• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping MA4 - new active studio monitors by Topping Professional

The amount of desktop real estate they'd consume is insane, and they'd look ridiculous on any commercial stand that could accommodate their depth.
The bottom-line must be that size does matter for the bottom-end (@49Hz/-3dB, @42Hz/-10dB).
e.g., older generation but low-priced Infinity Primus150 recently reviewed here has about 30% less volume (re: MA4) and lacks much bass extension.
Topping refers to these MA4s as 'studio' (rather than 'desktop') monitors.
SpeakerStands.jpg

@$200/pair these hefty stands may be an unreasonable expenditure for such low-priced Topping MA4's.
 
In my 50+ years of involvement in home audio, I don't recall ever seeing any speaker with that sort of baffle width to enclosure depth ratio. The amount of desktop real estate they'd consume is insane, and they'd look ridiculous on any commercial stand that could accommodate their depth.
A feasible desktop installation option:

1743114674779.png
 
The bottom-line must be that size does matter for the bottom-end (@49Hz/-3dB, @42Hz/-10dB).
e.g., older generation but low-priced Infinity Primus150 recently reviewed here has about 30% less volume (re: MA4) and lacks much bass extension.
Topping refers to these MA4s as 'studio' (rather than 'desktop') monitors.
View attachment 439571
@$200/pair these hefty stands may be an unreasonable expenditure for such low-priced Topping MA4's.
they can refer to them however they want, but no studio will ever buy them, maybe they meant the studio apartment? 4" midbass with such extension is only useful in very close nearfield/desktop setups, but it's hard to imagine how they could be properly placed as such
 
Last edited:
What's the material they are made of?
They weight around 4 kg if I see it right so considering the drivers and the electronics it can't be wood.

I imagine that they have take care of some short of bracing, as such enormous side panels would resonate like hell if they didn't.

@thewas ,I will laugh forever with the soffit-mounted TV .
 
I don't care if these speakers are called professional or not, I could call the foam wrist pad on my desk "professional" because it helps me day trade futures.
 
I also think so but 2 x $165 is $330?
The image shows two speakers for 1998 Yuan though, approximately $275.3. They seem to drop the pro-audio praxis of demanding full price for each additional speaker ;)
 
Some of the harsh comments on performance and price make me think that the rise of scientific design approaches and chinese manufacturing capabilities REALLY spoiled us lately.

Comparison of dimensions (HxWxD)
Topping MA4: 255x140x288= 10,28L
JBL LSR305: 298x185x231= 12,73L
KRK Rokit 5H4: 285x195x241= 13,39L
Adam T5V: 298x179x297= 15,84L
Kali LP6: 359x222x260= 20,72L
 
The more appropriate comparisons are other monitors with 4" woofers.

For example,

Adam A4V; 268 x 220 x 158 mm = 9.32 L
Neumann KH 80: 233 x 154 x 194 mm = 6.96 L
Presonus Eris 4: 178 x 185 x 254 mm =8.36 L

MR4 is a large speaker for a 4" driver, even without accounting for Topping choosing to use depth as the largest dimension. I'm sure they have acoustical reasons, but it makes for an awkward-sized speaker.
 
The more appropriate comparisons are other monitors with 4" woofers.

For example,

Adam A4V; 268 x 220 x 158 mm = 9.32 L
Neumann KH 80: 233 x 154 x 194 mm = 6.96 L
Presonus Eris 4: 178 x 185 x 254 mm =8.36 L
To which I might add
Kali LP-UNF: 254 x 164 x 186 mm = 7.75 L.
Focal Shape 40: 257 x 161 x 200 mm = 8.28 L
Genelec 8020D: 230 x 151 x 142 mm = 4.93 L

Note that the dimensions are not always given in the same order, e.g. the Eris Studio 4 has height going last (WxDxH) while for the others it's usually the first number (HxWxD), and neither order equals WxHxD.
Here is one given in WxHxD:
EVE SC203: 116 x 190 x 134 mm = 2,95 L
It should be surprising nobody that the Genelec 8010A is smaller again at HWD 195 x 121 x 116 mm = 2.73 L. iLoud Micros are even smaller though at 180 x 135 x 90 mm = 2.19 L. That makes D3Vs seem downright chunky!

I would bet anything that the MR4 has much higher output in that low frequency range though.
Indeed. Making a speaker bigger remains a very cost-effective way of boosting low-frequency output. There is a reason why the smallest models are the most expensive, they have to fight against physics with better driver performance. The only notable outlier is the A4V, which is both relatively expensive and big at the same time.
 
Last edited:
Looks like it’s protesting big time @ 96dBSPL
 
I think it's better than Lp-unf and d3v, for less price.
 
I think it's better than Lp-unf and d3v, for less price.
That it arguably is (though it looks like the LP-UNF may do a better job keeping its composure in the lower bass). Woofer electrical linearity still is anything but great (it could do with transitioning to current driving in the low hundreds of Hz), but at least the low crossover is helping mitigate it. There is what may be some sort of buzz at 400 Hz.
 
In my 50+ years of involvement in home audio, I don't recall ever seeing any speaker with that sort of baffle width to enclosure depth ratio. The amount of desktop real estate they'd consume is insane, and they'd look ridiculous on any commercial stand that could accommodate their depth.
I remember seeing the following elac speakers in a Japanese magazine once. They have similar proportions.

d.jpg
 
I remember seeing the following elac speakers in a Japanese magazine once. They have similar proportions.

View attachment 446397
These special compact models with a thin aluminum enclosure are continuously offered till today and still produced in Germany, this is the current 30th anniversary version, a design classic in a kind of Bauhaus style:

1745481483525.png


 
In my 50+ years of involvement in home audio, I don't recall ever seeing any speaker with that sort of baffle width to enclosure depth ratio. The amount of desktop real estate they'd consume is insane, and they'd look ridiculous on any commercial stand that could accommodate their depth.
1100310-angstrom-trinity-project-speaker-system.jpg

yamaha_mcr_040_dock_speaker_1.jpg

iu

iu
 
With that extra large surround, it'll be interesting to see if it really can deliver some bass. Almost looks like the Dayton 4" paper one.
I'm guessing a Dayton nd-91 is too expensive for use in commercial desktop speakers?
 
Back
Top Bottom