I'm sorry but there is something I just don't understand...
If you say that all those dacs are transparent and sound the same why would you even recommend the d90se(for instance)?
Why isn't the conclusion of your review some thing like:
"I don't recommend this dac since you can get other dacs with the same features and 'way too transparent' for 400$ less. Go spend this money for speakers or... charity".
As far as we know this is the best performing DAC ever, and for some people that's worth something even though we're past the threshold of audibility.
Historically, this is cheap for owning the "best" of something, especially with independent measurement confirmation.
Consider the GTE Trinity DAC, which 15 years ago cost upwards of $55,000 and included either 16 or 32 Burr-Brown PCM1704 chips. Was it ever properly tested beyond what was in the brochure? Who knows.
https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/tas-at-rmaf-robert-harley-on-upper-end-electronics-1
"For starters, the three-chassis Trinity DAC employs 16 Burr-Brown PCM 1704 DACs per channel that are driven by a time-interleaved signal. That is, each DAC is driven by an input signal that has been delayed slightly in relation to the preceding DAC. The DAC outputs are all switched together, resulting in an analog output waveform in which the classic stair-step structure is much finer, smoother, and closer in shape to the original sine wave. In fact, the waveform is so smooth that the Trinity DAC allows you to bypass the digital filter entirely when playing high-resolution sources (three selectable filters are available for standard-resolution sources). The measurements presented in the brochure are the best I’ve seen on any DAC."