Ah so here you are telling me what I perceive? This is the error in your thinking. You are wrong. The difference was plain for me to hear. I'm not telling you what you hear. Don't tell me what I hear.
No, I fully believe you percieve a difference. What I am disputing is the reason for that perception:
We know that our hearing is subject to perceptive bias. What we hear is impacted by what we know, what we believe, how we feel, our life experiences, what we see etc etc. No-one is immune to this if they are human - it is how we are built. In fact we would be unable to function if our senses were not filtered by our unconscious brain. Everyone is subject to this, it happens at the unconscious level, and it is not possible to avoid it - even when we are aware it is happening.
Those differences you describe can and do come from cognitive bias. Further, the fact that you hear clear differences when the measurements say there is nothing, or almost nothing to be heard suggests bias as the cause is vastly more likely than actual audible differences in the sound waves reaching your ears..
Further more, we know that small differences in level (volume) of less than around 0.5 dB, are not perceived as a volume change, but are perceived as a difference in the quality of the sound - with (normally) the higher level sounding better. To eliminate this confounding factor in listening tests it is necessary to level match the signal by using a multimeter to equalise the voltage. A sound level meter is not accurate enough.
This two things are the main reasons why - if we want to understand whether we are hearing a genuine difference between devices - we use controlled and blind testing.
The only way to know is to test level matched and blind with at least 10 repeats.
If you really trust your ears, then use them (
and only them) to determine the difference.