That would explain why replacement displays are so readily available.Many D90s have OLED display problems.
That would explain why replacement displays are so readily available.Many D90s have OLED display problems.
MQA is not a Tidal invention, there is a LOT of information on the debacle and scam that is MQA. A simple google search will surely inundate you with reading material if you are truly interested.MQA isn't even a 'thing' now is it? -- I believe it was a TIDAL invention, and I think they dropped it a while back.
Yes, and mine has MQA --- When I had a TIDAL subscription, I tried it out, just to see if it would work.
Yep, I was going to say that on Tidal there are still plenty of songs that are MQA. They were converting some of them and I believe that all new "Master Quality" are purely FLAC but many of the older ones still remain as MQA. Just found that out like a month ago when I played an older album I liked.MQA is not a Tidal invention, there is a LOT of information on the debacle and scam that is MQA. A simple google search will surely inundate you with reading material if you are truly interested.
It isn't really a "thing" anymore, but there is still a lot of material available to stream that has been encoded with it, unfortunately. That's why, unfortunately, it would be better to have MQA full decoding available to you so that you can listen to if if you wish with the best SQ possible.
And if you like you jam music and subscribe to Nugs.net you might find that a LOT of artists have fallen for the scam and had a LOT of their shows encoded in MQA. I really hope they saved the original versions...Yep, I was going to say that on Tidal there are still plenty of songs that are MQA. They were converting some of them and I believe that all new "Master Quality" are purely FLAC but many of the older ones still remain as MQA. Just found that out like a month ago when I played an older album I liked.
It doesn't really surprise me that many people fell for it, because on the surface, it looks quite good, and if you are not a highly technical individual, then you just see better sound quality for less memory used, and you go for it.And if you like you jam music and subscribe to Nugs.net you might find that a LOT of artists have fallen for the scam and had a LOT of their shows encoded in MQA. I really hope they saved the original versions...
It's currently doing double duty as a digital preamp as well, sounds perfect to me... I simply cannot fathom what could be improved beyond this. When the D90III is eventually £250 second hand I'll grab one and find outAwesome! And now you have a world-class DAC at a great deal since you got it second hand. Enjoy!
The seller has graciously agreed to pay for the replacement display from Aliexpress so I went ahead and ordered it. Once it arrives I'll document how to replace it yourself and most importantly, if it even works.
Yes, that's the one.Is the display this one? https://de.aliexpress.com/item/1005007732122172.html
Replaced. Worked like charm. Now it is brighter than the Pre90's display! Is it the same display? But, IIRC, opening the Pre90 is a bit more complicated.
It would be a 10 minutes job if it were not for the little sponges on the back of the display, which must be either removed and regaled or replaced. And removing them from the older display destroys them or leaves some of it attached. Then, the new display does not properly stay in place. So you need a little solution for that: I used a couple of little felt pads on the board to ensure the "reduced" sponges keep the display in place.






Good idea. I like red/orangeBeen enjoying this DAC, have no complaints at all other than the display... Not a huge fan of the white text so I ordered a sample pack of Selens lighting filters, going to install one in front of the OLED, just need to decide on a colour first...
I'm leaning towards amber or turquoise, both reminiscent of late 80s early 90s hifi... The amber being heavily used by Yamaha and the turquoise by Marantz
What's your pick?
![]()
I used a razor blade to remove them, they came right off with adhesive still attached so I was able to reuse them, probably varies unit to unit but good catch, I would edit my post above to mention them but that feature isn't enabled on this forum sadly.
In my case the old display was completely faulty so there was no concern of damaging it as I was going to throw it away anyway.I think I read it, or I thought about the same solution on my own–but I was scared to go with a razor blade there, I did not want to risk damaging the display (with all likelihood it is more resistant than I feared, but why risk?)

In my case the old display was completely faulty so there was no concern of damaging it as I was going to throw it away anyway.