As far as I can read, it was specifically explained that your
impression of there being a difference is 100% real. After all, nobody can tell you what you heard, felt or saw. It was also explained very well that the
impression of a difference
doesn't mean that one actually exists.
So, as far as I can see in the past couple of posts, nobody tried to tell you what you heard or did not hear. Fellow members simply pointed out that the data supports the fact that there is zero audible difference between these DACs.
If you are actually interested in finding out if your initial impression was correct or if the differences you think are there are just placebo, I encourage you to look into what is required for an unbiased and reliable comparison of audio devices. Primarily, that includes precise level-matching, blinding and instant switching.
Just uploaded a video on the basics of performing controlled tests in audio. It was motivated by saving myself text in having to write all of this down when telling someone who to do these tests right. And as a counter to a few online personalities to keep saying they do "blind" tests yet when...
www.audiosciencereview.com
This is abbreviated synopsis of the paper, Ten Years of ABX Testing, by David Clark: http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=5549 ABX testing as you may know is a double blind testing methodology aimed at determining if someone can reliably identify A from B. Both A and B are presented to the...
www.audiosciencereview.com
This afternoon, I was home alone, I took advantage of the empty home to crank the volume higher than usual. I had a great time, from Norma Winstone to Norah Jones, with detour to Manzanera and Simon & Garfunkel, everything sounded spectacular and captivating. All the glorious detail and...
www.audiosciencereview.com
en.wikipedia.org