Ricwa
Member
Is there any indirect way to confirm the assumption that distortions have a “positive” effect? For example, I am not only able, but I prefer to turn down the volume of a more expensive (and more powerful - 166 watts per channel) amplifier compared to the volume of the LA90, which begins to sound like a more expensive and more powerful amplifier only at higher volumes. That is, having compared both of them at the same volume, I hear better the more powerful one - but it is perceived as UNNECESSARY loud (and at a much lower volume everything is perfectly audible). And it’s impossible to listen to LA90 at such a starting volume - the music disappears, you need to increase the volume and then small details appear that you can hear in a powerful amplifier even at low volume - but then it becomes too loud, it’s just uncomfortable!
Can you use this information to answer the question - which of these two amplifiers is faulty (after all, the LA90 can also fail after more than a year of continuous daily use for many hours)?
What method can be used to understand what is happening with these two amplifiers?
Your method is a good one! If you prefer to turn down the volume, your subconscious is giving you a negative impression of that amplifier. So your indirect confirmation answer is right there in your question and it’s telling you that of the two, your preference is for the LA90.
As to missing the details, I believe you but I’d also wager that your definition of details will change over time. What you may be hearing is exaggerated details due to distortion. As you pay attention to those subtle details, you may very well train your ear to prefer them as they are… subtle.
Last edited: