• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping Hane IEM Review

Rate this IEM:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 16 8.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 45 22.8%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 136 69.0%

  • Total voters
    197

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
46,522
Likes
261,748
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests and detailed measurements of the Topping Hane IEM. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $129.
TOPPING HANE IEM Harman Adjustable frequency response Review.jpg

I like the minimalistic "bling" of the Hane. It was also very comfortable to wear for me with the include silicone tips (two different sets are provided). A differentiating feature over some of its competitors is four dip switches to tailor the bass and treble response. As usual, they are tiny and difficult to toggle. Topping has wisely included one of those "sim tools" to aid in this which made the job easier.

The nozzles are on the larger side but I was relieved that it was not much of a chore to slide the tips over them. On some IEMs, it is a multi-minute struggle.

The cable is soft and supple and a bit longer than most IEMs which I appreciated. I find the typical cord to be a few inches too short to give me enough freedom while listening at desk. Hane's cord was just the right length.

If you are not familiar with my headphone/IEM measurements, please watch this tutorial first:


Topping Hane IEM Measurements
The IEM is shipped with all dip switches set to off. It was challenging to toggle the switches without disturbing the seal of the IEM in my GRAS 45CA fixture. So I only tried the few options that got me the closest to our target:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch Setting Frequency Response Measurements.png


At first, I thought there was something wrong with the IEM as toggling the bass increase caused a large drop in level. It was then that I realized that it is "boosting" bass by reducing the energy above that region. So I recalibrated the levels by increasing the volume on the headphone amp to get the same reference at 425 Hz. This means that you lose fair bit of sensitivity which you will see at the end of this section and reflected in the labels at top right. From here on, normal testing commenced with the switch 2 set to on:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 Frequency Response Measurements.png

As you see, Hane essentially hugs our target curve. Where it deviates is not material as the curve is not that precise and at any rate, music production lacks any standards. I don't expect to need EQ but here is the deviation from target:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 relative target Frequency Response Measurements.png


As you see, it is pretty flat below 10 kHz.

I was worried that distortion would be increased due to attenuation caused by SW 2 but such a worry was unwarranted as Hane turned in superbly low distortion numbers:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 Relative THD Distortion Measurements.png

As you see, the blue line essentially hugs the zero line producing a SINAD of 84 dB where our hearing is most sensitive. Distortion in this measurement is mathematically derived from a noisy measurement (relative to electronics) so likely won't get any better than this. Even at 114 dBSPL, Hane is cruising with no obvious signs of break up.

Here is the absolute graph:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 THD Distortion Measurements.png


I expect clean group delay from IEMs due to lack of pinna interactions and that is what we get:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 Group Delay Measurements.png

The messy region from 100 to 200 Hz is likely due to rocking mode of the IEM. You can see that slight kink in the frequency response. It is a common thing and nothing of worry.

Impedance is not flat, likely due to turning on SW2:
TOPPING HANE IEM Switch 2 Impedance Measurements.png


Sensitivity as noted, is quite low, actually matching the average full size headphone than an IEM!
Most sensitive high-end iem review.png


So best to use a headphone amplifier to drive it. I used my everyday RME ADI-2 Pro. Comfortable listening was at -25 dB and loud was around -19 or so.

Topping Hane Listening Tests
My first track that is a female vocal with light instrumentation had the familiar neutrality but with a delightful springing of bass that you don't normally think is there due to most speakers not going that low. I cycled then to my spatial track and I was surprised that there was good instrument separation. Sound stage was behind my ears a bit so different than headphone sound.

I then proceeded to listen to my full range and bass heavy tracks. Hane produced a level of fidelity that at times was jaw dropping. The bass is deep and so smooth. The highs linger in the air so nicely. I wondered how many people have a million dollar (speaker) system yet have never experienced what is possible with a well implemented IEM such as Hane. The clarity in bass and overall balanced response is heart meltingly good.

I felt no need to mess with the switches or EQ.

Conclusions
We have been gifted audio research that has led to some incredibly good sounding IEMs that are frankly, transformative. IEMs exist at less than half the price of Hane which get us there but Hane justifies its added cost in customizability and more reserved look. It also has class leading low distortion.

