In your opinion/experience of the Harman Curve, which is only your own experience and certainly not predictive of the majority.Tracking the contour of the Harman bass curve gets you much closer to reality than the stock tuning of the Zero. It will sound much cleaner and be more impactful than the rounded curve you see stock. But, if you do that, the level will be too high, so you end up with a very boom-tiss sounding, V-shaped IEM. So follow the curve, but bring the level down a bit so you still get your mids.
There's no real reason why people would prefer your own personally tuned curve. I know we've had this discussion before, and I know the arguments you bring up for it, but it should be made aware to the forum dwellers and visitor readers that there is not magic in people's own personally tuned preferred target curves/EQ's, which is the only reason I'm quickly bringing this up again, seeing as you're advertising your own EQ again. So this isn't an invitation to re-open the discussion, (seeing as we've discussed it in depth already) but instead more of a public service broadcast, lol!Funny you ask - I am going to update it tonight.
In the last one, I tried to assuade the naysayers by adding more highs. I also wanted to hear it for myself. After a while I noticed my listening enjoyment went down. I also discovered some vocal sibilance in other songs I didn't use last time. Using the manual EQ on top of the graphic EQ, I found the problem area: the 5 kHz + range. More to come.
Last edited: