• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping PA5 Review (Amplifier)

mike70

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 9, 2021
Messages
911
Likes
623
You didn't 'mike70'. Your command of the English language outstrips mine.
Embarrassingly for me, it is a word :facepalm:

I translated quickly (without real knowledge) from the spanish word "valvulado" (something like "with valves")... and it is good ... LOL

I need to go to the casino
 

tc531

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2022
Messages
5
Likes
1
I'm using 32v 5a power supply from an Aiyima a07. It runs cooler and has been perfect for months. I'm using it on my desktop and don't need any more power. At some point in time I will be changing to a higher quality smps of a similar voltage, but, for now, it's fine.
How did you find the pa5 compared to the a07?
 

AudioArchitech

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2021
Messages
307
Likes
230
Location
Canada
I finally just sent my defective PA5 to China (from Canada) and it cost me $130 (14 days Canada Post) for shipping! Purolator, Fedex.. quoted around $350 !?!?!?! Be very careful who you buy from, you don’t want to have to pay shipping to Hifigo in China like I did.

p.s Hifigo didn’t publish my 1 star review. I only see the same 5 positive reviews. Shady
 
Last edited:

TheBatsEar

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 16, 2020
Messages
3,161
Likes
5,113
Location
Germany
I finally just sent my defective PA5 to China (from Canada) and it cost me $130 (14 days Canada Post) for shipping! Purolator, Fedex.. quoted around $350 !?!?!?! Be very careful who you buy from, you don’t want to have to pay shipping to Hifigo in China like I did.

p.s Hifigo didn’t publish my 1 star review. I only see the same 5 positive reviews. Shady
Damn, that sucks. I feel your pain.
 

Toku

Major Contributor
Joined
Apr 4, 2018
Messages
2,427
Likes
2,824
Location
Japan
I'm using PA5, PA3 and AO200 now, but I'm very interested in the newly released Sabaj A20a 2022 and SMSL A300.
The chips used for both units are Infineon MA5332MS.
 

iLoveCats

Active Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2019
Messages
263
Likes
295
Location
USA
I'm using PA5, PA3 and AO200 now, but I'm very interested in the newly released Sabaj A20a 2022 and SMSL A300.
The chips used for both units are Infineon MA5332MS.
These products look like something I would want also. We are really living in a great time for hi-fi.
 

Bleib

Major Contributor
Joined
May 13, 2021
Messages
1,315
Likes
2,335
Location
Sweden
I'm using PA5, PA3 and AO200 now, but I'm very interested in the newly released Sabaj A20a 2022 and SMSL A300.
The chips used for both units are Infineon MA5332MS.
I dunno, the new Sabaj has a worse SNR than their own discontinued A8
 

JohnnyNG

Active Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2019
Messages
179
Likes
185
Looking for a small subwoofer amp, either could fit the bill nicely it seems.
 

TwoEyedJack

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
37
Likes
12
The amp comes with a 38V 4A power brick, how is it possible to output more than 100 Watts per channel with a 150 watt power supply?
 

peng

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,681
Likes
5,245
The amp comes with a 38V 4A power brick, how is it possible to output more than 100 Watts per channel with a 150 watt power supply?

It is possible if that 100 WPC is not "continuous". Manufacturers may even use the term continuous in their published specs, but they likely didn't mean literally continuous, in those cases, they could have meant based on continuous sine wave input signal.
 

TwoEyedJack

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2022
Messages
37
Likes
12
It is possible if that 100 WPC is not "continuous". Manufacturers may even use the term continuous in their published specs, but they likely didn't mean literally continuous, in those cases, they could have meant based on continuous sine wave input signal.
Yhea, but that's the number amirm states on his review of the amp. Don't we know his testing methodology ?
 

chuckt62

Active Member
Editor
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Messages
141
Likes
123
Location
Tejas
Perhaps:
34*4*0.707/2=107.5W RMS
 

peng

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,681
Likes
5,245
Yhea, but that's the number amirm states on his review of the amp. Don't we know his testing methodology ?

What number? If his "continuous" referred to using a continuous sine wave only, but without stating the test duration then it could be for 1 minute, 10 minutes, or shorter, or longer, we have to ask him that question.

Power supplies can output more, even much more than their specified output rating under overload conditions depending on the duration.
 

mdsimon2

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 20, 2020
Messages
2,504
Likes
3,350
Location
Detroit, MI
What number? If his "continuous" referred to using a continuous sine wave only, but without stating the test duration then it could be for 1 minute, 10 minutes, or shorter, or longer, we have to ask him that question.

Power supplies can output more, even much more than their specified output rating under overload conditions depending on the duration.

I asked Amir this after I observed that my Behringer A800 dropped power output after 10 seconds of full output -> https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...lifier-with-sinad-over-120.31305/post-1151445.

Short story is the power vs THD+N sweep takes less than a minute and spends about 5-10 seconds at high power output levels.

Michael
 

tvih

Active Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2020
Messages
163
Likes
130
Been reading up for endless hours about PA5 directly and related topics... with little to show for it. The considered use case for it? Well-measuring high-end speakers (Dynaudio Confidence C1, $6500 MSRP). Rated 4 ohm, with no measured dips below that. Most "conservative" audiophiles would consider it lunacy to even consider a $/€350 amp for that, just like I've gotten a lot of flak for my current amplification many, many times over the years. But given how much for more affordable high quality amplification is these days, I can't help but wonder...

