• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping Centaurus - teardown

edit - just found the review. not bad actually.

would really like to see measurements. cant imagine that discrete R2R comes close to an modern integrated DAC.
 
edit - just found the review. not bad actually.

would really like to see measurements. cant imagine that discrete R2R comes close to an modern integrated DAC.

 
R2R? Antediluvian tech? Why?! (I handbuilt my first 4-bit DAC with selected resistors and CMOS switches (for instrument control) that way back in 1977 when there was little choice, but now?...)
 
If R2R DAC, then I would go with the original. The HoloAudio Cyan 2. According to GoldenSound it measures quite well with at least 108 dB SINAD, I2S Input, good DSD capabilities and no Jitter at all.
Only Problem: My WiiM Pro Plus measures also very well…..
I am glad, that a friend of mine will lend me the Cyan 2 for a few weeks. Perhaps I can imagine some sound differences!
 
It's been a long time without purchase new DAC, since we are working on new class D amp with 12V trigger function.
And I choose Centaurus duo to R2R is my favorite type of DAC.


Front panel, it is new ID design with LCD display. The painting finish is really good than before.
JsWOAu1.jpeg


Back panel, XLR/RCA output, I2S/Coaxial/Toslink/Bluetooth/AES/USB input and trigger. I believe it has all interface we need.
PPDI2Bm.jpeg


Bottom side, it also updates new foot with bigger rubber which makes more stable on table. The painting finish makes fingerprint more observed.
du6Zcwh.jpeg


Inside, this DAC is made by Holo Audio DAC module same with Cyan2
5Z49mki.jpeg


Backside, we can see red screw glue on it to avoid someone teardown.
QvALeen.jpeg


The power module. There are two portion, digital power DC5V on the left and analog power ±8V on right.
bZYdUaT.jpeg


AC input, EMI filter put on main board and we can see ±8V wording on power module.
b9WpegC.jpeg


The digital control portion, XMOS XU316 on left side, Altera CPLD in the center and the IC without top marking should be SPDIF receiver.
SYNWIT MCU is used to control the DAC on the right side, I am not sure why this IC need to scratch out its top marking.
74WyIRA.jpeg


XMOS/CPLD used NDK crystal, I am not sure which series but they should be NZ2520SDA on CPLD.
iAmHhgL.jpeg


Holo Audio R2R module, the OPA1612 may be used for reference voltage.
f0H8uFr.jpeg


The backside of DAC module, those resistors are used for DSD decoding. There is something behind DAC module.
PD7gj0C.jpeg


There are two IC on main board, CS43198 on left and the right IC should be used for upsampling or PEQ.
And there are some ultra low noise regulators surround those two IC.
O6beRpP.jpeg


It is quite interesting to add another DAC CS43198 since Centaurus is a R2R DAC, I guess CS43198 may be used for volume control.
Normally R2R DAC can't do volume control except extra volume control IC or something.
AiIMCLJ.jpeg


The I/V used Topping discrete module without epoxy coating. I am not sure this module is the same as Topping A70.
The single end converter used OPA1612. The AC coupling caps used Nichicon FW 220uF 16V
fJ9RqkO.jpeg
@whydan TY very much for this report and your very detailed explination of what everything is. Very interesting!
 
Would be interested to know why it would measure so differently (in certain aspects) on Amir's test bench.
The oversampling part seems to be particularly broken.
 
Last edited:
edit - just found the review. not bad actually.

would really like to see measurements. cant imagine that discrete R2R comes close to an modern integrated DAC.
I think this one is pretty close. I personally don't understand the fascination with expensive R2R and multi-bit DACs that are inferior to cheap delta sigma ones, but it isn't my money.
 
Maybe, part of the same logic applies to both, R2R DACs and TTs. Both offer very much ok'ish SQ but their technology is better to understand / grasp by those loving such gear. Why not?
 
Would be interested to know why it would measure so differently (in certain aspects) on Amir's test bench.
The oversampling part seems to be particularly broken.

Likely Amir tested it with the default OS mode (no details were given in the review) which doesn’t show the issues mentioned in the GS video, which, if true, is a problem as the ASR review likely led to many people purchasing a half baked product.
 
Likely Amir tested it with the default OS mode (no details were given in the review) which doesn’t show the issues mentioned in the GS video, which, if true, is a problem as the ASR review likely led to many people purchasing a half baked product.
I would argue Topping should be fixing this issue and replacing all faulty units.
 
Likely Amir tested it with the default OS mode (no details were given in the review) which doesn’t show the issues mentioned in the GS video, which, if true, is a problem as the ASR review likely led to many people purchasing a half baked product.
Worth to be tested again.
 
Any plans to do a review of Topping D90 III Discrete? For comparison?
It depends if any friend of mine who buys a D90 III Discrete so I can borrow one.
I already did D90 III teardown as below if you may interest.
 
R2R? Antediluvian tech? Why?! (I handbuilt my first 4-bit DAC with selected resistors and CMOS switches (for instrument control) that way back in 1977 when there was little choice, but now?...)
I just re-read Amir's review and I can't honestly answer why. Maybe as a curiosity? Personally I don't get it - at the end of the day it's just a box that does the same job less efficiently and not as well. But as Amir says in his review, at least this device doesn't really do major harm.
 
Likely Amir tested it with the default OS mode (no details were given in the review) which doesn’t show the issues mentioned in the GS video, which, if true, is a problem as the ASR review likely led to many people purchasing a half baked product.
The details were in the review, I think most people just didn't bother reading it past seeing the blue bar in the SINAD chart and subconsciously labeling it "great".
 
The details were in the review, I think most people just didn't bother reading it past seeing the blue bar in the SINAD chart and subconsciously labeling it "great".

You made me read it one more time and I stillI don’t see any mention of the OS mode that was active at the time measurements were taken. What am I missing?
 
edit - just found the review. not bad actually.

would really like to see measurements. cant imagine that discrete R2R comes close to an modern integrated DAC.
Cameron Oatley (GoldenSound) did also make in deep measurements:
If you want R2R - Just go with the HoloAudio Cyan 2 - The Original!

 
The CE mark for the EU is located on the bottom of the device. The declaration is the responsibility of the importer or the person placing the product on the market.
CE certificates for such devices are prohibited by law in the EU anyway.
Also,

ce-china-export-difference.png


I can imagine they only want this added when within Schengen.
 
Back
Top Bottom