PEQ is available on Moode audio like software. Which can be easily paired with DAC.
Get ready to duck, tomatoes coming your way.I would like to ask anyone who has tested both the Topping DX5 and EX5, if the DX5 has a deeper (and grander?) soundstage than the EX5. Because both online reviews and my usage of my own EX5 have shown to me that the EX5 has a relatively shallow soundstage. I have found the EX5 soundstage to be, like online reviews say, a wall of sound in my face.
I would like to ask anyone who has tested both the Topping DX5 and EX5, if the DX5 has a deeper (and better?) soundstage than the EX5. Because both online reviews and my usage of my own EX5 have shown to me that the EX5 has a relatively shallow soundstage. I have found the EX5 soundstage to be, like online reviews say, a wall of sound in my face.
A full course in perception is beyond the scope of this forum post but the short version is that's not how soundstage works.I would like to ask anyone who has tested both the Topping DX5 and EX5, if the DX5 has a deeper (and grander?) soundstage than the EX5. Because both online reviews and my usage of my own EX5 have shown to me that the EX5 has a relatively shallow soundstage. I have found the EX5 soundstage to be, like online reviews say, a wall of sound in my face.
EX7? DX9Pro?Since this forum is about perfection, the amp section that is beat by the relatively cheap L30 and IEMagni could be a little better for IEMs.
I don’t mind the new design but prefer the “Hot Hatch” (to quote Topping) retro design of the previous products.
Hope the next DAC/AMP can improve the amp to perfection and incorporate one of the new AKM chips.
How about a A30Pro with a plain Jane high end DAC inside and no fluffy display stuff to fail or distract from the operation.EX7? DX9Pro?
I'm hearing about the next generation of the A90 in the next few months.How about a A30Pro with a plain Jane high end DAC inside and no fluffy display stuff to fail or distract from the operation.
OooPs! Not supposed to use, "Ch-Fi." Peeps used it as a derogatory racist term so it's been banned here @ ASR.Chi-Fi
It's not uncommon for PCBs to be made by a contract company and then different brand names use the same contractor for PCBs making and stuffing.the innard layout of Oppos bear an eerie resemblance to the circuitboards inside a Gustard.
It's not uncommon for PCBs to be made by a contract company and then different brand names use the same contractor for PCBs making and stuffing.
They should have put the pcb in 12kg billet aluminium casing with a blue uv meter and a big volume knob with number of lights and priced it $10k then it would have been very entertaining ? Isn't it ? Why people hate so much better measuring yet cheap products ? May be you have some extra cash than others !I have to agree. This latest Topping SINAD queen is boring. Deserves a yawning panther. I see no innovation here.
I’m surprised Haute Audiophoolia hasn’t insisted on cases being made of Low-background Steel fished up from the bottom of Scapa Flow.They should have out the pcb in 12kg billet aluminium casing with a blue uv meter and a big volume knob with number of lights and priced it $10k then it would have been very entertaining ? Isn't it ? Why people hate so much better measuring yet cheap products ? May be you have some extra cash than others ,,!
At this point I believe the better SINAD is mostly just to compete with other (mostly) Chinese manufacturers doing the same things. All the new revised products are meant to fill in price point niches as most people buy audio equipment with some kind of budget in mind. Features you mention like hardware DSP will just increase the price needlessly with more silicon, DSP is better accomplished with a source device/software anyway. There's lots of other things to focus on like beefier power amps, ADCs/interfaces, better AIOs, products with more inputs/outputs/digital outputs, streamers (which can easily have software DSP as well).It’s a well-measuring dumb product. It has great engineering spec but nothing with a potential to improve real or perceived audio fidelity compared to thousands of other boxes. No PEQ, no bass management, no loudness compensation, no crossfeed, no anything that adds value. I think it’s hard to argue it won’t sound the same as a similar component from 2015, or probably 2005. What’s the greatness in that?
Topping right now makes spectacular dumb products. I’m currently listening with one (E50 I think is the model number - DAC with coax input and balanced outputs) in the signal chain - but it’s a cog that could be replaced with a lot of other cogs with zero to de minimis difference. The added value is really on either end of it: the miniDSP SHD Studio processor and Neumann monitors. When Topping starts thinking more holistically, I’m sure they will add considerable value. But another dB on a SINAD chart is more pleasing to the engineer’s brain than the listener’s ears.