Get ready for some torture in watching my first youtube video that I just created on this DAC!
I don't understand why, when Amir is so focused on the principle that measurements should approach theoretical perfection, he gives a pass to these poor filters. None is anywhere near what they should be, and others such as those using ESS DACs show that it is easy to do.Less than 10dB down at 22.05kHz (@44.1k) is not "very high attenuation" nor is it remotely "nice".
It should be 80-90dB down. You know that.
Have you considered limiting all your THD+N tests to 30 or 45khz bandwidth, so as not to pick up noise shapers?
I think the point is to point out this noise shaping or ultrasonic leaking. Maybe it's worthwhile to show two bandwidths though. WolfX does this too.so as not to pick up noise shapers?
I don't understand why, when Amir is so focused on the principle that measurements should approach theoretical perfection, he gives a pass to these poor filters.
I think it's more of a AP algorithm quirk the way amir presented it, but not sure. That said, a measurment that we don't see here, arguably rightfully because all DACS shows ruler flat, is frequency response, but for some reason that I don't really get, people and manufacturers still like to be able to have full extended response to 100k, to avoid being labeled "not really high res" And I believe the High Res japanese certification label also imply some version of that, but I don't really understand that, there is nothing good up there. And here I am not talking the validity of High resolution sampling or DSD formats, it's a different debate weather they are useful, but those exist for different technical reasons than to be able to reproduce the supersonics. There is no reason for an analog output to go much beyond the audible range IMO.I think the point is to point out this noise shaping or ultrasonic leaking. Maybe it's worthwhile to show two bandwidths though. WolfX does this too.
It's kind of ridiculous to blame Topping for the default Cirrus Logic filters, same for AKM. Both don't have a steep 22kHz option available, it's not there. ESS Sabre does have a fewThis Topping is a joke in that respect and should be called for what it is.
It's kind of ridiculous to blame Topping for the default Cirrus Logic filters, same for AKM. Both don't have a steep 22kHz option available, it's not there.
EDIT: just did a video review of this. Although it covers the same info as above, I explain the measurements in more detail:
The fact these manufacturers insist on this kind of filtering has always been odd to me though. As in, 'Why'.Both are clearly faulty. The only reason they get away with this crap is there is so little "up there" in the first place. Digital pioneers would be turning in their graves.
"Ums" and "Ahs" are why the Goddess created digital editing.It's not torture. Well done. If you can ban yourself from "ums" and "ahs" it would be essentially as good as it gets.![]()