aka_Z
Active Member
That's why I said it's ugly. Possibly, the only difference and the price, of course 
lol, I don't care about measurements, my ears tell me what sounds good.The E70 is totally transparent to the source. If the Denafrips is totally transparent to the source, the signal exiting will be identical to the E70 (any differences well beyond the threshold of human hearing).
Give it your best shot and come back with alot of graphs and data to support any perceived differences you think you've discovered.
You really need to tone down the negativity. Reread what I've already posted as improvements in the new Denafrips Ares II 12th anniversary.That's why I said it's ugly. Possibly, the only difference and the price, of course![]()
You might be on the wrong forum then, though!lol, I don't care about measurements, my ears tell me what sounds good.
No, it doesn't. Which was quite a disappointment. It's basically the same el-cheapo remote in a more heavy and clunky case.But none of you answered the most important question above: "Does it work better from a distance or from an acute angle?" I don't care much about remote weight but it's quite annoying targeting device to be able to change the source.
Well, over the years I had many, many remote controls that have substantial better performance than the Topping ones. All "in that genre" (i.e. IR). Just of better quality.it's infra-red isn't it?
i don't know what miracles of transmission you expect from that sort of frequency, but you are likely going to be as disappointed with anything of that genre
seems i have had nothing but shit ones previously then, as the topping is the best example i have usedWell, over the years I had many, many remote controls that have substantial better performance than the Topping ones. All "in that genre" (i.e. IR). Just of better quality.
No, it doesn't. Which was quite a disappointment. It's basically the same el-cheapo remote in a more heavy and clunky case.
Whoa! It sounds like you're the designer of this thing! ;-) It's not the size that makes it clunky. It's the fact that this RC is just a brick. With about the same weight too. Even for $25 it could have looked like what we consider a remote control in 2023.Clunkier than your plastic TV remote which is 6 times bigger? What are you expecting in a $25 remote? You can tell all they did from the layout was transport the same guts to a metal case. It's always a case by case result for users, but for me, it's a great and inexpensive upgrade and works well.
Don't forget to wipe. I have a universal IR remote. It is not an outstanding unit like Logitech, but it has a much greater range and operating angle. Works noticeably better than Topping. Topping must be aimed at the device. Maybe a poor quality diode, low power and angleworks from any angle, another room, including restroom![]()
@JohnYang1997
Why, don't you have ears!?You might be on the wrong forum then, though!
[…]
I wouldn't buy anything that doesn't render Tidal.