JayGilb
Major Contributor
It’s so nice to be able to get pcb boards at such a low cost. I still have bottles by of etching solution and resist tape at home from many years ago.Filter PCB. 80x80mm. From JLCPCB costs $4 for 5 pieces.
It’s so nice to be able to get pcb boards at such a low cost. I still have bottles by of etching solution and resist tape at home from many years ago.Filter PCB. 80x80mm. From JLCPCB costs $4 for 5 pieces.
Thank you, @KSTR, it has been thought about via the Axign AX5689 Controller chip & PFFB (a different approach), hasn't it, although what @Hayk is presenting is quite Novel and Simple/Elegant, as you have mentioned. Note that the AX5689 can output PWM@4 or 5Mhz (at least for GaN, as mentioned by @GaNMaster) which means that the 1mH CM choke (as mentioned by @Hayk) could be much smaller, couldn't it?Very interesting topic, subscribed.
It is such a simple and elegant concept one has to wonder why nobody thought about it before. EMI concerns are valid but can't be the only point.
At MPS, this is called PFF (post-filter feedback). The feedback point is located after the output filter.Thank you, @KSTR, it has been thought about via the Axign AX5689 Controller chip & PFFB (a different approach), hasn't it, although what @Hayk is presenting is quite Novel and Simple/Elegant, as you have mentioned. Note that the AX5689 can output PWM@4 or 5Mhz (at least for GaN, as mentioned by @GaNMaster) which means that the 1mH CM choke (as mentioned by @Hayk) could be much smaller, couldn't it?
@Hayk to ask, will this Architecture/Topology work with PFFB? If yes, then potentially/technically, it could be even more Effective/Efficient, couldn't it? Can it handle varying Dead Time?
Any common-mode high frequency content is not filtered without any direct caps to GND. Notably when above the inductors self-resonant frequency.What do you mean by EMI concerns?
For coils, I could recommend the CPD1495 series from CODACA. They're relatively inexpensive even in small quantities and offer some of the best price/performance ratio I know of for Class D amps.If you read the TI document of PFFB, it says, the purpose is to use low cost output filters. 8 years ago, I bought original Sagami inductors for $5 each. Today, On Ali, 2 pcs Sagami is $9.23 and the replacement, 10pcs for $7,89.
The PFFB given by the TI document, decreases the nonlinearty by 5db only.
In AD mod, each branch of the bridge is independent, so you can feedback individually. In BD mod, the output is differential, you need to convert it to single and feedback to the input before the opamps, hello stability. In ABD mod, I use 4th order filter, the phase shift above audio range is too high, it becomes too difficult to stabilize.
So, better to use bigger inductors.
Once the dead time issue is solved, next trouble, is the analog to 1 bit converter. The hysteresis of the comparator, and the linearity of the triangle generator becomes much more important than the nonlinearity of the output filters. To decrease such non linearity it requires local extra feedback. As the analog inputs are inverting opamps, it is very easy to increase the audio range feedback by 20db but keeping the noise gain the same. The neutral circuit in #24 does it by supplying the input in high impedance source. It needs 2 capacitors 100pf-330pf grounding the inputs, to keep the noise gain the same.
That’s not the whole story. It says that you can do that if distortion isn’t as important to you. The primary reason however, next to lowering distortion significantly when using proper filters, is to remove most of the load dependence of the amp.If you read the TI document of PFFB, it says, the purpose is to use low cost output filters.
Thank you, @Hayk, but I can only see 2 transistors in the circuit? What is the output impedance?This 4 transistor circuit can function with 12v, hence it replaces physically the opamp to convert single to differential with adjustable staging. The when R7 is 0 it is backstage and front with 330k. Look No2 phase shift on the tables.
I will start building the neutral tube and this circuit today.
Thank you, @Hayk, 150K input impedance, the top Transistor pair are bootstraped to act as a CCS, is that correct?This is the circuit I already mounted it. It doesn't have yet the high impedance output to see first if the staging does really work.
The Russian tube 6N23p looks to be under embargo, Chinese 6j1 x2 can replace.
Thank you, @Hayk, Yes, Phase/Time Domain Distortion/s is (very) relevant and must always be considered, mustn't it, especially with reference/relevance to the word/s 'Neutral' and/or 'Transparent'?The Japanese, in mid 60's, wanted to know why the Marantz 8b sounded similar to single ended amps and passed through spectrum analyzer to find out it had similar even harmonics dominant. Since diffused by Jean Hiraga the recipe, it became popular idea that to have warm sounding amp you need to have such spectrum.
These days, deaf designers convince noobs that his amp measures 0.002% THD but dominant even harmonics, so it is a certainty that sounds warm.
I simulated below, the 2nd harmonic of 10% with +90° phase and -90°.
What does effect is not the hearing of the harmonics that makes the difference, but in time domain the transients get reversed. If the positive going input pulse, as piano notes, the amp amplifies less than should, than the sound becomes less expressive and more comfortable for long term listening. With reverse phase, it becomes more vivid and more exciting rhythmic.