Their software doesn't have that. RME does but at a much higher price.I know the PEQ applies to all inputs (including coaxial which is what I'd use), but does anyone know if PEQ can be applied to separate outputs? Say if I wanted to run a Harman Curve EQ correction to my headphones, but needed a different EQ going out the XLR/RCA outputs to my monitors... would that be possible?
I know the PEQ applies to all inputs (including coaxial which is what I'd use), but does anyone know if PEQ can be applied to separate outputs? Say if I wanted to run a Harman Curve EQ correction to my headphones, but needed a different EQ going out the XLR/RCA outputs to my monitors... would that be possible?
According to my information, the D50 III can store and switch between 5 different presets.Their software doesn't have that. RME does but at a much higher price.
According to my information, the D50 III can store and switch between 5 different presets.
With Topping Tune software, you can, of course, save and recall as many presets as you like.
It will probably be the same with the DX5 II.
Since the device doesn't exist yet, any statement about it would be pure fiction. Sorry, but this can only be answered internally by Topping at the moment.Can you assign a preset to an output and have it switch automatically? Or do you have to change the output and then change the PEQ preset?
The D50 III doesn't exist yet?Since the device doesn't exist yet, any statement about it would be pure fiction. Sorry, but this can only be answered internally by Topping at the moment.
This is the DX5 II thread, and it doesn't exist yet.The D50 III doesn't exist yet?
I couldn't wait and purchased a DX5(Not the lite) for now. Upgrading from the old E30 & L30 combo, needed the balanced XLR outputs. If this ever comes out I'll see if I can swap it out haha.
I had the original DX5 but just started to use my MX3s headphone amp instead. With my headphones I can't hear any sort of difference at all.but I don't think I can settle for a HPA that technically performs a little worse than my current one.
I had the original DX5 but just started to use my MX3s headphone amp instead. With my headphones I can't hear any sort of difference at all.
And MX3s runs cooler which I like.
For your information, I received confirmation from Topping today: the DX5-ii will indeed be released this month:If this ever comes out I'll see if I can swap it out haha.
Have they indicated in which markets and confirmed pricing?For your information, I received confirmation from Topping today: the DX5-ii will indeed be released this month.
Why does it matter whether the DX5 II has PEQ or not? If you're not using it, it's turned off.Now I'm sort of leaning towards not using PEQ at all, so the DX5 II might not be on the table anymore. The regular DX5 is difficult to find anymore, but the Lite version is available (my understanding is that the only difference is the normal DX5 has MQA support, and the Lite does not).
I'm also looking at the SMSL RAW MDA-1 (the version with the dual ESS9039Q2M chips), but I'm weary of SMSL because they don't seem to think Mac users exist, and none of their FW updates are available for that platform. I do have VMware Fusion, now, which I hope will resolve some of the issues I've had with the last SMSL device I tried (the AO300, but I also have the PL100, which works perfectly fine for me). Any questions I have about either of these are things I can ask in the dedicated threads, though, so I'll stop it right there.
Comparing the DX5 II to the MDA1 completely misses the mark: 7.6W output power, 0.00006% THD+N, and full PEQ support on all inputs make it a precision-engineered device. Let’s stop pretending they’re on equal footing.The Topping DX5 II specs look very similar to SMSL RAW-MDA1 which retails for $279.99.
Most won't need that HP power. And MDA1 has to plus side that it has more inputs. What DX5 II really offers extra is PEQ and if people can't measure their in-room response or know the headphone frequency response it might often go unused.Comparing the DX5 II to the MDA1 completely misses the mark: 7.6W output power, 0.00006% THD+N, and full PEQ support on all inputs make it a precision-engineered device. The MDA1 simply isn’t in the same league. Let’s stop pretending they’re on equal footing.
Why does it matter whether the DX5 II has PEQ or not? If you're not using it, it's turned off.
The DX5 II has a significantly more complex power supply and a significantly more advanced and powerful HPA. The HPAmp in the RAW MDA-1 is a bit older and simpler in terms of development and was also used in the Sabaj A10d 2022.
The DAC chips are the same on both devices, but I also trust topping a little more.
Anybody wants a used Topping DX5?For your information, I received confirmation from Topping today: the DX5-ii will indeed be released this month:
« I'm glad to confirm that the release is planned for this month and will include the European market. As for the price, we're still finalizing details. We'll announce the pricing on our official website and through our media channels once it's confirmed. »