.
 

Chromatischism

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
4,767
Likes
3,706
Can you expand on that and clarify?
This might help.

 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
This might help.

Not really, as I don't see how test results published here acknowledge or reflect that.

Also, why should the points I raised be corralled into a narrow discussion about the response between 7.5 & 8.5 kHz?
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,545
Location
Seattle Area
Can you expand on that and clarify?
There are too many vagaries from mounting the driver to differences in measurement rig. I don't believe in averaging to dial these out as that then doesn't represent any unit. You can see this in my measurements of left and right units even though the measurement rig is the same:

index.php


There is excellent tracking to 3 kHz but above that deviations start.

Also, the target is highly smoothed as otherwise it too would have those ups and downs. So comparisons against it are not totally valid either.

As such, I EQ to ear instead of relying on measurements alone. If the EQ in that region sounds better, then it is a good bet.
 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
edit: the following was a reply to Chromaticism, not Amir or anyone else.

Maybe answer a reasonable question with a reasonable answer instead of deflecting it off into a somewhat but not entirely related issue. If that constitutes an answer then there's not much point in asking.
 
Last edited:

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
There are too many vagaries from mounting the driver to differences in measurement rig. I don't believe in averaging to dial these out as that then doesn't represent any unit. You can see this in my measurements of left and right units even though the measurement rig is the same:

index.php


There is excellent tracking to 3 kHz but above that deviations start.

Also, the target is highly smoothed as otherwise it too would have those ups and downs. So comparisons against it are not totally valid either.

As such, I EQ to ear instead of relying on measurements alone. If the EQ in that region sounds better, then it is a good bet.
So would 3k be the limit of what different measurement rigs can reliably distinguish? After 3k what are we really seeing in measurements? Tendencies?
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,376
Likes
234,545
Location
Seattle Area
So would 3k be the limit of what different measurement rigs can reliably distinguish? After 3k what are we really seeing in measurements? Tendencies?
There is no hard limit. In your mind, gradually distrust the measurements from then on and focus on larger picture. Certainly above 10 kHz it is a crapshoot.
 

SuicideSquid

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 20, 2022
Messages
699
Likes
1,647
Mine arrived and I'm listening to them now. Few thoughts:

1. Wow, these really do sound fantastic, with smooth and balanced frequency response and loads of bass. They absolutely demolish my Altec Lansing and Ultimate Ears IEMs, both of which are getting a bit long in the tooth and both of which cost at least 3x was these did.

2. The packaging is (aside from the cringey waifu) really impressive for a product in this price class. Lots of options for tips, a very nice carrying bag, detachable cable, and good quality packing overall.

Definitely very impressed.
 

julian_hughes

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
657
Likes
901
There is no hard limit. In your mind, gradually distrust the measurements from then on and focus on larger picture. Certainly above 10 kHz it is a crapshoot.
My experience of FR measurements of stuff I actually own and use is that they very accurately describe bass response, and if it is overcooked and ruins the mids. And then there are the frequencies of the human voice. And that's what we notice, what we actually pay attention to and *hear*. The rest, unless truly awful, matters a lot less. I have EQ apps on my desktops and laptop and phone and smartphone which can import and apply AutoEQ profiles. But in the end I go back to just correcting the grossest errors (which is usually bass bleeding into mids) and not worry about minor stuff. The unusual thing about the Truthears is that the bass doesn't need correction, but the frequency range of the human voice does. They are decent enough and worth the price, and I like a lot how they engineered the crossover to be like a very well implemented low shelf filter, but I'm not convinced by them because that human voice range is not so well executed as the bass, and it matters at least as much.
 

Robbo99999

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
6,878
Likes
6,674
Location
UK
Even if they are eq'd to supposedly sound the same? I'm not a measuring apparatus. Maybe regardless of FR it really matters a lot how far the things are stuck down your lugholes? Hearing is an amazing thing. Someone right beside you can be practically yelling and you might not even notice. Or a twig might snap 20 metres away and you are instantly alert. I can't sleep well in a noisy place. I have a friend who can't sleep well outside of a busy city as he needs the noise. The hair cells in our cochlea don't always respond the exact same way to the same stimulus. We are not mechanical but bio-mechanical and our brains, where hearing actually happens, which control those hair cells, are not an open book. Everyone who is certain that they understand hearing is mistaken. This focus on FR measured, necessarily, on electro-mechanical devices is really useful for identifying differences or certain characteristics but using it as "one graph to rule them all" is a very narrow focus.
Ah, you EQ'd them to the same curve did you? My comment was more related to the fact that the measured frequency responses of the IEM's are different, which would explain particularly some of the points you mentioned in that post of yours I quoted earlier. (But for this post now, I don't really understand the relevance of your examples about twigs / shouting / sleeping / hair cells in your ear.)
 
Top Bottom