You are another one who missed the point. So this answer is also for you: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ne-amplifier-review.15226/page-62#post-521855To @bogi I guess I'll just say this:
There are lots of people who claim that they can hear something. Most of them can't actually make a difference in a real double blind test.
In this case however, you MAY actually hear something... since the oversampled signal is being slightly degraded vs. the original.
Now you may be able to actually prefer the degraded one : it's your right ! Just like some people prefer that good old "tube sound" with lots of THD. What you can't do is pretend that it's actually better from a scientific / high-fidelity point of view. It's not and it will never be, so just drop it. That's what people in this topic are telling you, including John Yang who is arguably more knowledgeable than most of us on this matter.
Without scientific proof to back up your claims, not only nobody will believe you, but most people here will actually get bored. This is "Audio Science Review" after all, not "Audiophile Magic". And by "scientific proof" I mean either some concrete measurement we wouldn't know about, or the results of an ABX listening test that would clearly be outside of the statistical error range. Until then...
Think a bit next time before you start writing ... and educate yourself.
> In this case however, you MAY actually hear something... since the oversampled signal is being slightly degraded vs. the original.
All your delta sigma DACs including your phone or TV are performing oversampling.
> Now you may be able to actually prefer the degraded one : it's your right !
That's about you ...
> Without scientific proof to back up your claims
You are not able to read and understand written text.
> either some concrete measurement
I provided one, it shows the opposite you are mistakenly thinking.