Indeed.I think the product is aimed at mobile content producers in local market. There, I think by far the application is to use a mobile phone, not a laptop.
I forgot CEntrance even existedThis is what CEntrance should be doing.
I missed the EIN, sorry. Should be enough.I computed the EIN when using multiple gain levels resulting in the value that I reported. My regular dynamic range measurements are for line level and hence the 0 dB gain. If I am missing something there, please explain and i will add.![]()
Yes, I was confused.No, 2.2 Volt is correct. That value is not seen by the AP as it only sees digital samples. Hence the reason I manually wrote that.
I think you may be confused by the scope display. The values there are in "D" or digital. Scope is showing peak to peak 0.5 full scale value which when converted to RMS becomes the -6 dBFS you see in the meter below. It has no relationship to any voltage as again, AP is only seeing digital samples, not analog waveform in ADC testing.
I found the manual here:Net, net, 2.2 volt at 0 dB gain is pretty good although I would have wanted to see 4 volt if one were to use that as line input.
According to the manual it's a 3.5 mm monojack with 2.5V supply. Use a short adapter cable 3.5mm TRS female to 2 x 6.35mm TS male, e.g. like this.I see there is an input labelled "3.5 mic". Is this a stereo or mono mini jack?
I'm asking because there are some nice and simple mid-side stereo mic with 3.3 mm jacks. Would it be possible to test this input?
I would use it to record a stereo source (either a good ORTF mic or the output of my mixing console) into my smartphone for catching videos of concerts. Currently I use a cheap Behringer interface but this has no VU meter and no battery, so it drains the battery of the smartphone.I think the product is aimed at mobile content producers in local market. There, I think by far the application is to use a mobile phone, not a laptop. I have not looked at the recording apps on mobiles but I assume effects/processing is more limited than what the M62 is providing. I would also think a limiter on the device would work better than one in the host as it has no latency to deal with. Ditto for monitoring although other interfaces provide local loopback for that.
I think for our general audience here, you could use this box as both a desktop DAC+headphone app and an interface for measuring your room and such. Other interfaces in its price range have much lower performance especially in headphone department. And inclusion of the battery means it will work well listening on a train and such if the size and weight is not a concern.
I can also see it be used for desktop voice recording for content creation. Yes, you won't need the battery there but you are not paying for it either seeing how this is not more expensive than typical desktop interfaces with lower measured performance.
Thanks for the suggestion. However, I understand that the two 6,35 mm mic inputs are balanced, so TRS. Could be some kind of problem in connecting a mono TS to a balanced TRS input?
It wasn’t THAT long ago that these were reviewed here:I forgot CEntrance even existed
www.audiosciencereview.com
www.audiosciencereview.com
www.audiosciencereview.com
I suppose your EIN figure is dBu A-weighted, correct ?Noise performance is extremely good:
![]()
He is. I was hoping to meet him while in China but he was either working or on vacation. I am not sure if he was involved in this device though.Is this still Johny Yang? He still there?
I will have to check but pretty sure the answer is no.I suppose your EIN figure is dBu A-weighted, correct ?
It is all I could find.Is the HP out the only analog output?
No. Just make sure to use a TS connector, which connects the minus pin with the ground Pin.Thanks for the suggestion. However, I understand that the two 6,35 mm mic inputs are balanced, so TRS. Could be some kind of problem in connecting a mono TS to a balanced TRS input?
Any information on this DSP01 IC? Is this the first Topping-branded chip?Teardown see attached files