restorer-john
Grand Contributor
And if they did, would it be of interest to THX's lawyers?
My reading of the patent (and I'm not a lawyer or expert in patents) is that it appears to be incredibly broad in scope, vague, non-specific and contains multiple schemes, many of which, (if not all) previously existed in commercial products. As is often the case, the real detail simply is not presented or involves a proprietary combination not immediately obvious.