- Joined
- Jan 11, 2026
- Messages
- 354
- Likes
- 176
TLDR: relative to the included narrow hole tips, the wide hole tips have more bass (< 350) and more treble (> 3k), and the foam ones have more bass but less treble. The differences are slight, and the narrow hole ones (used in Amir's measurements) seam to be roughly more harman compliant.
For anyone else curious, here is a comparison of the frequency response I found of the various included tips (credit to @Loomynarty ?):
I also found a similar graph from "therollo9" (is this @therollo9 ?)
(the blue line doesn't say what tips where used, but I assume they are the narrow ones)
Both graphs claim to be measured on a clone IEC60318-4 compliant ear simulator (which is probably why they look different to Amir's GRAS 45C measurements)
(If you click my links, and scroll down to the button right area, you should see download buttons to get the raw measurement data if you want to import into another software to do a more fine grained comparison, but I couldn't be bothered.)
For anyone else curious, here is a comparison of the frequency response I found of the various included tips (credit to @Loomynarty ?):
I also found a similar graph from "therollo9" (is this @therollo9 ?)
(the blue line doesn't say what tips where used, but I assume they are the narrow ones)
Both graphs claim to be measured on a clone IEC60318-4 compliant ear simulator (which is probably why they look different to Amir's GRAS 45C measurements)
(If you click my links, and scroll down to the button right area, you should see download buttons to get the raw measurement data if you want to import into another software to do a more fine grained comparison, but I couldn't be bothered.)