If you are sitting on the sidelines of IEM revaluation, I implore you to try excellent offerings such as Hane. Even if you decide you don't like IEMs in your ear, you owe it to yourself to experience once, the level of fidelity that music playback can bring.

It is my pleasure to recommend Topping Hane IEM.
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

  • Topping Hane.zip
    33 KB · Views: 57
Looks nice - not sure I need another IEM, but the range of FR adjustments seems well-judged, and not being overly sensitive to output impedance and source noise are pluses in my book.
 
Topping is in the IEM business now? Gasp

In any case, I happen to be in the lookout for IEMs to replace my old ones that unfortunately died..
 
Nice IEM. But now there are so many already, cheap ones with good frequency response and low distortion. Also, as Harman2019IEv2 is kind of shouty, many, like myself, prefer less pinna gain around 2-6 kHz. And this one does not deliver it, even with the switches.
 
I believe switch 3 will reduce the “shouty” Harman region which is so bloody annoying (according to Timmy from gizaudo)

 
I believe switch 3 will reduce the “shouty” Harman region which is so bloody annoying (according to Timmy from gizaudo)

Ok, might be, but there is still the issue with the unsmooth, peaky treble, which no switch configuration will be able to deal with, especially this peak at around 12kHz. Even EQing it might be difficult up to impossible.
Just compare it with the Truthear Nova, which has also Harmanesque pinna gain, but very smooth, extended treble without peaks and resonances, especially when using foam tips. So you can EQ at will and with success.
 
I guess the advantage is flexibility but if you are the apprehensive type is going to be hell deciding which one is the best configuration for you.

I don't mind switches (or nozzles) as long as they are used only to adjust bass or treble level but having too many combinations is a headache, you stop hearing any difference after the 3th or 4th one.


I think for the price (and aesthetics) they are a year or two too late.
 
It's another Harman 2019 targeted headphone, of which there are many. Nothing wrong with that, but, personally I don't prefer it, as it seems too forward for me. The distortion is excellent which is a plus, but the efficiency!!!! For me, IEM's are for taking OTG, not for plugging into a headphone amp. I'm sure my A70 Pro could more than drive it, but why would I want to turn to an IEM when I already have an HD 800 and an LCD X (2021) for home use.

I would think the Truthear Nova would be a more efficient version of this for around the same price.

As always, thank you for the excellent review, Amir.
 
That feeling when you can't wear in-ear monitors because of your ear canal sensitivity :rolleyes: and you wish that full-size open-back headphones would catch up with them.
This. My ear canals are probably too narrow, since all the IEMs I have tried simply don’t fit into them. If I force push them in, it simply hurts.
 
Hey, not bad!

Definitely loving the low distortion. Everything seems pretty well tamed except for maybe that slight rise at ~12-13kHz.

Thanks @amirm!
 
I wouldn't fret over that rise: it's too high up to make much difference and my own personal HRTF has more of a spike above 10k than that anyway. Yours may as well. Worst case scenario, it adds a little air and space to the sound. I can live with that. I bet you can use some foam tips to eliminate it.
 
Last edited:
Everything seems pretty well tamed except for maybe that slight rise at ~12-13kHz.
That is a function of the fixture and will highly vary based on actual use. It is a resonance due to volume of the tube in front of the measurement mic. My GRAS fixture "high resolution" coupler suffers far less than typical coupler but it is still there:

1735455099565.png


These are the variations you can get without the damping in my fixture:
1735455152567.png


It is therefore impossible to know what resonance there is in real usage.

As I have said though, lack of standards in music production means you don't know if what is there is already exaggerated, neutral or diminished so there is no good solution here other than per track equalization or just ignoring it.
 
@amirm : I am sorry, but I don’t understand what you mean here. Could you please explain a bit more? Thank you
The combination of the mass of the IEM with compliance of the artificial pinna sets up a system that has a resonant frequency of a few hundred hertz. That shows up as a kink in the frequency response:

index.php


See the twist between 100 and 200 Hz. That is specific to this combo.
 
Back
Top Bottom