martijn86
Active Member
There's been talk of the usefulness of DAC resolution if amplifiers don't get that high but I'm curious to see how upstream and downstream devices interact with each other in resolving detail. I think the most significant thing I took away from the previous discussion is that DAC resolution and dynamic range are not comparable to amplifier noise floors. The details are best left to those who know what they are talking about but it would be cool to see a test that compares a brilliant DAC into a terrible amplifier vs. a terrible DAC into a brilliant amplifier. At what point is the output of the best amplifier in the world precisely the same between DAC's? Does that point exists? I'm keen to learn about that.Is it a general rule that upstream devices should have SINAD 10 dB greater than an amplifier?
More details would be appreciated (or place on the forum where I can read more about that )
I personally haven't heard of the 10dB better rule. My approach has always been that, every flaw a device produces gets processed and amplified down the chain and thus getting the first analog signal from the DAC to be as perfect as it can be, is beneficial down the entire chain. All noise, jitter, ultrasonics will go through your processor, pre-amplifier and power amplifier. All of these components will deal with them in their own way possibly causing ultrasonic problems to affect audible ranges. But that just keeps me poor and looking for perfection and I could easily be wrong about my approach.
Last edited: