• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Transparent DSD DAC/chip

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
3,016
Likes
3,966
I'm not an expert but since there is no fixed-calibration between the DSD level and the output voltage it should be possible to for the DAC to adjust the volume as part of the digital-analog-conversion. Or, simply adjusting the level of the analog output should work just as well. (Either of those could be digitally controlled.)
 

Music1969

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
4,669
Likes
2,845
that's why it's sometimes advisable to convert it to Hi-freq PCM if some changes
Done properly, many programs actually maintain the original sample rate, for DSP to be applied.

So 1-bit 11MhHz (DSD256) becomes 64-bit 11MHz, DSP applied, then modulated back down to 1-bit 11MHz for D to A

Roon , JRiver, HQPlayer all treat DSD DSP this way.

Even ESS and AKM when not in DSDD mode, although probably 32-bit and final output is 5-bit 11MHz, not 1-bit
 

pkane

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
5,670
Likes
10,301
Location
North-East
Done properly, many programs actually maintain the original sample rate, for DSP to be applied.

So 1-bit 11MhHz (DSD256) becomes 64-bit 11MHz, DSP applied, then modulated back down to 1-bit 11MHz for D to A

Roon , JRiver, HQPlayer all treat DSD DSP this way.

Even ESS and AKM when not in DSDD mode, although probably 32-bit and final output is 5-bit 11MHz, not 1-bit

So what is the benefit of doing that in software compared to a conversion to a lower rate PCM? Preserving ultrasound noise from DSD modulator? It wouldn't even do that, since the extra re-modulation will generate all new noise.
 

Music1969

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Messages
4,669
Likes
2,845
So what is the benefit of doing that in software compared to a conversion to a lower rate PCM? Preserving ultrasound noise from DSD modulator? It wouldn't even do that, since the extra re-modulation will generate all new noise.
I wasn't hinting that this was better than PCM out

Only a comment about how DSD volume is handled for DSD output
 
Top Bottom