Interesting. So what does this mean for the resolution of the DAC in practise? There is, despite -99 db - 89 dB, only a loss of maximal 6 dB or must be the complete digital volume steps summerized and then substracted by the clicks for the result?
The resolution of the DX9 is such that any cable or component you attach will have an impact on the sound quality. So, if you are into comparing various items this is a good platform. With me, I tried three difference USB cables - from $25 to $1300 and could hear a difference in each. The one I was using regularly was the least desirable so it went to the utility bin. The other, cheapest and most expensive were both keepers. Just saying...this DX9 has such low distortion and ample power it will not be the weak link in a top tier system. You can audition streamers, USB and Ethernet cleaners and will be able to tell if it does what you expected. IIs? evaluating it now.Probably best to let it come to ambient temperature in the box if it's that cold (condensation).
Different in what, color?
That it measures better and all that?Interesting. So what does this mean for the resolution of the DAC in practise? There is, despite -99 db - 89 dB, only a loss of maximal 6 dB or must be the complete digital volume steps summerized and then substracted by the clicks for the result?
If you can really hear differences amongst the cables you have either a broken DAC or some broken cables.The resolution of the DX9 is such that any cable or component you attach will have an impact on the sound quality. So, if you are into comparing various items this is a good platform. With me, I tried three difference USB cables - from $25 to $1300 and could hear a difference in each. The one I was using regularly was the least desirable so it went to the utility bin. The other, cheapest and most expensive were both keepers. Just saying...this DX9 has such low distortion and ample power it will not be the weak link in a top tier system. You can audition streamers, USB and Ethernet cleaners and will be able to tell if it does what you expected. IIs? evaluating it now.
Me..Crazy how this has the same MSRP as the D70 pro SABRE and A70 pro stack. That stack might measure slightly better I presume, but really, who wouldn't choose this unit over that? This unit is so nice and good looking.
Just because it's rounded?Me..
Nice and good looking is highly subjective, personally I don't like the aesthetics of the DX9 and, again personally, for me that is already enough reason not to even consider this unit.
One of the reasons yesJust because it's rounded?
The volume knob has acceleration, so it changes more if you turn it fast rather than slow.I received my DX9 today. Packaging is pretty good. The remote does not come with a battery (it takes the CR232 or whatever small disc types); that's a hassle. Like someone else, I also noticed what I thought was a scratch on the top left corner, but it seems to have been some adhesive like hot glue that I was able to remove with a fingernail after some effort without leaving a mark.
The volume knob is... different. I have to swipe it about 7 times to get from -99dB to -30dB, and yes the relays will "click" about 10 times during this process. The clicking is not as annoying as someone else stated. Is there a setting to make the volume knob more sensitive so I don't have to rotate it so much? The first 50-60dBs are almost pointless. Strangely, with my Meze Classic 99's I can still hear music even at -99dB (extremely faint). I can't hear it with higher impedance/less sensitive headphones.
You sure it's not just the relays clicking?View attachment 355869
Topping be topping... They agreed for a replacement, but I'm not ok to send it back to China to some random address without any guarantees.
It's still clicks too, even with the standard windows drivers. Though less than before. Good idea in a ****** wrapper, as usual
Yep, it happens without me touching the device at allYou sure it's not just the relays clicking?
Yea so you should send it back to the retailer you bought it from and have them deal with Topping.Yep, it happens without me touching the device at all
Could've bought from a reputed local retailer. Sure, it will cost a little bit more than buying from AliExpress but when things do go wrong you don't have to deal with the Chinese parcel service lottery.Topping be topping... They agreed for a replacement, but I'm not ok to send it back to China to some random address without any guarantees.
look at this, no doubt about your perception: the 2nd is at -40 and the third is at -70...Frankly, I thought the Valhalla sounded better playing the same song through my HD600s (1/4" plug). And that is using the built-in DSP in my mid-2015 MacBook Pro outputting to a 3.5mm to RCA cable into the Valhalla. It sounds "fuller" and not as "thin".
Yes I've read that review previously, which is for the original Valhalla. Mine is the newer model still for sale on the Schiit website. I'm on the wrong website to disregard measurements, but the numbers and my ears are telling me different things.look at this, no doubt about your perception: the 2nd is at -40 and the third is at -70...
It sound fuller, but you aren't listening the same thing that is on file or on any support... is another world, better for you maybe, but not "high-fidelity" towards the artist
Review and Measurements of Schiit Valhalla Amp
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Schiit Valhalla tube headphone amplifier. It is on kind loan from a member. The unit is discontinued. I think it came out in 2011 (?). From what I can tell, the cost was US $450 or so. The sample I have has been through some war duty but...www.audiosciencereview.com