• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Trinnov AltitudeCI (aka Altitude CI) Initial Review

etc6849

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
203
Likes
369
Location
Columbia, SC
Background:
I did some quick digital-path testing on my AltitudeCI because I wanted to check the part of the unit that I use in playback: HDMI input to AES output. I am not using the AltitudeCI analog outputs, so I was not trying to test the DAC section or analog performance. I also don't feel like trying to sweep them as there's not a lot of space behind my front rack...

The test was inspired by the earlier Altitude32 ASR review, but this is not a direct duplicate of that test setup as I ran into REW limitations and didn't want to spend a lot of time, once I saw the outstanding results I was getting with room correction and a "Strong" target curve enabled, versus without.

The good news for the few tests I did, I do not see any obvious clipping, side bands, or strange HDMI behavior visible at the AES outputs that is of relevance.

Signal Path for Test:
JRiver Media Center playing playing wave test files → NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti HDMI output → Trinnov AltitudeCI HDMI input → AltitudeCI AES output → RME HDSPe AES input → REW RTA capture

The RME HDSPe AES is best accessed through ASIO, while the Trinnov HDMI output from the PC is exposed through the normal Windows/Java device path in REW. REW’s driver mode is global, so I could not simply select Java for HDMI output and ASIO for RME input in the same REW instance. The workaround was to generate 96 k/24-bit -3dBFS WAV test files, play them in JRiver through my normal Trinnov HDMI zone, and capture the AltitudeCI AES output with the RME/REW analyzer path.

I used -3 dBFS test files for the main flat/no-correction checks. Captured levels matched the file levels, so the HDMI-to-AES path appeared to be at unity (for the flat measurements with room optimization turned off anyways).

I would not interpret the small far-out spurs as audible or practically significant.They are on the order of -175 to -180 dBFS, and the 2M FFT setting is intentionally revealing. A lower FFT length would likely hide them. They also appeared at 19kHz even if I perform a loop back test on the RME sound card by itself in REW, with the Trinnov totally removed from the signal chain. Unfortunately, I can't measure any better to remove them, as I have already turned on dithering which helped get rid of some... However, this is plenty good enough for me, and I can't swing Audio Precision gear plus have the Trinnov AltitudeCI :)

Bottom line:
In my setup, the AltitudeCI HDMI-in to AES-out path looks extremely clean at 96 kHz, even with my usual strong target curve listening preset plus optimization enabled... The very low spurs I have are reproducible, but are from my RME HDSPe AES card (as I did loopback measurements to prove this). I'm really happy to finally find a processor that does what I want, and to have decent HDMI that doesn't degrade audio quality (my last processor was in 2016).

The CI is highly recommended, but is not cheap at all. However, I figured, heck the room has 16 Benchmark AHB2 amps, so why not add a Trinnov processor too. There are actually very few options that could provide 32 AES input and output channels btw, with no down-sampling either (only tested up to 192kHz, and can't test beyond that). Of course, most movies are still mastered in 48kHz, but it's great to have an Atmos/DTS-X decoder that can work with my pro-audio based setup so well!

I will say that before when I tried room correction software, I quickly removed it as I found it to add slight artifacts. Not the case with the Trinnov, all I hear is improvement. It is one of the first processors I've had that didn't try to set my subs to some ridiculous value like 30 feet either.

In fact, the CI left most of my custom settings I had previously put into each Xilica XD4080, using an Earthworks M30 mic, Benchmark ADC1 and MPA1. And the 3d microphone is highly sensitive. Even if you rotate it as small as humanly possible, the slight rotation still shows up on the polar plot inside the CI's GUI that can map your speaker locations three dimensionally. It's that sensitive, and if anything, all the level and time delay it did improved from what I had meticulously done by hand.

The AtitudeCI I'm using is actually only 10 channels for now, and eventually if I can ever afford the channel upgrades necessary, I'd like to drive the remaining two height speakers, tri-amp the main bed and hook the subs individually to the Trinnov AltitudeCI. Right now, I'm still using 6 Xilica XD4080 Speaker Processors (4in, 8out) that are fed AES3. They act as the DSP for crossing to the 8 subs, tri-amping the 5 bed channels with FIR filters, all time alignment, all level alignment, etc...

