Slightly adjacent question, but still involving the DX1 II as the source.
I’ve been very happy with the DX1 II through headphones, via line out to Edirol MA-10A speakers, and even into a set of Creative Pebbles. It sounds clean and excellent in those setups.
However, when I feed the DX1 II RCA output into my dad’s restored Cambridge P50 amp, using either AUX or RADIO input, it sounds noticeably flatter/less engaging than the same material played on vinyl through the P50’s Phono 1 input. I tried a handful of records/tracks and did rough volume matching. I understand this is not a perfect comparison because vinyl and digital releases may use different masters.
Subjectively, the vinyl path sounds fuller, brighter, richer, and more pleasing, while the DX1 II into the line input sounds comparatively flat/lifeless on the same amp/speakers.
I’m not claiming vinyl is "more accurate" or that the DX1 II is doing anything wrong. I’m trying to understand what variables could explain this and how I could test them. Possible suspects:
- different vinyl vs digital mastering
- cartridge loading / capacitance into the P50 phono input
- non-flat RIAA response or colouration in the vintage P50 phono stage
- the P50 line inputs behaving differently from the phono input
- the Yamaha NS-150 speakers simply benefiting from the tonal colour of the vinyl/phono path
What would be the most sensible way to investigate this scientifically? Would a phono test record plus recording the P50 output into an audio interface be the right approach? Are there particular measurements I should try, such as frequency sweep/pink noise/channel balance from the phono path, then trying to recreate the response with EQ on the DAC path?
I realise this is subjective territory, but I’m trying to turn it into something measurable rather than just saying "vinyl sounds warmer."
If it matters the speakers are these:
Yamaha NS-150 and it also has an active subwoofer which I think is the YST-SW150.