My thinking is: there's more than enough wattage as I don't normally reach more than 1 Wpc peaks. Current handling seems at least reasonably good given the 72% increase in power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm (a good indicator is getting as close to 100% as possible, or so I've read). Obviously very clean measurements overall, at least for the usual ones amir does for his reviews. But can it really reasonably match up to such high-end speakers even so? With or without a subwoofer to lighten the load? Going just by measurements from what I understand I don't see why it wouldn't work for controlled, clean, neutral, detailed playback at the volumes I need. Excellent crosstalk seems to imply good stereo imaging as well, which is important to me. But these are hardly the only measurements one could make - yet even if more was available I'm certainly no electrical engineer, or particularly knowledgeable about the measurements and other super-technical considerations even from just a hobby perspective.

Subjective opinions I've found here and elsewhere are a crapshoot as usual when put together. There's such variance in opinions and so many biases in play, be it an "innate" dislike/distrust towards small devices and Class D from the "traditional/conservative" crowd, or disproportionate praise based on just the measurements without even owning it on the other end. Some users/reviewers praise it to high heavens with absolute terms, then end up saying it's nice for the price. Eh, not very helpful. Others think even cheaper products can match it, like from Aiyima and such. Some claim a lack of "power" even when not clipping - mainly referring to lower frequencies. Would not being closer to the ability to fully double the wattage at 4 vs 8 ohm really result in such, given no dips to below 4 ohm? I'm not sure what else it could be - so assuming the "lack" was real to begin with rather than the absence of some kind of coloring in the sound or something, what would even allow for comparison with other options without a live audition?

So it firstly becomes a question of whether it's a sane consideration to begin with, and then secondly how it compares to other options at various prices as well as my current Audio Analogue Puccini stereo amp ($700 MSRP), a 1997 model - whether it's a meaningful upgrade or not. While not super costly, I don't have exactly great finances these days so that I could afford "mispurchases". The core problem is not being able to audition/compare without buying. It's no wonder I jumped off the upgrade bandwagon after getting the C1s 11 years ago. Back then any upgrade path would've been even costlier than now.
 

Slayer

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
583
Likes
859
Been reading up for endless hours about PA5 directly and related topics... with little to show for it. The considered use case for it? Well-measuring high-end speakers (Dynaudio Confidence C1, $6500 MSRP). Rated 4 ohm, with no measured dips below that. Most "conservative" audiophiles would consider it lunacy to even consider a $/€350 amp for that, just like I've gotten a lot of flak for my current amplification many, many times over the years. But given how much for more affordable high quality amplification is these days, I can't help but wonder...

My thinking is: there's more than enough wattage as I don't normally reach more than 1 Wpc peaks. Current handling seems at least reasonably good given the 72% increase in power from 8 ohm to 4 ohm (a good indicator is getting as close to 100% as possible, or so I've read). Obviously very clean measurements overall, at least for the usual ones amir does for his reviews. But can it really reasonably match up to such high-end speakers even so? With or without a subwoofer to lighten the load? Going just by measurements from what I understand I don't see why it wouldn't work for controlled, clean, neutral, detailed playback at the volumes I need. Excellent crosstalk seems to imply good stereo imaging as well, which is important to me. But these are hardly the only measurements one could make - yet even if more was available I'm certainly no electrical engineer, or particularly knowledgeable about the measurements and other super-technical considerations even from just a hobby perspective.

Subjective opinions I've found here and elsewhere are a crapshoot as usual when put together. There's such variance in opinions and so many biases in play, be it an "innate" dislike/distrust towards small devices and Class D from the "traditional/conservative" crowd, or disproportionate praise based on just the measurements without even owning it on the other end. Some users/reviewers praise it to high heavens with absolute terms, then end up saying it's nice for the price. Eh, not very helpful. Others think even cheaper products can match it, like from Aiyima and such. Some claim a lack of "power" even when not clipping - mainly referring to lower frequencies. Would not being closer to the ability to fully double the wattage at 4 vs 8 ohm really result in such, given no dips to below 4 ohm? I'm not sure what else it could be - so assuming the "lack" was real to begin with rather than the absence of some kind of coloring in the sound or something, what would even allow for comparison with other options without a live audition?

So it firstly becomes a question of whether it's a sane consideration to begin with, and then secondly how it compares to other options at various prices as well as my current Audio Analogue Puccini stereo amp ($700 MSRP), a 1997 model - whether it's a meaningful upgrade or not. While not super costly, I don't have exactly great finances these days so that I could afford "mispurchases". The core problem is not being able to audition/compare without buying. It's no wonder I jumped off the upgrade bandwagon after getting the C1s 11 years ago. Back then any upgrade path would've been even costlier than now.
Lot to take in, so i'll try and be brief with my answer. First off, no need to try and equate price with performance. They rarely go hand in hand. You may first want to try your current amp with the speakers you spoke of, good chance you will be perfectly happy with what you already have.
As for never going over 1 watt as you say. I think you would be surprised, even listening at low or normal levels, it's pretty easy to exceed the 1 watt max you speak of.
Regarding the PA5, I doubt you would need to have any worries regarding power and sound quality. The only thing I would be concerned about is Quality control, warranty repair service hassles.
 

Selkirks

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
64
Likes
157
The considered use case for it? Well-measuring high-end speakers (Dynaudio Confidence C1, $6500 MSRP). Rated 4 ohm, with no measured dips below that. Most "conservative" audiophiles would consider it lunacy to even consider a $/€350 amp for that

I used the PA5 with (MSRP) $28,000 horns and $13,000 electrostatic speakers. At no point did the PA5 sound like the weak link. Lunacy is believing megabuck amps are superior because of pricing. I was guilty of the $$$ = better behavior in the past.
 
Top Bottom