Hopefully I can one-day remove the excellent Xilica XD4080's and add more Benchmark DAC3 B's connected directly to the Trinnov Altitude CI. This would actually be a lot better for headroom management, plus the DAC3 B analog outputs provide a few additional dB of headroom over the XD4080 analog outputs. I've been slowly adding the DAC3 B's as I find them used, since the Xilica XD4080's have digital inputs and outputs as well.

Flat results with no correction:
-180dBFS WAV File Test (Flat target curve, no optimization turned on):

1782066517147.png


-3dBFS WAV File Tests (Flat target curve, no optimization turned on):
1782066350883.png

1782066242902.png

1782066407315.png

1782066834154.png


Strong Target Curve Plus Room Optimization:
1782065631818.png

1782065411609.png

1782065470782.png


1782065519801.png

1782065572287.png


Notes for these tests with the "Strong" target curve and room optimization turned on: I had to set the Altitude's volume down -8dB just to prevent any clipping due to the room optimization adding a few dBs, plus the fact that the target curve is a little aggressive:
Trinnov Settings for Second Round of Tests.png


That's why I labeled these measurements as -11dBFS, while they are the same -3dBFS WAV files as before...

Some pics of the setup:
Trinnov Installed.jpg

Front.jpg

Rear.jpg

Rear2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Thanks! I didn't put this in the OP, but I even handmade 100+ cables to connect everything. I used Canare star-quad cables for the XLR, AES and even the trigger wires.


Here's an older picture of one of the racks before the Trinnov and the custom water-cooled PC:
1781998074624.jpeg


1781997878096.png

".... has 16 Benchmark AHB2 amps"!! Just really amazing... :D
Incase if you would be interested, you are cordially invited joining participating on my hosting thread entitled "Let's share diagrams (and photos) of our total physical audio system and the whole signal path, with a few words and/or links".
 
Wow, not only your hardware setting/configuration but also the most careful and skillful wiring tidying-up efforts are also just amazing!
At least I myself really like seeing such a backside wiring photo/view...

It looks you are using very quiet Noctua fans in your DIY/custom water-cooled PC, right?
 
Definitely. I did each rack that way. I'm sure there are professional integrators who do that level of work too, but I probably couldn't afford to pay them plus have all that gear in there! Three of the subs I bought broken and repaired too, and most gear in that room is used with a few exceptions.

Wow, not only your hardware setting/configuration but also the most careful and skillful wiring tidying-up efforts are also just amazing!
At least I myself really like seeing such a backside wiring photo/view...
 
With minimal/optimal length cables; just beautiful and really nice!
 
IMHO those tiny (< -160dB) peaks could easily be artefacts of the HDMI/AES 24-bit path or REW float32 processing of otherwise bitperfect chain (digital -> digital). I would recommend to ask REW author @JohnPM .
 
Last edited:
Looks to me like the WAV file and generator output were not dithered, should turn on 24-bit dither.
 
HDPSe AES loop back looks even better now. Thanks John! EDIT: oops, turns out even with 24 bit dither on, there are still small spurs, especially on the 19kHz test...

1782063976498.png

1782067865381.png

1782067876380.png



Looks to me like the WAV file and generator output were not dithered, should turn on 24-bit dither.
 
Last edited:
Eventually I want to try it, but I have 8 subs and only 10 channels unlocked on the CI, plus Trinnov raised the price of the licenses a week ago, which also sucks.

Are you using, or planning to use Waveforming?
 
If you are ever in the US, stop by for a listen. The Trinnov AltitudeCI really brought my system up that last few percent, and is some fantastic engineering.
You room is, in a good way, absolutely bonkers.

Yep. You can just faintly hear the PC when the graphics card is at full power. I still use the Nvidia 2080 Ti for MadVR, and it does an outstanding job. If I ever get into gaming, I have plenty of thermal headroom and will probably upgrade the card, but space is a little tight!
It looks you are using very quiet Noctua fans in your DIY/custom water-cooled PC, right?
IMG_20190326_163832.jpg

IMG_20190326_163856.jpg

IMG_20190326_194926.jpg

IMG_20190326_195541.jpg
 
Around ~10% increase across the board. However, now they include tariffs into the price, so it wasn't really a 10% increase for physical products... The CI is still one of the cheaper options if you need more than 16 channels (or might in the future like me) and want the absolute best performance. I prefer having digital outputs too; it integrated perfectly into my existing pro-audio setup, and the freedom to add the additional 20 channels as I have the funds is neat too.

How much was before and how much is it today?
 
Back
Top Bottom