• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Topping B100 Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 20 5.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 21 5.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 76 19.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 271 69.8%

  • Total voters
    388
Class B amps are only used in RF due to crossover distortion. So the common version is a hybrid Class AB, not class B. Here, feedback is used so much as to nullify crossover distortion in class B. Much like the way Hypex amps use a lot of feedback to deal with all sorts of non-linearities in class D.
Would there be any TID (Transient Intermodulation Distortion) issues with such high feedback, or was that all a myth anyway?
 
Would not be a first.

-Ed
It's still better than being designed to be subjectively evaluated by web gurus and audiophile forums and by subjective critics who display their technical, cultural and intellectual inadequacies in paper hifi magazines... All things dictated by their complacency towards the brands that make them exist.
If this "accusation" against Topping is true...
 
Any proof it's a true Class-B ? (e.g. output stage idle current)
 
Last edited:
I think this amp was designed to be measured by Amir.
To say it was designed to be measured is possible... maybe a little shortsighted though as goals are goals. But to say it was designed to be measured by Amir is rather disingenuous.

Topping publish their own AP measurements.
Any proof it's a true Class-B ?
Topping mentioned it in this post and there is further discussion in that thread;


JSmith
 
That's not proof. Some understand class B and AB differently.

I will ask differently. What is the quiescent current of the output transistors ? Are the emitter resistors present ?
 
Last edited:
How about power consumption? Probably low but can't find any information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCH
There are massive vent holes on either side of the case:

View attachment 392616

Is it enough? Maybe..? Definitely don't stick this in a cupboard, especially not with one side against a side panel :facepalm:
Far from perfect.
What I do not like is that this less than optimal design is such, so it can fit this configuration imagined by their marketing department:

1726486831746.jpeg
 
Hi

Some of us are getting all cynical and trying to find faults...
Some of us, may want at times to take a deep breath and put cynicism aside.

This is an incredible amp, one that advances the SOTA in audio reproduction: A spectacular, superlative performer with incredible, genre-defining performances.

and..
...
...

It is not perfect, its most glaring fault: Not suitable to any and all applications. ;)

For context, the Benchmark AHB2, one of the best amplifiers reviewed here is 100 watts per channel and it cost $3500... Topping B100, cost $600/pair... and it stands, along with its 2 Topping brethren, as the best performing amplifers, reviewed here... What in the world are we asking for? That it also be 1000 watts? Seriously? Is the AHB2?

Of course the issues of longevity and reliability are fair concerns, only time will tell.

This B100 SOTA amp, it bears to repeat , is $600/pair..

Peace.
 
Last edited:
Proof needed...
No proof is needed that this is less than optimal thermal design of the enclosure (to be specific). Probably sufficient for 95% of use cases... but we are on this forum because we like to think we are among 5% who know better.
 
Hi

Some of us are getting all cynical and trying to find faults...
Some of us, may want at times to take a deep breath and put cynicism aside.

This is an incredible amp, one that advances the SOTA in audio reproduction:A spectacular, superlative performer with incredible, genre-defining performances.

and..
...
...

It is not perfect, its most glaring fault: Not suitable to any and all applications. ;)

For context, the Benchmark AHB2, one of the best amplifiers reviewed here is 100 watts per channel and it cost $3500... Topping B100, cost $600/pair... and it stands, along with its 2 Topping brethren, as the best performing amplifers, reviewed here... What in the world are we asking for? That it also be 1000 watts? Seriously? Is the AHB2?

Of course the issues of longevity and reliability are fair concerns, only time will tell.

This B100 SOTA amp, it bears to repeat , is $600/pair..

Peace.
Agree at some but the comparison with something 10 yo is not fair,price is not enough.
I would compare it with something like this:


5 times the power (7+ times if we take peak power as the measure) ,completely inaudible performance,built in PSU,good record by the company at support,reliability,etc,great looks (subjectively,to me,at least it's all metal),etc

At double the price of course (and I consider it more than fair) but taking into account how these amps are often changed (look at how many users change the desktop short of this even in the same year) I think it ends up cheaper at the end.
 
No proof is needed that this is less than optimal thermal design of the enclosure (to be specific). Probably sufficient for 95% of use cases... but we are on this forum because we like to think we are among 5% who know better.
I dont think you use the term "optimal" properly... Optimal doesent mean "highest efficiency possible with disregard to other factors".
 
I dont think you use the term "optimal" properly... Optimal doesent mean "highest efficiency possible with disregard to other factors".
I used it in a meaning "most desirable" thermal design (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/optimal).

Obviously, cooling efficiency is not the highest priority at Topping, but some other factors.
I remember their integrated amp LA90, with perfect measured performance, but needlessly cramp interior with beefy heatsinks on sides with horizontal fins???
1726490615923.jpeg

The reason is probably the looks:
index.php
 
Last edited:
What's the power consumption on 0 input and some constant non zero input?

Can these be stacked without overheating for multichannel systems?
 
These little amps will push speakers with 85 dB sensitivity to a bit over 100 dB. That is quite loud, and many speakers already are reaching high levels of distortion and compression by that point.

For someone who listens to their music at a reasonable volume, say 80 dB, in a small to modestly sized room, these amplifiers will have 20 dB of dynamic headroom. That is sufficient for most music, especially considering that a lot of modern recordings are very compressed.

They may not be for everybody, but I see applications they will serve well.

I would like to see how they handle a complex load. But, I suspect they will perform well.
 
Back
Top Bottom