- Thread Starter
- #41
It works.
I thought the piano will be the best to test, so I listened this
The piano is on purpose intended to be in the background, so the adjustment,(I replaced the 330k resistor with 470k adjust) should bring forward or take backwards. Nothing like that , very disappointing.
I wanted to hear how the texture of the sound changes, so I switched to this.
Very clear variation of mildness to expressive. The double C is the most clear soft to firstly plucked. All this at 1w average I estimate, where the simulator calculates 0.01% THD.
Although I ended with flu, still, by several days of lack of sleep, I found the mild position so relieving that for sure I love this circuit.
I will proceed with the high impedance version and started the PCB to be installed replacing the opamp. It will be for both types to be populated accordingly. By this for $4 one can get 5 PCBs, a pair populated for high impedance and another pair for variable texture.
With high impedance, the simulator gives a THD of 0.0006% for 1w@8ohms and 0.006% for 100w@8ohms. The major advantage is the reduction of the 3255 noise by 20db, which has already been reduced by ABD mod.
I thought the piano will be the best to test, so I listened this
I wanted to hear how the texture of the sound changes, so I switched to this.
Although I ended with flu, still, by several days of lack of sleep, I found the mild position so relieving that for sure I love this circuit.
I will proceed with the high impedance version and started the PCB to be installed replacing the opamp. It will be for both types to be populated accordingly. By this for $4 one can get 5 PCBs, a pair populated for high impedance and another pair for variable texture.
With high impedance, the simulator gives a THD of 0.0006% for 1w@8ohms and 0.006% for 100w@8ohms. The major advantage is the reduction of the 3255 noise by 20db, which has already been reduced by ABD mod.
Attachments
Last edited: