I would like to make one last point, and a scenario.
I know this is out there, but imagine if you will…
Imagine the AV industry putting a bunch of R&D and implementation of that R&D downstream in our processors, instead of correcting what comes out the other side.
I think I have the answer as to why they don’t do it, because it’s too expensive, and they can keep pulling their room correction pistol out. Because they’re so far ahead in DSP that they don’t have to, and they keep us happy with software updates, or do they because I was happy before the update… kind of. But they can get by making a bunch of mediocre measuring machines because they think they can correct it coming out the other side.
Now here’s where it gets crazy, and bear with me please.
Imagine this scenario… Imagine that they transformed the AVR and the AVP starting down stream and followed through to the end. Imagine an industry where they actually cared about measurements, instead of correcting mediocracy. When our host said that the AV industry abandoned us along time ago I believe this is what he’s talking about. Why put a bunch of expensive parts into a machine when you don’t have to, because you can correct it anyway. Nobody will be any wiser, that is to ASR pulled out their AP analyzer. It’s a lot easier to download a bunch of software into a processor then it is to start over and build one that’s really worthy of our money. Before ASR started to do this, did you see anybody in the industry, any of the insiders, call the AV manufacturer’s out on this? I’ll wait…
Back to your regularly scheduled program in 3…2…1…