Sokel
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
- Messages
- 9,102
- Likes
- 9,726
The second USB-C on the back must be power input,can't think of anything else.If it runs off USB (no wall wart) I'll probably try one.
Let's hope it's only optional.
The second USB-C on the back must be power input,can't think of anything else.If it runs off USB (no wall wart) I'll probably try one.
If a powerful headphone amplifier is on board, it will draw power accordingly. Therefore, I prefer interfaces that have a separate power input.The second USB-C on the back must be power input,can't think of anything else.
Let's hope it's only optional.
it can also come handy for someone using it for measurements (even if it's not the low-noise champion we thought it would be) to power it with a battery or an ultra low noise PS IF it switches internally when detects external power.If a powerful headphone amplifier is on board, it will draw power accordingly. Therefore, I prefer interfaces that have a separate power input.
You can still run the power from a computer USB port, you would just have two USB cables, one for data and the other for power (maybe).The second USB-C on the back must be power input,can't think of anything else.
Let's hope it's only optional.
Totally get you. To be honest, my old TC interface, although it came with a wall wart, I always ran it straight from the Firewire for convenience, even though performance (specs) were meant to improve with the wall wart.My interest is remote recordings where not needing to plug into the wall is a big plus.
Good point!My interest is remote recordings where not needing to plug into the wall is a big plus.
There is P48, don't think there's digital I/O though, not on this device, maybe the bigger devices will have them?No digital I/O except the USB?
Edit:No phantom power either?
Can't see the back connections well (the ones that goes to active speakers),I hope they are balanced.
Audio interfaces have digital I/O 20 years now,even then you had to go to 100 euros devices (like my E-MU 0204) if one didn't want one,from them up they all had if I'm not wrong.There is P48, don't think there's digital I/O though, not on this device, maybe the bigger devices will have them?
The Focusrite Scarlett range has been the best selling audio interface for years, specially their entry level ones, and they do not have digital I/O except USB. This is reserved only for the larger models in the range. Check Amazon review numbers, they are a good proxy of overall sales. Both Solo and 2i2 are extremely popular. I guess this is Topping's main competitors.Audio interfaces have digital I/O 20 years now,even then you had to go to 100 euros devices (like my E-MU 0204) if one didn't want one,from them up they all had if I'm not wrong.
(it's been about that time the last time I searched about interfaces)
I guess the 100 euros devices of 20 years old are the 200 euros devices of now.The Focusrite Scarlett range has been the best selling audio interface for years, specially their entry level ones, and they do not have digital I/O except USB. This is reserved only for the larger models in the range. Check Amazon review numbers, they are a good proxy of overall sales. Both Solo and 2i2 are extremely popular. I guess this is Topping's main competitors.
Also makes sense for traveling,it's small,light,all you need is this and a small laptop.It makes sense: if a bedroom musician is buying his/her first audio interface for recording him/herself, instrument + voice, that is enough. He/she does not have other devices to connect to other than instruments/mic and computer. Having a digital output on an audio interface supposes that he/she has other devices to connect to, so not entry level anymore. I own a 6i6 2nd gen with digital coax that I connected to a better DAC+HP amp at the time (now it is collecting dust in a drawer for years...).
With a lack of optical input and only 1/4” output, to me this looks more similar to the Focusrite 2i2 than the Babyface in both features and physical build. The Focusrite sells for $120. This Topping probably has a better headphone amp though.Kinda of looks like performance roughly in line with an RME Babyface, which for $200 would be a big seller I think. Plus a better more powerful headphone amp. If it runs off USB (no wall wart) I'll probably try one.
Fortunately, unlike in 2006, UAC 2.0 compliance is a thing.Back when I was young, there was this great interface, the E-MU 0404 USB. It had stellar performance for its time (apart from headphone section), only that the drivers made it unusable. In the end, the vendor just abandoned any development, and the users were left on their own.
To be fair, neither does a MOTU M2 or Scarlett 2i2 or similar. Performance seems to indicate something M2-like as well, if with a more powerful headphone amp. Competition would also include the likes of SSL 2 and Audient iD14 MkII, and perhaps Tascam US-2x2HR and UAA Volt 2 as well.No digital I/O except the USB?
It would be extremely silly if it didn't have that, considering that sub-$50 interfaces do... probably controlled by one of the buttons around the jacks, or the big toggle switch at the back.Edit:No phantom power either?
Looks like TRS jacks. Implementing an impedance-balanced output is quite trivial.Can't see the back connections well (the ones that goes to active speakers),I hope they are balanced.
The Focusrite Scarlett range has been the best selling audio interface for years, specially their entry level ones, and they do not have digital I/O
Just because the competition keeps churning out boring products, it doesn't excuse this one being the same.To be fair, neither does a MOTU M2 or Scarlett 2i2 or similar. Performance seems to indicate something M2-like as well, if with a more powerful headphone amp. Competition would also include the likes of SSL 2 and Audient iD14 MkII, and perhaps Tascam US-2x2HR and UAA Volt 2 as well.